Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Analysis of the Stress Distribution in Symmetrical Backfilled Trenches with Inclined Walls

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Backfilled trenches are commonly used for municipal and industrial services such as gas, drinking water and sewers. Their design involves the determination of the stresses imposed due to the fill material, which requires a good understanding of the interaction between the backfill and abutment walls. In practice, such stresses (or loads) are often estimated using an analytical solution proposed by Marston, based on the arching theory with a constant earth pressure coefficient. However, a number of influencing factors are neglected when using this approach. This paper investigates the effect of key factors on the stress distribution in symmetrical backfilled trenches with inclined walls, through a series of numerical simulations. The results presented here illustrate how the vertical and horizontal stresses distribution is affected by the trench geometry, including its width and wall inclination, and by the backfill properties. Results from this numerical investigation show that the application of the basic Marston’s solution can lead to a significant underestimation of the stresses, particularly in the lower part of a trench. The magnitude of the undervaluation is more pronounced when the stiffness contrast between the backfill and wall material is small. The simulations further indicate that the earth pressure coefficient K varies with depth and wall inclination, indicating that using a constant value of K may not be appropriate for trenches with inclined walls. A discussion follows on the significance and limitations of this work, and on additional factors that can influence the stress state in backfilled trenches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Handy RL (1985) The arch in soil arching. ASCE J Geotech Eng 111(3):302–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunt RE (1986) Geotechnical engineering analysis and evaluation. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sperl M (2006) Experiments on corn pressure in silo cells: translation and comment of Janssen’s paper from 1895. Granul Matter 8:59–65

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Richmond O, Gardner GC (1962) Limiting spans for arching of bulk materials in vertical channels. Chem Eng Sci 17:1071–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Richards JC (1966) The storage and recovery of particulate solids. Institution of Chemical Engineers, London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cowin SC (1977) The theory of static loads in bins. J Appl Mech 44:409–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blight GE (1986) Pressure exerted by materials stored in silos: part I, coarse materials. Géotech 36(1):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blight GE (1986) Pressure exerted by materials stored in silos: part II, fine powders. Géotech 36(1):47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blight GE (2006) Assessing loads on silos and other bulk storage structures: research applied to practice. Taylor & Francis/Balkema, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  10. Drescher A (1991) Analytical methods in bin-load analysis. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng YM, Liu ZN, Song WD, Au SK (2009) Laboratory test and particle flow simulation of silos problem with non homogeneous materials. ASCE J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(11):1754–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang YZ (2000) Distribution of earth pressure on retaining wall. Géotech 50(1):83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Take WA, Valsangkar AJ (2001) Earth pressures on unyielding retaining walls of narrow backfill width. Can Geotech J 38:1220–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paik KH, Salgado R (2003) Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects. Géotech 53(7):643–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goel S, Patra NR (2008) Effect of arching on active earth pressure for rigid retaining walls considering translation mode. ASCE Int J Geomech 8(2):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fan CC, Fang YS (2010) Numerical solution of active earth pressures on rigid retaining walls built near rock faces. Comput Geotech 37:1023–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Greco V (2013) Active thrust on retaining walls of narrow backfill width. Comput Geotech 50:66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dalvi RS, Pise PJ (2012) Analysis of arching in soil-passive state. Indian Geotech J 42(2):106–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dalvi RS, Bhosale SS, Pise PJ (2005) Analysis for passive earth pressure: catenary arch in soil. Indian Geotech J 35(4):388–400

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hustrulid W, Qianyuan Y, Krauland N (1989) Modeling of cut-and-fill mining systems: Näsliden revisited. In: Hassani FP, Scoble MJ, Yu TR (eds) Innovation in mining backfill technology. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 147–164

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aubertin M, Li L, Arnoldi S, Belem T, Bussière B, Benzaazoua M, Simon R (2003) Interaction between backfill and rock mass in narrow stopes. In: Culligan PJ, Einstein HH, Whittle AJ (eds) Soil and rock America 2003. Verlag Glückauf Essen (VGE), Essen

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li L, Aubertin M, Simon R, Bussière B, Belem T (2003) Modeling arching effects in narrow backfilled stopes with FLAC. In: Brummer R, Andrieux P, Detournay C, Hart R (eds) FLAC and numerical modeling in geomechanics: 2003. Lisse, A.A Balkema, pp 211–219

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li L, Aubertin M, Belem T (2005) Formulation of a three dimensional analytical solution to evaluate stresses in backfilled vertical narrow openings. Can Geotech J 42:1705–1717 (with Erratum 2006;43:338-339)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li L, Aubertin M (2008) An improved analytical solution to estimate the stress state in sub-vertical backfilled stopes. Can Geotech J 45(10):1487–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li L, Aubertin M (2009) Influence of water pressure on the stress state in stopes with cohesionless backfill. Geotech Geol Eng 27(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li L, Aubertin M (2009) A three-dimensional analysis of the total and effective normal stresses in submerged backfilled stopes. Geotech Geol Eng 27(4):559–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li L, Aubertin M (2009) Numerical investigation of the stress state in inclined backfilled stopes. ASCE Int J Geomech 9(2):52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li L, Aubertin M (2010) An analytical solution for the nonlinear distribution of effective and total stresses in vertical backfilled stopes. Geomech Geoeng 5(4):237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Grabinsky MW. Keynote address: in situ monitoring for groundtruthing paste backfill designs. In: Proceedings of 13th International Seminar Paste and Thickened Tailings, Toronto, 3–6 May 2010

