Skip to main content
Log in

A New Reversible and Potent P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist (ACT-246475): Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics in a First-in-Man Trial

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objectives

ACT-246475 is a new reversible, selective, and potent antagonist of the platelet P2Y12 receptor. This study was a first-in-man trial investigating the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single oral doses of ACT-246475 and its di-ester prodrug (ACT-281959) in healthy males.

Methods

The study had a double-blind, randomized, ascending single-dose design with an oral formulation F1 (i.e., ACT-281959 or placebo) (Part I) and an open-label, randomized, 3-period, crossover design comparing exploratory formulations of ACT-281959 (F2) 70 mg and ACT-246475 (dF) 50 mg to F1 70 mg (Part II). In Part I, doses up to 1,000 mg were tested in 40 healthy subjects. Nine healthy subjects were enrolled in Part II. Standard safety parameters, inhibition of platelet aggregation, and ACT-246475 plasma concentrations were measured. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed.

Results

All doses and formulations were well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was headache, whereas no events of bleeding or dyspnea were reported. In Part I, ACT-246475 area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased dose-proportionally whereas maximum plasma concentration (C max) was less than dose-proportional. The highest C max [geometric mean (95 % CI)] at 1,000 mg was 13.8 (9.7, 19.5) pmol/mL at 4.5 h post-dose, terminal half-life (t ½) was ~10 h. ACT–246475 C max and AUC0–∞ ratios of geometric means (90 % CI) using F1 as reference, for F2 were 8.5 (5.42, 13.35) and 3.4 (2.40, 4.82), respectively, and for dF 2.2 (1.42, 3.49) and 1.5 (1.07, 2.16), respectively. Mean peak platelet inhibition was 31.0 % after F1 (1,000 mg) and 47.8 % after F2.

Conclusions

Oral doses of ACT-281959 and ACT-246475 were well tolerated. Platelet inhibition correlated with ACT-246475 exposure. Exploratory formulations enhanced the bioavailability and antiplatelet effect of ACT-246475.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davies MJ, Thomas AC, Knapman PA, Hangartner JR. Intramyocardial platelet aggregation in patients with unstable angina suffering sudden ischemic cardiac death. Circulation. 1986;73:418–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Michelson AD. Antiplatelet therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:154–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Davi G, Patrono C. Platelet activation and atherothrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2482–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Montalescot G. Platelet biology and implications for antiplatelet therapy in atherothrombotic disease. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011;17:371–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 2004;110:e82–292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith SC Jr, Allen J, Blair SN, Bonow RO, Brass LM, Fonarow GC, et al. AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update: endorsed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Circulation. 2006;113:2363–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;123:426–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorsam RT, Kunapuli SP. Central role of the P2Y12 receptor in platelet activation. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:340–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Minno MN, Guida A, Camera M, Colli S, Minno GD, Tremoli E. Overcoming limitations of current antiplatelet drugs: a concerted effort for more profitable strategies of intervention. Ann Med. 2011;43:531–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Andre P, Delaney SM, LaRocca T, Vincent D, DeGuzman F, Jurek M, et al. P2Y12 regulates platelet adhesion/activation, thrombus growth, and thrombus stability in injured arteries. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:398–406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vivas D, Angiolillo DJ. Platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibition: an update on clinical drug development. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10:217–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jernberg T, Payne CD, Winters KJ, Darstein C, Brandt JT, Jakubowski JA, et al. Prasugrel achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and a lower rate of non-responders compared with clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1166–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wallentin L, Varenhorst C, James S, Erlinge D, Braun OO, Jakubowski JA, et al. Prasugrel achieves greater and faster P2Y12 receptor-mediated platelet inhibition than clopidogrel due to more efficient generation of its active metabolite in aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:21–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, Fox KK. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:494–502.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fox KA, Mehta SR, Peters R, Zhao F, Lakkis N, Gersh BJ, et al. Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) Trial. Circulation. 2004;110:1202–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Crouch MA, Colucci VJ, Howard PA, Spinler SA. P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: integrating ticagrelor into the management of acute coronary syndrome. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45:1151–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Caroff E, Meyer E, Treiber A, Hilpert K, Riederer MA. Optimization of 2-phenyl-pyrimidine-4-carboxamides towards potent, orally bioavailable and selective P2Y12 antagonists for inhibition of platelet aggregation. Bioorgan Med Chem Lett. 2014;24:4323–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fung EN, Zheng N, Arnold ME, Zeng J. Effective screening approach to select esterase inhibitors used for stabilizing ester-containing prodrugs analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Bioanalysis. 2010;2:733–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. FDA Guidance for Industry Bioanalytical Method Validation. 2001; Available from: 2001 May. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/…/Guidances/ucm070107.pdf. Accessed 10 Jul 2011.

