Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Warp Yarn Tension During Shedding: A Theoretical Approach

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series E Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretical investigation on the process of development of warp yarn tension during weaving for tappet shedding is carried out, based on the dynamic nature of shed geometry. The path of warp yarn on a weaving machine is divided into four different zones. The tension developed in each zone is estimated for every minute rotation of the bottom shaft. A model has been developed based on the dynamic nature of shed geometry and the possible yarn flow from one zone to another. A computer program, based on the model of shedding process, is developed for predicting the warp yarn tension variation during shedding. The output of the model and the experimental values of yarn tension developed in zone-D i.e. between the back rest and the back lease rod are compared, which shows a good agreement between them. The warp yarn tension values predicted by the model in zone-D are 10–13 % lesser than the experimentally measured values. By analyzing the theoretical data of the peak value of developed yarn tension at four zones i.e. zone-A, zone-B, zone-C and zone-D, it is observed that the peak yarn tension value of A, B, C-zones are much higher than the peak tension near the back rest i.e. at zone-D. It is about twice or more than the yarn tension near the back rest. The study also reveals that the developed yarn tension peak values are different for the extreme positions of a heald. The impact of coefficient of friction on peak value of yarn tension is nominal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

S:

Lift of the tappet

s:

Displacement of treadle bowl

m:

Slope of the falling/rising angle of the tappet

n:

Number of the heald shaft

θw :

Working angle of cam (rising or falling)

θd :

Dwell angle of cam (top or bottom)

d1 :

Diameter of small reversing roller

d2 :

Diameter of big reversing roller

x:

Distance between fulcrum to treadle bowl

y:

Distance between treadle bowl to front heald connection

z:

Distance between front and back healds (spacing of healds)

a:

Horizontal distance between cloth fell and heald shaft (zone A)

b:

Horizontal distance between heald shaft and front lease rod (zone B)

c:

Horizontal distance between lease rods (zone C)

d:

Horizontal distance between back lease rod and back rest (zone D)

α:

Angle made by the line joining centers of two elements carrying the yarn with the horizontal in different zones.

β:

Angle made by the line parallel to yarn axis in the straight portion with the line joining the centers of two elements carrying the yarn in different zones

A, B, C, D:

Half wrap angles on an element in the respective zones

W:

Total wrap angle on each element followed by subscript indicating the element

l:

Geometrical length of yarn in any zone (straight portion)

L:

Total geometrical length in any zone (including wrap length)

h:

Displacement of heald from the healds level position

h′:

Relative heights of two yarn carrying surfaces

hmin :

Displacement of heald when it is at its bottom most position

hmax :

Displacement of heald when it is at its top most position

t:

Length of heald eye

ry :

Yarn radius

rh :

Radius of heald eye surface that carries the yarn

rl :

Radius of lease rod

rb :

Radius of back rest

μm :

Coefficient of yarn–metal friction

h:

Heald

fl:

Front lease rod

bl:

Back lease rod

br:

Back rest

1:

First heald or front heald

2:

Second heald or back heald

References

  1. A.E. Owen, The Tension in a single warp thread during plain weaving. J. Text. Inst. (Trans.) 19, 365–388 (1928)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N.H. Chamberlain, D.C. Snowden, Variations in individual warp thread tension during weaving cycle. J. Text. Inst. (Trans.) 39(2), 23–43 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Greenwood, W.T. Cowhig, The position of cloth fell in power looms, part I: stable weaving conditions. J. Text. Inst. 47, T241 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Greenwood, W.T. Cowhig, The position of Cloth fell in power looms, part II: disturbed weaving conditions. J. Text. Inst. 47, T255 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B.V. Holcombe, R.E. Griffith, R. Postle, A study of weaving systems by means of dynamic warp and weft tension measurement. J. Text. Inst. 71, 1–5 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Weindorfer, Effects of shed formation on the loading of warp yarn. Indian J. Fiber Text. Res. 19(9), 139–146 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.C. Snowden, Some factors influencing the number of warp breakages in woolen and worsted weaving. J. Text. Inst. 40, 317–329 (1949)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Gu, Reduction of warp tension fluctuation and beat up strip width in weaving. Text. Res. J. 54(3), 143–148 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Wulfhorst, Simulation calculations as a development tool in weaving. Int. Text. Bull. 47(2), 54–58 (2001)

  10. M. Dayik, M.C. Kayacan, H. Calis, E. Cakmak, Control of warp tension during weaving procedure using evaluation programming. J. Text. Inst. 97(4), 313–324 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S.K. Dolecki, The causes of warp yarn breaks in the weaving of spun yarns. J. Text. Inst. 65, 68–74 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subrata Ghosh.

Appendices

Appendix A: The Formulation of Model for Development of Warp Yarn Tension during Shedding Process

Appendix B

r

r′ is the distance between two lines parallel to the yarn axis and passing through centers of circular surfaces carrying the yarn. This variable changes according to the arrangement of yarn on two surfaces. There are two possibilities arrangements;

  1. (i)

    When the yarn lies above and below the two surfaces (Fig. 18)

    Fig. 18
    figure 18

    Definition variables r′

  2. (ii)

    When the yarn lies either above or below both the surfaces where it is the difference between the two radii (Fig. 19).

    Fig. 19
    figure 19

    Definition of variable r′

h

h′ is the difference in heights of two yarn carrying surfaces (Fig. 20).

Fig. 20
figure 20

Definition of variable h′

α

α is the angle made by the line joining centers of two circular elements carrying the yarn with the horizontal line (Fig. 21).

$$ \alpha \, = { \tan }^{ - 1} \left( {{\text{h}}'/{\text{d}}} \right) $$
Fig. 21
figure 21

Definition of α

β

β is the angle made by the line parallel to yarn axis in the straight portion with the line joining the centers of two circular elements carrying the yarn (Fig. 22).

$$ \beta \, = { \tan }^{ - 1} \left( {{\text{PQ }}/{\text{ OQ}}} \right) \, = { \tan }^{ - 1} \left( {{\text{r}}'/{\text{l}}} \right) $$
Fig. 22
figure 22

Definition of β

Half Wrap Angle on an Element in a Zone (A/B/C/D)

It is the angle made by a line perpendicular to the yarn axis with the vertical line that divides two zones. For example half wrap angle in zone B is represented in the figure (Fig. 23).

Fig. 23
figure 23

Half wrap angle or wrap angle in a zone

Total Wrap Angle on an Element (W)

Wrap angle on any element that divides into two zones is the sum of the two half warp angles on either side of it (Fig. 24).

Fig. 24
figure 24

Definition of total wrap angle on an element

Geometrical Length of Yarn in a Zone (1)

It is the length of straight portion of yarn measured in any zone between two contacting points i.e., excluding the wrap length. It is represented by “l” in the chapters (Fig. 25).

Fig. 25
figure 25

Geometrical length of yarn

Total Geometrical Length of Yarn in a Zone (L)

It is the sum of straight length and wrap length calculated by multiplying warp angle with the radii of respective yarn holding elements. It is represented by “L” in the chapters. Say in zone B (Fig. 26).

Fig. 26
figure 26

Total geometrical length of a yarn in a zone

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghosh, S., Chary, P. & Roy, S. Development of Warp Yarn Tension During Shedding: A Theoretical Approach. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. E 96, 107–124 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40034-014-0044-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40034-014-0044-y

Keywords

Navigation