Skip to main content
Log in

Economic Studies in Motor Neurone Disease: A Systematic Methodological Review

  • Systematic Review
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Motor neurone disease (MND) is a devastating condition which greatly diminishes patients’ quality of life and limits life expectancy. Health technology appraisals of future interventions in MND need robust data on costs and utilities. Existing economic evaluations have been noted to be limited and fraught with challenges.

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify and critique methodological aspects of all published economic evaluations, cost studies, and utility studies in MND.

Methods

We systematically reviewed all relevant published studies in English from 1946 until January 2016, searching the databases of Medline, EMBASE, Econlit, NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) and the Health Economics Evaluation Database (HEED). Key data were extracted and synthesised narratively.

Results

A total of 1830 articles were identified, of which 15 economic evaluations, 23 cost and 3 utility studies were included. Most economic studies focused on riluzole (n = 9). Six studies modelled the progressive decline in motor function using a Markov design but did not include mutually exclusive health states. Cost estimates for a number of evaluations were based on expert opinion and were hampered by high variability and location-specific characteristics. Few cost studies reported disease-stage-specific costs (n = 3) or fully captured indirect costs. Utilities in three studies of MND patients used the EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire or standard gamble, but included potentially unrepresentative cohorts and did not consider any health impacts on caregivers.

Conclusion

Economic evaluations in MND suffer from significant methodological issues such as a lack of data, uncertainty with the disease course and use of inappropriate modelling framework. Limitations may be addressed through the collection of detailed and representative data from large cohorts of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kiernan MC, Vucic S, Cheah BC, Turner MR, Eisen A, Hardiman O, Burrell JR, Zoing MC. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Lancet. 2011;377(9769):942–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hogg KE, Goldstein LH, Leigh PN. The psychological impact of motor neurone disease. Psychol Med. 1994;24(3):625–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Talbot K. Motor neuron disease: the bare essentials. Pract Neurol. 2009;9:303–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miyashita M, Narita Y, Sakamoto A, Kawada N, Akiyama M, Kayama M, Suzukamo Y, Fukuhara S. Health-related quality of life among community-dwelling patients with intractable neurological diseases and their caregivers in Japan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;65(1):30–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiò A, Logroscino G, Traynor BJ, Collins J, Simeone JC, Goldstein LA, White LA. Global epidemiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review of the published literature. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;41(2):118–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Motor neurone disease: assessment and management. 2016. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng42. Accessed 19 Sept 2016.

  7. Leigh PN, Abrahams S, Al-Chalabi A, Ampong MA, Goldstein LH, Johnson J, Lyall R, Moxham J, Mustfa N, Rio A, Shaw C, Willey E, King’s MND Care and Research Team. The management of motor neurone disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(Suppl 4):iv32–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Motor Neurone Disease Association. MND treatment trials. http://www.mndassociation.org/research/mnd-research-and-you/treatment-trials/. Accessed 3 Aug 2016.

  9. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Systematic reviews: CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York; 2009. https://www.york.ac.uk/media/crd/Systematic_Reviews.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2016.

  10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. International Monetary Fund (IMF). Exchange rate archives. http://www.imf.org/external/np/fin/data/param_rms_mth.aspx. Accessed 17th Oct 2016.

  12. Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2015. http://www.pssru.ac.uk/project-pages/unit-costs/2015/index.php. Accessed 17th Oct 2016.

  13. Alanazy H, White C, Korngut L. Diagnostic yield and cost-effectiveness of investigations in patients presenting with isolated lower motor neuron signs. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15(5–6):414–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vitacca M, Paneroni M, Trainini D, Bianchi L, Assoni G, Saleri M, Gilè S, Winck JC, Gonçalves MR. At home and on demand mechanical cough assistance program for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(5):401–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gruis K, Chernew M, Brown D. The cost-effectiveness of early noninvasive ventilation for ALS patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005;5:58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tavakoli M. Disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Identifying the cost-utility of riluzole by disease stage. Eur J Health Econ. 2002;3(3):156–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tavakoli M, Malek M. The cost utility analysis of riluzole for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the UK. J Neurol Sci. 2001;191(1–2):95–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Riluzole (Rilutek) for the treatment of Motor Neurone Disease (TA20); 2001.

  19. Bryan S, Barton P, Burls A. The clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of riluzole for motor neurone disease—an update. Birmingham: West Midlands Development and Evaluations Service, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology. University of Birmingham. 2000.

  20. Stewart A, Sandercock J, Bryan S, Hyde C, Barton PM, Fry-Smith A, Burls A. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of riluzole for motor neurone disease: a rapid and systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(2):1–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Messori A, Trippoli S, Becagli P, Zaccara G. Cost effectiveness of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Italian Cooperative Group for the Study of Meta-Analysis and the Osservatorio SIFO sui Farmaci. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;16(2):153–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ackerman SJ, Sullivan EM, Beusterien KM, Natter HM, Gelinas DF, Patrick DL. Cost effectiveness of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I therapy in patients with ALS. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15(2):179–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ringel SP, Woolley JM, Culebras A. Economic analysis of neurological services. Eur J Neurol. 1999;6(Suppl 2):s21–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gray AM. ALS/MND and the perspective of health economics. J Neurol Sci. 1998;160(Suppl 1):S2–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ginsberg GM, Lev B. Cost-benefit analysis of riluzole for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Pharmacoeconomics. 1997;12(5):578–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Booth-Clibborn N, Best L, Stein K. Riluzole for motor neurone disease. Development and Evaluation Committee Report No. 73. Wessex Institute for Health Research and Development. 1997.

