Abstract
Traditionally, crop yield has been the main focus of agricultural policies and technological interventions. For designing appropriate agricultural interventions, a holistic set of indicators accounting for the short and long-term benefits and environmental impacts as well as socioeconomic sustainability of farmers is needed. In contrast with existing frameworks for assessing farming practices where the indicators are restricted to a preset attributes, we developed a stock and flow based framework for a systemic identification of both short and long-term indicators. While stock variables inside the system capture the stability and resilience of the system, indicators identified from various dimensions of the biophysical flows across the system–environment boundary capture the desirable outcomes and undesirable impacts. Our framework also aids in selection of appropriate proxy indicators for hard to measure primary indicators by tracing their forward and backward linkages rather than avoiding them due to their complexity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrieu N, Piraux M, Tonneau J-P (2007) Design of sustainability indicators of the production systems in Brazilian semi-arid area by the analysis of biomass flows. Int J Sustain Dev 10(1–2):106–121
Astier M, Speelman EN, López-Ridaura S, Masera OR, Gonzalez-Esquivel CE (2011) Sustainability indicators, alternative strategies and trade-offs in peasant agroecosystems: analysing 15 case studies from Latin America. Int J Agric Sustain 9(3):409–422
Bossel H (2000) Assessing viability and sustainability : a systems-based approach for deriving comprehensive indicator sets. Conserv Ecol 5(2):12
Dale VH, Beyeler SC (2001) Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators. Ecol Indic 1:3–10
European Commission (2001) A framework for indicators for the economic and social dimensions of sustainable agriculture and rural development. Agriculture Directorate-General, Brussels
European Commission (2006) Development of agri-environmental indicators for monitoring the integration of environmental concerns into the common agricultural policy: COM (2006) 508 final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52006DC0508&from=EN. Accessed 07 July 2016
FAO (2013) Sustainability assessment of food and agriculture systems. Guidelines version 3.0. Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome
FAO (2014) Food wastage footprint: full-cost accounting. Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations, Rome
Gallop G (2003) A systems approach to sustainability and sustainable development. Sustainable Development and Human Settlements Division, Santiago
Girardin P, Bockstaller C, Van der Werf H (1999) Indicators: tools to evaluate the environmental impacts of farming systems. J Sustain Agric 13(4):37–41
Gómez-Limón JA, Sanchez-Fernandez G (2010) Empirical evaluation of agricultural sustainability using composite indicators. Ecol Econ 69(5):1062–1075
Jahanshahloo GR, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Maddahi R, Jafari Y (2012) Efficiency and benchmarking in the presence of undesirable (bad) outputs: a DEA approach. Int J Appl Math Res 1(2):178–188
Klinglmair M, Sala S, Brandão M (2014) Assessing resource depletion in LCA: a review of methods and methodological issues. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):580–592
Kovach J, Petzoldt C, Degni J, Tette J (1992) A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides. N Y Food Life Sci Bull 139(139):1–8
Li FJ, Dong SC, Li F (2012) A system dynamics model for analyzing the eco-agriculture system with policy recommendations. Ecol Model 227:34–45
López-ridaura S, Masera O, Astier M (2002) Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems. The MESMIS framework. Ecol Indic 2:135–148
López-Ridaura S, Van Keulen H, Van Ittersum MK, Leffelaar PA (2005) Multiscale methodological framework to derive criteria and indicators for sustainability evaluation of peasant natural resource management systems. Environ Dev Sustain 7(1):51–69
Midgley G, Reynolds M (2004) Systems/operational research and sustainable development: towards a new agenda. Sustain Dev 12(2004):56–64
Mingers J, Rosenhead J (2004) Problem structuring methods in action. Eur J Oper Res 152(3):530–554
NAAS India (2011) Carrying capacity of indian agriculture (Policy Paper No. 51). National Academy of Agricultural Sciences, New Delhi
Nathan HSK, Reddy BS (2011) Criteria selection framework for sustainable development indicators. Int J Multicriteria Decis Mak 1(3):257–279
Niemeijer D, de Groot RS (2008) A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol Indic 8(1):14–25
Pannell DJ, Glenn NA (2000) A framework for the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture. Ecol Econ 33:135–149
Planning Commission of India (2002) Tenth five year plan (2002–2007)
Rigby D, Woodhouse P, Young T, Burton M (2001) Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice. Ecol Econ 39(3):463–478
Rosen R (1991) Life itself: a comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. Columbia University Press, New York
Rossing WAH, Zander P, Josien E, Groot JCJ, Meyer BC, Knierim A (2007) Integrative modelling approaches for analysis of impact of multifunctional agriculture: a review for France, Germany and The Netherlands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 120:41–57
Roy R, Chan NW (2011) An assessment of agricultural sustainability indicators in Bangladesh: review and synthesis. Environmentalist 32(1):99–110
Ruben R, Moll H, Kuyvenhoven A (1998) Integrating agricultural research and policy analysis: analytical framework and policy application for Bio-economic modelling. Agric Syst 58(3):331–349
Sharpe A (2004) Literature review of frameworks for macro-indicators. Centre for the study of Living Standards, Ontario
Shi T, Gill R (2005) Developing effective policies for the sustainable development of ecological agriculture in China: the case study of Jinshan County with a systems dynamics model. Ecol Econ 53:223–246
Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston
United Nations (2001) Indicators of sustainable development: framework and methodologies. Comm Sustain Dev 3:294
Van Cauwenbergh N, Biala K, Bielders C et al (2007) SAFE—a hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 120(2–4):229–242
von Geibler J, Liedtke C, Wallbaum H, Schaller S (2006) Accounting for the social dimension of sustainability: experiences from the biotechnology industry. Bus Strategy Environ 15(5):334–346
Von Wirén-Lehr S (2001) Sustainability in agriculture—an evaluation of principal goal-oriented concepts to close the gap between theory and practice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 84:115–129
Weidema B, Finnveden G, Stewart M (2005) Impacts from resource use—a common position paper. Int J Life Cycle Assess 10(6):382
Wiek A, Binder C (2005) Solution spaces for decision-making—a sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25(6):589–608
Wolstenholme EF (1983) System dynamics: a system methodology or a system modeling technique. Dynamica 9(2):84–90
Acknowledgements
This research is supported in parts by Research Grant No 1387/P-234/2014-15 from National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD), Mumbai, India, and Teaching fellowship from Ministry of Human Resources Development, Govt. of India. We express our sincere thanks to members of Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) and in particular our NGO partners Tribal Health Initiative, Dharmapuri, Tamilnadu; Myrada, HD Kote, Mysore, Karnataka; Chetana Vikas, Wardha, Maharashtra; and Chetna Organic, Bhawanipatna, Odisha; for various inputs and discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siva Muthuprakash, K.M., Damani, O.P. A Stock and Flow Based Framework to Identify Indicators for a Holistic Comparison of Farming Practices. Agric Res 6, 248–258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-017-0266-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-017-0266-6