Abstract
This paper presents a comparative investigation of the shock tube and electronic detonating systems practised in bench blasting. The blast trials were conducted on overburden rocks of Garnet Biotite Sillimanite Gneiss formations in one of the largest metalliferous mine of India. The study revealed that the choice of detonating system was crucial in deciding the fragment size and its distribution within the blasted muck-piles. The fragment size and its distribution affected the digging rate of excavators. Also, the shape of the blasted muck-pile was found to be related to the degree of fragmentation. From the present work, it may be inferred that in electronic detonation system, timely release of explosive energy resulted in better overall blasting performance. Hence, the precision in delay time must be considered in designing blast rounds in such overburden rock formations. State-of-art image analysis, GPS based muck-pile profile plotting techniques were rigorously used in the investigation. The study revealed that a mean fragment size (K50) value for shock tube detonated blasts (0.55–0.59 m) was higher than that of electronically detonated blasts (0.43–0.45 m). The digging rate of designated shovels (34 m3) with electronically detonated blasts was consistently more than 5000 t/h, which was almost 13 % higher in comparison to shock tube detonated blasts. Furthermore, favourable muck-pile shapes were witnessed in electronically detonated blasts from the observations made on the dozer performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
B. Larsson, R. Holmberg, J. West berg, Super accurate detonators: a blaster’s dream, in Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Explosives and Blasting Techniques, Society of Explosives Engineers Annual Meeting, Anaheim, California, pp. 44–58
R.F. Chiappetta, Precision detonators and their applications in improving fragmentation, reducing ground vibrations and increasing reliability: a look into the future, in Fourth High-Tech Seminar, Blasting Technology, Instrumentation and Explosives Applications, Nashville, Tennessee, USA (1992) 20–25
S.K. Roy, R.P. Singh, Studies into firing accuracy of some Indian permitted electric detonators, in Performance of explosives and new developments, Explosive and explosion Laboratory, CIMFR, Dhanbad, Taylor and Francis group London ISBN 978-0-415-62142-7 (2013) pp. 57–62
L. Liu, P.D. Katsabanis, Numerical study of the effects of accurate timing on rock fragmentation. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34(5), 831–835 (1997)
A.K. Lal, M. Daripa, A. Kumar, V. Chittora, M.P. Roy, P.K. Singh, Blast optimization at Sindesar Khurd undergrounds mine to improve productivity with reduced level of vibration, in Rock Fragmentation by Blasting, ed. by Singh, Sinha (Taylor & Francis Group, London, 2013), pp. 231–240. ISBN 978-0-415-62143-4
Mario A. Morin, Ficarazzo Francesco, Monte Carlo simulation as a tool to predict blasting fragmentation based on the Kuz–Ram model. Comput. Geosci. 32, 352–359 (2005)
H.S. Yang, Rai Piyush, Characterization of fragment size vis-à-vis delay timing in quarry blasts. Powder Technol. 211(1), 120–126 (2011)
M.N. Bagde, A.K. Raina, A.K. Chakraborty, J.L. Jethwa, Rock mass characterization by fractal dimension. Eng. Geol. 63(1–2), 141–155 (2002)
A.K. Raina, M. Ramulu, P.B. Choudhury, A.K. Chakraborty, A. Sinha, B. Ramesh Kumar, M. Fazal, Productivity improvement in an opencast coal mine in India using digital image analysis technique, in J.A. Sanchidrian (ed.), Fragmentation by Blasting, Proceedings of the 9th Int. Symp. On Rock Fragmentation by Blasting—Fragblast 9, Sept. 13–17, Granada Spain (2010) pp. 707–716
P. Rai, F.L. Imperial, Mesh area vis-à-vis blast performance in a limestone quarry: a case study. Fragblast Int. J. Blasting Fragm. UK 9(4), 219–232 (2005)
S.P. Singh, T. Yalcin, Effect of muck size distribution on scooping operations. J. Int. Soc. Expl. Eng. 2002G, 315–325 (2002)
P. Rai, Evaluation of the effects of some blast design parameters on fragmentation in opencast mines, Ph. D. Thesis, 2002
S.S. Kanchibotla, Optimum blasting? Is it minimum cost per broken rock or maximum value per broken rock? in Proceedings of Explo-2001, Hunter Valley, NSW (2001) pp. 35–40
A. Marton, R. Crookes, A case study in optimising fragmentation. Aus. IMM Proc. 1, 35–43 (2000)
P.A. Persson, R. Holmberg, J. Lee, Rock Blasting and Explosive Engineering (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1994), pp. 163–164
Fu Hongxian, Wong Louis Ngai Yuen, Zhao Yong, Shen Zhou, Zhang Chengping, Li Yanzhi, Comparison of excavation damage zones resulting from blasting with nonel detonators and blasting with electronic detonators. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. (2013). doi:10.1007/s00603-013-0419-2
Acknowledgments
Authors extend their sincere gratitude towards the staff and management of the mine for rendering the admirable support and assistance during the study for the research project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sharma, S.K., Rai, P. Assessment of Blasting Performance Using Electronic Vis-à-Vis Shock Tube Detonators in Strong Garnet Biotite Sillimanite Gneiss Formations. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. D 97, 87–97 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-015-0078-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-015-0078-4