  27. Chilcott J, Golightly P, Jefferson D, et al. The use of riluzole in the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Sheffield: Trent Institute for Health Services Research. University of Leicester, Nottingham and Sheffield. 1997.

  28. Boylan K, Levine T, Lomen-Hoerth C, Lyon M, Maginnis K, Callas P, Gaspari C, Tandan R, ALS Center Cost Evaluation W/Standards and Satisfaction (Access) Consortium. Prospective study of cost of care at multidisciplinary ALS centers adhering to American Academy of Neurology (AAN) ALS practice parameters. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;17(1-2):119–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oh J, An JW, Oh SI, Oh KW, Kim JA, Lee JS, Kim SH. Socioeconomic costs of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis according to staging system. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16(3–4):202–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Obermann M, Lyon M. Financial cost of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case study. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16(1–2):54–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Connolly S, Heslin C, Mays I, Corr B, Normand C, Hardiman O. Health and social care costs of managing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): an Irish perspective. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16(1–2):58–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Athanasakis K, Kyriopoulos II, Sideris M, Rentzos M, Evdokimidis J, Kyriopoulos J. Investigating the economic burden of ALS in Greece: a cost-of-illness approach. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2015;16(1–2):63–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gladman M, Dharamshi C, Zinman L. Economic burden of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a Canadian study of out-of-pocket expenses. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15(5–6):426–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Larkindale J, Yang W, Hogan PF, Simon CJ, Zhang Y, Jain A, Habeeb-Louks EM, Kennedy A, Cwik VA. Cost of illness for neuromuscular diseases in the United States. Muscle Nerve. 2014;49(3):431–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kang SC, Hwang SJ, Wu PY, Tsai CP. The utilization of hospice care among patients with motor neuron diseases: the experience in Taiwan from 2005 to 2010. J Chin Med Assoc. 2013;76(7):390–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jennum P, Ibsen R, Pedersen SW, Kjellberg J. Mortality, health, social and economic consequences of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a controlled national study. J Neurol. 2013;260(3):785–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Muscular Dystrophy Association. Cost of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, muscular dystrophy, and spinal muscular atrophy in the United States. Muscular Dystrophy Association, The Lewin Group Inc. 2012. https://www.mda.org/sites/default/files/Cost_Illness_Report.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2016.

  38. Lopes de Almeida JP, Pinto A, Pinto S, Ohana B, de Carvalho M. Economic cost of home-telemonitoring care for BiPAP-assisted ALS individuals. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2012;13(6):533–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vitacca M, Comini L, Assoni G, Fiorenza D, Gilè S, Bernocchi P, Scalvini S. Tele-assistance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: long term activity and costs. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(6):494–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ward AL, Sanjak M, Duffy K, Bravver E, Williams N, Nichols M, Brooks BR. Power wheelchair prescription, utilization, satisfaction, and cost for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: preliminary data for evidence-based guidelines. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):268–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schepelmann K, Winter Y, Spottke AE, Claus D, Grothe C, Schröder R, Heuss D, Vielhaber S, Mylius V, Kiefer R, Schrank B, Oertel WH, Dodel R. Socioeconomic burden of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, myasthenia gravis and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. J Neurol. 2010;257(1):15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. López-Bastida J, Perestelo-Pérez L, Montón-Alvarez F, Serrano-Aguilar P, Alfonso-Sanchez JL. Social economic costs and health-related quality of life in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Spain. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2009;10(4):237–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Elman LB, Stanley L, Gibbons P, McCluskey L. A cost comparison of hospice care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and lung cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006;23(3):212–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Forshew DA, Bromberg MB. A survey of clinicians’ practice in the symptomatic treatment of ALS. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2003;4(4):258–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wasner M, Klier H, Borasio GD. The use of alternative medicine by patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2001;191(1–2):151–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lechtzin N, Wiener CM, Clawson L, Chaudhry V, Diette GB. Hospitalization in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: causes, costs, and outcomes. Neurology. 2001;56(6):753–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Munsat TL, Rivière M, Swash M, Leclerc C. Economic burden of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the United Kingdom. J Med Econ. 1998;1(1–4):235–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Klein LM, Forshew DA. The economic impact of ALS. Neurology. 1996;47(4 Suppl 2):S126–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sevick MA, Kamlet MS, Hoffman LA, Rawson I. Economic cost of home-based care for ventilator-assisted individuals. Chest. 1996;109(6):1597–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Moss AH, Oppenheimer EA, Casey P, Cazzolli PA, Roos RP, Stocking CB, Siegler M. Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis receiving long-term mechanical ventilation. Advance care planning and outcomes. Chest. 1996;110(1):249–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kiebert GM, Green C, Murphy C, Mitchell JD, O’Brien M, Burrell A, Leigh PN. Patients’ health-related quality of life and utilities associated with different stages of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci. 2001;191(1–2):87–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jones AR, Jivraj N, Balendra R, Murphy C, Kelly J, Thornhill M, Young C, Shaw PJ, Leigh PN, Turner MR, Steen IN, McCrone P, Al-Chalabi A. Health utility decreases with increasing clinical stage in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2014;15(3–4):285–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Riviere M, Meininger V, Zeisser P, Munsat T. An analysis of extended survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis treated with riluzole. Arch Neurol. 1998;55(4):526–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lacomblez L, Bensimon G, Leigh PN, Guillet P, Powe L, Durrleman S, Delumeau JC, Meininger V. A confirmatory dose-ranging study of riluzole in ALS. Neurology. 1996;47(6 Suppl 4):S242–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bensimon G, Lacomblez L, Meininger V. A controlled trial of riluzole in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. ALS/Riluzole Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(9):585–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lai EC, Felice KJ, Festoff BW, Gawel MJ, Gelinas DF, Kratz R, Murphy MF, Natter HM, Norris FH, Rudnicki SA. Effect of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I on progression of ALS: a placebo-controlled study. Neurology. 1997;49(6):1621–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bradley W. A controlled trial of recombinant methionyl human BDNF in ALS: the BDNF Study Group (Phase III). Neurology. 1999;52(7):1427–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Latimer N. NICE DSU technical support document 14: survival analysis for economic evaluations alongside clinical trials—extrapolation with patient-level data. Report by the Decision Support Unit; 2014.