  21. EMA. Guideline on Validation of Bioanalytical Methods 2009; Available from 15 Nov 2009. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/12/WC500018062.pdf. Accessed 10 Jul 2011.

  22. Gough K, Hutschinson M, Keene O, et al. Assessment of dose proportionality: report from the statisticians in the pharmaceutical industry/pharmacokinetics UK joint working party. Drug Inform J 1995;29:1039–48.

  23. Julious SA, Debarnot CA. Why are pharmacokinetic data summarized by arithmetic means? J Biopharm Stat. 2000;10:55–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Michelson AD. Methods for the measurement of platelet function. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:20A–6A.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pittens CA, Bouman HJ, van Werkum JW, ten Berg JM, Hackeng CM. Comparison between hirudin and citrate in monitoring the inhibitory effects of P2Y12 receptor antagonists with different platelet function tests. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:1929–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gast A, Tschopp TB, Schmid G, Hilpert K, Ackermann J. Inhibition of clot-bound and free (fluid-phase thrombin) by a novel synthetic thrombin inhibitor (Ro 46-6240), recombinant hirudin and heparin in human plasma. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1994;5:879–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lunn DJTA, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS—a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput. 2000;10:325–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Teng R, Mitchell P, Butler K. Effect of age and gender on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single ticagrelor dose in healthy individuals. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68:1175–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Meunier V, Bourrie M, Berger Y, Fabre G. The human intestinal epithelial cell line Caco-2; pharmacological and pharmacokinetic applications. Cell Biol Toxicol. 1995;11:187–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Breet NJ, van Werkum JW, Bouman HJ, Kelder JC, Ruven HJ, Bal ET, et al. Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. JAMA. 2010;303:754–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gremmel T, Steiner S, Seidinger D, Koppensteiner R, Panzer S, Kopp CW. Comparison of methods to evaluate clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition after percutaneous intervention with stent implantation. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101:333–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Michelson AD, Frelinger AL 3rd, Furman MI. Current options in platelet function testing. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:4N–10N.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The contributions of Ines Paule, PhD (Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd) for the design and execution of the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis, of Swiss Bioanalytics AG for the bioanalysis of pharmacokinetic samples, of Alexander Treiber, PhD (Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd) for the nonclinical (in vitro and in vivo) pharmacokinetic studies, and of Eva Caroff (Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd) for providing the chemical structures of the active and the prodrugs are acknowledged. The study was funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. D. Baldoni, S. Bruderer, M. Gutierrez, and J. Dingemanse contributed to the study design and the analysis and interpretation of the data. A. Krause contributed to the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis and outputs; P. Gueret contributed to the setting and the validation of the pharmacodynamic methods and the analysis of the pharmacodynamic clinical data; B. Astruc was the Principal Investigator and was responsible for the conduct of the study and the collection and interpretation of the data. All authors contributed to the preparation and review of the manuscript and approved the final version for submission.

Conflict of interest

The study was funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. D. Baldoni, S. Bruderer, A. Krause, M. Gutierrez, P. Gueret, B. Astruc, and J. Dingemanse had support from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd for the submitted work; D. Baldoni, S. Bruderer, A. Krause, M. Gutierrez, and J. Dingemanse were full-time employees of Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd at the time of the study, B. Astruc is a full-time employee of Biotrial, which received funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, P. Gueret is a subcontracted consultant of Biotrial; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Ethical standards

The study was conducted in full conformity with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, the EMA Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practice (CPMP/ICH/135/95), and the laws and regulations of France. The Ouest VI Committee for the Protection of Persons (Ethics Committee) located in Brest (France) approved the study protocol (approval number: CPP Ouest 6 - 701) and all subjects gave written informed consent after full explanation of the research involved and prior to any screening procedures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Baldoni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baldoni, D., Bruderer, S., Krause, A. et al. A New Reversible and Potent P2Y12 Receptor Antagonist (ACT-246475): Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics in a First-in-Man Trial. Clin Drug Investig 34, 807–818 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-014-0236-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-014-0236-8

Keywords

Navigation