  30. Ting CH, Shukla SK, Sivakugan N (2011) Arching in soils applied to inclined mine stopes. ASCE Int J Geomech 11(1):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Thompson BD, Bawden WF, Grabinsky MW (2012) In situ measurements of cemented paste backfill at the Cayeli Mine. Can Geotech J 49:755–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sivakugan N, Widisinghe S (2013) Stresses within granular materials contained between vertical walls. Indian Geotech J 43(1):30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Widisinghe S, Sivakugan N, Wang VZ (2013) Laboratory investigations of arching in backfilled mine stopes. In: Leung CF, Goh SH, Shen RF (eds) Advances in geotechnical infrastructure 2013. Research Publishing, Bescia, pp 741–746

    Google Scholar 

  34. Spangler MG, Handy RL (1984) Soil engineering. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. McCarthy DF (1988) Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  36. Moore ID (2001) Buried pipes and culverts. In: Rowe RK (ed) Geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering handbook. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Norwell, pp 541–567

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Brachman RWI, Krushelnitzky RP (2005) Response of a landfill drainage pipe buried in a trench. Can Geotech J 42:752–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Whidden WR (2009) Buried flexible steel pipe: design and structure analysis. Hardcover, ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice, p 119

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Shukla SK, Sivakugan N (2013) Load coefficient for ditch conduits covered with geosynthetic-reinforced granular material. ASCE Int J Geomech 13(1):76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Marston A (1930) The theory of external loads on closed conduits in the light of latest experiments. Iowa Engineering Experiment Station, Ames Bulletin No. 96

    Google Scholar 

  41. Janssen HA (1895) Versuche über Getreidedruck in Silozellen. Zeitschrift Verein Ingenieure 39:1045–1049

    Google Scholar 

  42. Handy RL, Spangler MG (2007) Geotechnical engineering: soil and foundation principles. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pirapakaran K, Sivakugan N (2007) Arching within hydraulic fill stopes. Geotech Geol Eng 25(1):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shukla SK, Gaurav S, Sivakugan N (2009) A simplified extension of the conventional theory of arching in soils. Int J Geotech Eng 3(3):353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shukla SK, Loughran JG, Sivakugan N (2009) Stress within a cohesionless granular fill in a storage vessel with sloping walls during initial static loading. Powder Technol 192:389–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Li L, Dubé JS, Aubertin M (2013) An extension of Marston’s solution for the stresses in backfilled trenches with inclined walls. Geotech Geol Eng 31:1027–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Li L, Dubé JS, Zangeneh-Madar Z (2012) Estimation of total and effective stresses in trenches with inclined walls. Int J Geotech Eng 6(4):525–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Singh S, Shukla S, Sivakugan N (2011) Arching in inclined and vertical mine stopes. Geotech Geol Eng 29(5):685–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Itasca (2002) FLAC—Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, User’s Guide, Version 5.0. Minneapolis, MN: Itasca Consulting Group

  50. Li L, Aubertin M (2009) An elastoplastic evaluation of the stress state around cylindrical openings based on a closed multiaxial yield surface. Int J Num Anal Meth Geomech 33(2):193–213

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Li L, Aubertin M, Shirazi A (2010) Implementation and application of a new elasto-plastic model based on a multiaxial criterion to assess the stress state near underground openings. ASCE Int J Geomech 10(1):13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ting CH, Sivakugan N, Shukla SK (2012) Laboratory simulation of the stresses within inclined stopes. Geotech Test J 35(2):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pirapakaran K, Sivakugan N (2007) A laboratory model to study arching within a hydraulic fill stope. Geotech Testing J 30(6):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jaky J (1944) The coefficient of earth pressure at rest. J Soc Hung Arch Eng 78(22):355–358

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sivakugan N, Widisinghe S, Wang VZ (2014) A note on vertical stress determination within the backfilled mine stopes. Int J Geomech 14(4):06014011-1–06014011-5

    Google Scholar 

  56. Li L, Aubertin JD, Dubé JS Pressure measurement in a silo backfilled with a cohesionless soil. In: 2012 International Conference Geomech Eng, Seoul, Korea, pp 1921–1933

  57. O’Neal TS, Hagerty DJ (2011) Earth pressures in confined cohesionless backfill against tall rigid walls: a case history. Can Geotech J 48:1188–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Li L, Aubertin JD, Dubé JS (2014) Stress distribution in a cohesionless backfill poured in a silo. Open Civ Eng J 8:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bowles JE (1984) Foundation analysis and design. McGraw Hill Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  60. McCarthy DF (2007) Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  61. Singh S, Sivakugan N, Shukla SK (2010) Can soil arching be insensitive to ϕ? ASCE Int J Geomech 10(3):124–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Blight G (2010) Geotechnical engineering for mine waste storage facilities. Taylor & Francis, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  63. Caceres C (2005) Effect of backfill on longhole open stoping, M.A.Sc Thesis, University of British Columbia

  64. Ting CH, Shukla SK, Sivakugan N (2011) Arching in soils applied to inclined mine stopes. Int J Geomech 11(1):29–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ting CH, Sivakugan N, Read W, Shukla SK (2014) Analytical expression for vertical stress within an inclined mine stope with non-parallel walls. Geotech Geol Eng 32:577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC RGPIN) and from the partners of the Research Institute on Mines and the Environment (RIME UQAT- Polytechnique; http://www.rime-irme.ca/). The anonymous reviewer is gratefully acknowledged for the comments and suggestions, which helped to improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Aubertin, M. Numerical Analysis of the Stress Distribution in Symmetrical Backfilled Trenches with Inclined Walls. Indian Geotech J 45, 278–290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-014-0131-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-014-0131-5

Keywords

Navigation