  59. Henriques A, Pitzer C, Schneider A. Neurotrophic growth factors for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: where do we stand? Front Neurosci. 2010;4:32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Mitsumoto H. ALS clinical trials. https://psg-mac43.ucsf.edu/als/Mitsumoto,%20H%20(AAN)%208BS-006-97.pdf. Accessed 3 Aug 2016.

  61. Goutman SA, Chen KS, Feldman EL. Recent advances and the future of stem cell therapies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12(2):428–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Scarrott JM, Herranz-Martín S, Alrafiah AR, Shaw PJ, Azzouz M. Current developments in gene therapy for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015;15(7):935–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Al-Janabi H, Flynn TN, Coast J. QALYs and carers. Pharmacoeconomics. 2011;29(12):1015–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Rowen D, Dixon S, Hernández-Alava M, Mukuria C. Estimating informal care inputs associated with EQ-5D for use in economic evaluation. Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17(6):733–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Tranmer JE, Guerriere DN, Ungar WJ, Coyte PC. Valuing patient and caregiver time: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(5):449–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Epton J, Harris R, Jenkinson C. Quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease: a structured review. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2009;10(1):15–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Jenkinson C, Peters M, Bromberg MB. Quality of life measurement in neurodegenerative and related conditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  68. Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, Swinburn P, Busschbach J. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1717–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Greene ME, Rader KA, Garellick G, Malchau H, Freiberg AA, Rolfson O. The EQ-5D-5L improves on the EQ-5D-3L for health-related quality-of-life assessment in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(11):3383–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Beusterien K, Leigh N, Jackson C, Miller R, Mayo K, Revicki D. Integrating preferences into health status assessment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: the ALS utility index. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2005;6(3):169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Goldstein LH, Adamson M, Jeffrey L, Down K, Barby T, Wilson C, Leigh PN. The psychological impact of MND on patients and carers. J Neurol Sci. 1998;160(Suppl 1):S114–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Goldstein LH, Adamson M, Barby T, Down K, Leigh PN. Attributions, strain and depression in carers of partners with MND: a preliminary investigation. J Neurol Sci. 2000;180(1–2):101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Lerum SV, Solbrække KN, Frich JC. Family caregivers’ accounts of caring for a family member with motor neurone disease in Norway: a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care. 2016;15:22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Hawton A, Shearer J, Goodwin E, Green C. Squinting through layers of fog: assessing the cost effectiveness of treatments for multiple sclerosis. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11(4):331–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Knapp M, Iemmi V, Romeo R. Dementia care costs and outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;28(6):551–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Trajectories of Outcomes in Neurological Conditions (TONiC). https://tonic.thewaltoncentre.nhs.uk/tonic-mnd. Accessed 6 Aug 2016.

Download references

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Motor Neurone Disease Association UK for their funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dyfrig A. Hughes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AM, CAY and DH declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Contributions

AM, CAY and DH contributed substantially to the conception and design of the work. All authors made contributions to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. AM drafted the paper and all authors revised it critically for important intellectual content, and gave their final approval of the version to be published. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moore, A., Young, C.A. & Hughes, D.A. Economic Studies in Motor Neurone Disease: A Systematic Methodological Review. PharmacoEconomics 35, 397–413 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0478-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0478-9

Keywords

Navigation