Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Simulation Study of FMS Under Routing and Part Mix Flexibility

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies the performance of a flexible manufacturing system under different manufacturing strategies. Manufacturing strategies under consideration are manufacturing flexibility, lot size and scheduling of jobs in the system. The impact of all these strategies is evaluated on the make-span performance of the flexible manufacturing system. The methodologies involved include simulation, Taguchi experimental design and analyzing the results with help of ANOVA. Number of different simulation models is developed with the help of JAVA language. The first model relates to the manufacturing system, which is conventional in nature without any flexibility embedded in the system. The second model takes into partial manufacturing flexibility in the form of routing flexibility. Finally, the third models incorporate much higher level of routing flexibility. All these models are further evaluated at different level of part mix flexibility. Also the scheduling of parts is considered with the objective of minimizing the total make-span time of parts. The results show that considering different manufacturing strategies decisions in a simultaneous manner can significantly improve the performance of the flexible manufacturing systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abou G. M., Motavalli, S., Nawara, G., Reyad, A. (2000). An integrated planning system for tool management and part scheduling in FMS. In 4th International conference on engineering design and automation, Orlando, FL.

  • Alcaide, D., Gonzates, A. R., & Silcilik, J. (2006). A heuristic approach to minimize expected makespan in open shops subject to stochastic processing times and failures. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing System, 17(3), 201–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M. (2012). Impact of routing and pallet flexibility on flexible manufacturing system. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 13(3), 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M. (2013). Information based decision and control in flexible manufacturing systems. Industrial Engineering Journal, 6(6), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M., Salahuddin, & Khan, M. A. (2010). Analysis of the impact of routing flexibility on the performance of flexible system. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 17(4), 269–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M., & Wadhwa, S. (2005). Performance analysis of partial flexible manufacturing system. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 6(1), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M., & Wadhwa, S. (2010). The effect of routing flexibility on a flexible system of integrated manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 48(19), 5691–5709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azimi, P., Haleh, H., & Alidoost, M. (2010). The selection of the best control rule for a multiple-load AGV system using simulation and Fuzzy MADM in a flexible manufacturing system. Modelling and Simulation Engineering, 2010, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, M., & Sapir, D. E. (2003). Flexibility in logistic systems modeling and performance evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjaafar, S. (1994). Models for performance evaluation of flexibility in manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Research, 2(6), 1383–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boctor, F. F., Renaud, J., Ruiz, A., & Tremblay, S. (2009). Optimal and heuristic solution methods for a multi processor machine scheduling problem. Computers & Operations Research, 36(10), 2822–2828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, M., & Jaber, M. J. (2013). Developing an input–output activity matrix (IOAM) for environmental and economic analysis of manufacturing systems and logistics chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 143, 589–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J. D., Dubois, K. R., Seth, S. P., & Stecke, K. E. (1984). Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. The FMS Magazine, 2(2), 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, W., & Albert, L. (1999). A strategic investment model for phased implementation of flexible manufacturing systems. International Transaction in Operational Research, 6, 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprihan, R., & Wadhwa, S. (1997). Impact of routing flexibility on the performance of an FMS—A simulation study. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 9, 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesar, C., & Ana, V. L. (2010). An examination of the relationship between manufacturing flexibility and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(8), 853–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T. S. (2001). The effects of routing on a manufacturing system. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(5), 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T. S. (2004). Impact of operation flexibility and dispatching rules on the performance of a flexible manufacturing system. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 24(5/6), 447–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T. S., Bhagwat, R., & Wadhwa, S. (2008). Comparative performance analysis of a flexible manufacturing system: A review-period-based control. International Journal of Production Research, 46(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F. T. S., & Chan, H. K. (2004). A comprehensive survey and future trend of simulation study on FMS scheduling. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 15, 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F., & Swarnkar, R. (2006). Ant colony optimization approach to a fuzzy goal programming model for a machine tool selection and operation allocation problem in an FMS. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 22, 353–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmekkawy, T. Y., & Elmaraghy, H. A. (2003). Efficient search of petri nets for deadlock-free scheduling in FMSs using heuristic functions. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1, 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, U. (2010). Petri net versus queuing theory for evaluation of flexible manufacturing system. Advances in Production Engineering and Management, 5, 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, N., Zhang, D. Z., & Li, Q. (2014). Agent-based hierarchical production planning and scheduling in make-to-order manufacturing system. International Journal of Production Economics, 149, 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlupic, V., & Paul, R. J. (1994). Simulation modelling of flexible manufacturing systems using activity cycle diagrams. Journal of Operational Research Society, 45(9), 1011–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, O. A., & Sridharan, R. (2011). Effects of routing flexibility, sequencing flexibility and scheduling decision rules on the performance of a flexible manufacturing system. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 56, 291–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koulumas, C., & Kyparisis, G. J. (2004). Concurrent flow shop scheduling to minimize makespan. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 524–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, G. Y. J., & Solberg, J. J. (1991). Effectiveness of flexible routing control. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing System, 3, 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagarjuna, N., Mahesh, O., & Rajgopal, K. (2006). A heuristic based on multistage programming approach for machine-loading problem in a flexible manufacturing system. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 22(4), 342–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. P., & Wirth, A. (1999). Manufacturing flexibility: Measures and relationships. European Journal of Operational Research, 118(3), 429–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phadke, M. S. (1989). Quality engineering using robust design. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2011). Modelling of FMS control policy: AIS-based fuzzy expert system. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 8(1), 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, R. K. (1990). A primer on the taguchi method. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

  • Sabuncuoglu, I., & Lahmar, M. (2003). An evaluation study of operations grouping policies in an FMS. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 15, 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, A. K., & Sethi, S. P. (1990). Flexibility in manufacturing: A survey. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 2, 289–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafiq, I. S., Faheem, M., & Ali, M. (2010). Effect of scheduling and manufacturing flexibility on the performance of FMS. Global Journal of Flexible System Management, 11(3), 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singholi, A., Ali, M., & Sharma, C. (2012). Impact of manufacturing flexibility on FMS performance: A simulation study. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 10(1), 96–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singholi, A., Chhabra, D., & Ali, M. (2010). Towards improving the performance of flexible manufacturing system: A case study. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 3, 87–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stecke, K. E. (1983). Design. Planning, scheduling and control problems of flexible manufacturing system, annals of operational research, 3(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa, S., & Bhagwat, R. (1998). Judicious increase in flexibility and decision automation in semi-computerized flexible manufacturing (SCFM) systems, international, journal. Studies in Informatics and Control, 2(8).

  • Wadhwa, S., Ducq, Y., Ali, M., & Prakash, A. (2008). Performance analysis of a flexible manufacturing system under planning and control strategies. International Journal, Studies in Informatics and Control, 17(3), 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa, S., Ducq, Y., Ali, M., & Prakash, A. (2009). Performance analysis of flexible manufacturing system. Global Journal of Flexible System Management, 10(3), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yildrim, M. B., Dergue, U., Cakar, T., & Meza, J. C. (2006). Machine number priority rule and due date determination in flexible manufacturing systems using artificial networks. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 50(1/2), 184–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Vordercmese, M. A., & Lim, J. S. (2003). Manufacturing flexibility defining and analyzing relationship among competence, capacity and customer satisfaction. Journal of Operational Management, 21, 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India

    Mohammed Ali & Zameer Ahmad

Authors
  1. Mohammed Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zameer Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, M., Ahmad, Z. A Simulation Study of FMS Under Routing and Part Mix Flexibility. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 15, 277–294 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-014-0071-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-014-0071-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation