Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Green Cutting Fluid Selection using Multi-attribute Decision Making Approach

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Optimal cutting fluid selection for Green Manufacturing (GM) alleviates environmental burdens. In the traditional manufacturing system, the selection of cutting fluid is based on economic and technical factors. But the environmental factors play a vital role in green manufacturing process. Therefore, the selection of green cutting fluid depends on various attributes and it is a multi-attribute decision making process. In this work, a combined method of Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) with multi objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis has been developed for optimum selection of cutting fluid for green manufacturing that minimizes the environmental impact, cost and maximizes the quality. AHP method has been used to extract the precise value of each of the criterion which influences the assessment values for finding the optimal cutting fluid in this work. A case study of cutting fluid selection in the gear hobbing process has been presented to validate the proposed model. The research result shows that, Syntilo 9930c is the optimal cutting fluid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O. Cakir, A. Yardimeden, T. Ozben, E. Kilickap, Selection of cutting fluids in machining processes. J. Achievement Mater. Manuf. Eng. 25(2), 99–102 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Zust, G. Caduff, B. Schumacher, Life-cycle modeling as an instrument for life-cycle engineering. CIRP Ann-Manuf. Technol. 46(1), 351–354 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Sheng, M. Srinivasan, Multi-objective process planning in environmentally conscious manufacturing: a feature-based approach. CIRP Ann-Manuf. Technol. 44(1), 427–433 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ISO 14040: Environmental management life cycle assessment principles and framework, (1997)

  5. C.W. Lee, N.K. Kwak, Information resource planning for a health-care system using an AHP-based goal programming method. J. Oper. Res. Soci. 50, 1191–1198 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Meciarova, M. Stanovsky, Cutting fluids evaluation based on occupational health and environmental hazards. Eng. Rural Dev. 26, 418–422 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. T.L. Saaty, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Saket, V. Purbey, Jagadish, A. Ray, Multi attributes decision making for mobile phone selection. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 03(03), 497–501 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Multiple attribute decision making, a state of the art survey (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. L.I. Tong, C.C. Chen, C.H. Wang, Optimization of multi-response processes using the VIKOR method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 31, 1049–1057 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.L. Deng, Introduction to grey system. J. Grey Syst. 1(1), 1–24 (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Kumar, Jagadish, A. Ray, Selection of material: A multi-objective decision making approach. Presented at the International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE-2013), SVNIT, Surat, India, pp. 162–165 (2013)

  13. R. Kumar, Jagadish, A. Ray, Selection of cutting Tool Materials: A holistic approach. Presented at the 1st International Conference on Mechanical engineering emerging trends for sustainability, MANIT, Bhopal, India, pp. 447–452 (2014)

  14. P. Sheng, V. Carey, D. Bauer, S. Thurwachter, J. Creyts, D. Bennett, Environmental planning for machining operations and system. In: Proceedings of the 1998 NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees Conference, Monterrey, Mexico January (1998)

  15. Y. Yue, A comprehensive model for cutting fluid 1st information in machining. Ph.D. thesis, Michgen, Technological University USA (2000)

  16. J.W. Sutherland, An overview of environmentally conscious machining at Michigan Technological University (Presented to the Ford Motor Company, Livonia, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Domkondwar, N. Krishnan, Distributed modules in environmental part planning for machined components. CIRP Ann-Manuf. Technol. 327–239 (1998)

  18. A.C.K. Choi, H. Kaebernick, W.H. Lai, Manufacturing modelling for environmentally impact assessment. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 70(1–3), 231–238 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Sheng, M. Srinivasan, G. Chryssolouris, A hierarchical part planning strategies for environmentally conscious manufacturing. CIRP Ann-Manuf. Technol. 45(1), 455–460 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J.W. Sutherland, Activities in environmentally conscious design and manufacturing at MTU. invited presentation for USCAR’s (GM, Ford, Chrysler) Vehicle Recycling Partnership, Detroit, MI, (1995)

  21. M. Sokovic, K. Mijanovic, Ecological aspects of the cutting fluids and its influence on quantifiable parameters of the cutting processes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 109(1–2), 181–189 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S.M. Ali, N.R. Dhar, S.K. Dey, Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on cutting performance in turning medium carbon steel by uncoated carbide insert at different speed-feed combinations. Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag. 6(3), 185–196 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jagadish, A Ray, Cutting fluid selection for sustainable design for manufacturing: an integrated theory. Procedia Mater. Sci. (2014) (“In press”)

  24. Jagadish, A. Ray, Green cutting fluid selection using MOOSRA method. Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol. 03(03), 559–563 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. X.C. Tan, F. Liu, H.J. Cao, H. Zhang, A decision-making framework model of cutting fluid selection for green manufacturing and a case study. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 129, 467–470 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Prasad, C. Shankar, Application of multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) method for materials selection. Mater. Design. 37, 317–324 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. G.H. Tzeng, J–.J. Huang, Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. Hamidi, P.M. Pezeshki, A. Moradian, Weighting the criteria of brand selecting in beverage industries in Iran. Asian J. Manag. Res. 250–67 (2010)

  29. M. Dagdeviren, S. Yavuz, N. Kilinc, Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 8143–8151 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, 788010, Assam, India

    Jagadish & A. Ray

Authors
  1. Jagadish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Ray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jagadish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jagadish, Ray, A. Green Cutting Fluid Selection using Multi-attribute Decision Making Approach. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 96, 35–39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-014-0126-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-014-0126-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation