Abstract
Compacted fine-grained soils are widely used in the construction of geotechnical infrastructures such as the embankments, retaining walls and pavements. These infrastructures are typically constructed at a relatively fast rate such that the pore-water phase is not allowed to drain, or under constant water content (CW) condition. The mechanical behaviour of compacted fine-grained soils under CW condition should be well understood in addition to various other loading conditions for rational design of geotechnical infrastructures. In this study, compacted soil specimens of a residual gneiss from Brazil were tested using a conventional triaxial testing equipment under CW condition. A high capacity tensiometer was used to measure the matric suction in the compacted soil specimens. Three groups of soil specimens compacted at different initial water contents representing dry of optimum, optimum and wet of optimum conditions were tested to study the influence of soil structure on the matric suction development in the soil specimens during testing. The test results suggest that the matric suction changes in the soil under CW condition depend mainly on the volume change behavior, which is influenced by the level of confining pressure, the degree of saturation and the soil structure. The simple conventional triaxial testing equipment has been found to be useful for determining the mechanical behavior of compacted fine-grained soils under CW condition with the aid of a high capacity tensiometer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bishop AW (1960) The principle of effective stress. Tek Ukebl 106(39):859–863
Chen CL, Zhang DF, Dong YZ, Chen H, Yu DB, Xue JX (2006) Suction and mechanical behaviors of unsaturated intact loess from constant water content triaxial tests. Chin J Geotech Eng 36(7):1195–1202 (in Chinese)
Colmenares JE, Ridley AM (2002) Stress–strain and strength relationships for a reconstituted clayey silt. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on unsaturated soils, Recife, Brazil
Elkady TY, Al-Mahbashi AM (2012) Effect of vertical stress on the soil water characteristic curve of highly expansive soils. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on unsaturated soils, Napoli, Italy
Fredlund DG, Morgenstern NR (1977) Stress state variables for unsaturated soils. J Geotech Eng Div 103(5):447–466
Fredlund DG, Rahardjo H (1993) Soil mechanics for unsaturated soils. Wiley, New York
Guan Y, Fredlund DG (1997) Use of the tensile strength of water for the direct measurement of high oil suction. Can Geotech J 34:604–614
Jahangir E, Nowamooz H, Masrouri F (2012) Effect of density in the water retention curve of a compacted silt–bentonite mixture. In: Proceedings of the second European conference on unsaturated soils, Napoli, Italy
Jotisankasa A, Coop M, Ridley A (2009) The mechanical behavior of an unsaturated compacted silty clay. Géotechnique 59(5):415–428
Kuwagima RM (2000) Determinação da Sucção “in situ” em Solo Residual Compactado Utilizando-se o Parâmetro B e a Medição Direta da Sucção. Dissertação apresentada a Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo
Marinho FAM, Stuermer MM (2002) The influence of the compaction energy on the SWCC of a residual soil. In: Proceedings of Advances in Unsaturated Geotechnics. Geotechnical Special Publication 99, ASCE, Reston, pp 125–141
Marinho FAM, Oliveira OM, Vanapalli SK, Adem H (2011) Mechanical behavior of an unsaturated compacted residual soil. In: Proceedings of the 14th Pan-Am CGS geotechnical conference, Toronto, Canada
Marinho FAM, Oliveira OM, Adem H, Vanapalli SK (2013) Shear strength behavior of compacted residual soil. Int J Geotech Eng 7(1):1–9
Meilani I, Rahardjo H, Leong EC, Fredlund DG (2002) Mini suction probe for matric suction measurements. Can Geotech J 39:1427–1432
Miller GA, Khoury CN, Muraleetharan KK, Liu CY, Kibbey TCG (2008) Effects of soil skeleton deformations on hysteretic soil water characteristic curves: experiments and simulations. Water Resour Res 44:1–10
Ng CWW, Pang YW (2000) Influence of stress state on soil–water characteristics and slope stability. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126:157–166
Oliveira OM, Marinho FAM (2008) Suction equilibration time for a high capacity tensiometer. Geotech Test J 31(1):101–105
Rahardjo H, Heng OB, Leong EC (2004) Shear strength of a compacted residual soil from consolidation drained and constant water content triaxial tests. Can Geotech J 41:421–436
Ridley A, Burland JB (1993) A new instructument for the measurement of soil moisture suction. Géotechnique 43(2):321–324
Stuermer MM (1998) Estudo da Capacidade de Retenção de Água em um Solo Residual Compactado. Dissertação apresentada a Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo
Sun DA, Li J (2009) Main factors affecting soil–water characteristic curve. In: Proceedings of the 4th Asian Pacific conference on unsaturated soils, Newcastle, UK
Thu TM, Rahardjo H, Leong EC (2006) Shear strength and pore-water pressure characteristics during constant water content triaxial tests. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:411–419
Vanapalli SK, Fredlund DG (1997) Interpretation of undrained shear strength of unsaturated soils in terms of stress state variables. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Brazilian symposium on unsaturated soils, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Vanapalli SK, Fredlund DG, Pufahl DE (1999) The influence of soil structure and stress history on the soil–water characteristics of a compacted till. Géotechnique 2:143–159
Vieira AM (1999) Variação Sazonal da Sucção em um Talude de Solo Residual de Gnaisse. Dissertação apresentada a Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo
Yang H, Rahardjo H, Leong EC, Fredlund DG (2004) Factors affecting drying and wetting soil–water characteristic curves of sandy soils. Can Geotech J 41:908–920
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Oliveira, O.M., Li, P., Marinho, F.A.M. et al. Mechanical Behaviour of a Compacted Residual Soil of Gneiss from Brazil under Constant Water Content Condition. Indian Geotech J 46, 299–308 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-016-0190-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-016-0190-x