Skip to main content
Log in

Posterior Analysis of Stochastic Frontier Models with Truncated Normal Errors

  • Published:
Computational Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Previous work in stochastic frontier models with exponentially distributed one-sided errors using both Gibbs sampling and Monte Carlo integration with importance sampling reveals the enormous computational gains that can be achieved using the former. This paper takes up inference in another interesting class of stochastic frontier models, those with truncated normal one-sided error terms, and shows that posterior simulation involves drawing from standard or log-concave distributions, implying that Gibbs sampling is an efficient solution to the Bayesian integration problem. The sampling behavior of the Bayesian procedure is investigated using a Monte Carlo experiment. The method is illustrated using US airline data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 2 Greene’s (1990) normal-gamma frontier model also allows for the possibility that the modal value is away from zero. For a criticism of this model see Ritter and Simar (1997). This criticism applies to the truncated normal model as well.

  2. 3 The Erlang distribution is the gamma under the assumption that the shape parameter is integer.

  3. 4 Geweke’s (1991) method (based on acceptance sampling) is generally the most efficient way to draw random numbers from truncated normal or Student-t distributions. However, I have found that inversion of the cdf is more efficient when one uses computer languages based on vector arithmetic, like “gauss”. The reason is that Geweke’s technique cannot be “vectorized”.

  4. 5 Fernandez, Osiewalski and Steel (1997) show that an informative prior for σ is needed to ensure a proper posterior distribution. See also Ritter (1993) and Ritter and Simar (1993).

  5. 6 van den Broeck et al. (1994, pp.286–287) have devised an elicitation strategy based on what they call r*, the prior median efficiency. Their joint prior for ψ and ω is the same as in this paper. According to this elicitation procedure, values of q′ near 0.1 or 0.2 that would imply 80–90% prior median efficiency are very close to what would come out as the result of their procedure, for small values of a0. Larger values of ao are not consistent with such prior median efficiency.

  6. 7 These results are available on request.

  7. 8 This can be shown using Johnson, Kotz and Balakrishnan (1994, formula 13.135) who provide the variance of a normal random variable truncated to a given interval.

References

  • Aigner, D., Knox-Lovell, C.A. and Schmidt, P., 1977, Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P.W., 1990, Recent developments in the econometric estimation of frontiers. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Broeck, J., Koop, G., Osiewalski, J. and Steel, M.F.J., 1994, Stochastic frontier models: A Bayesian perspective. Journal of Econometrics, 61, 273–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks S.P., Deilaportas, P. and Roberts, G.O., 1997, A total variation method for diagnosing convergence of MCMC algorithms. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, forthcoming.

  • Brooks, S.P. and Gelman, A., 1997, Alternative methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, forthcoming.

  • Brooks, S.P. and Roberts, G.O., 1998, Assessing convergence of Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms, manuscript, School of Mathematics, University of Bristol.

  • Fernandez, C., Osiewalski, J., and Steel, M.F.J., 1997, On the use of panel data in stochastic frontier models. Journal of Econometrics, 79, 169–193.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A.E., and Smith, A.F.M., 1990, Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 398–409.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix. Some properties of posterior conditional distributions of ω −1 and ψ}

Appendix. Some properties of posterior conditional distributions of ω −1 and ψ}

The posterior conditional distribution of ω is given by (8). A change of variables to v = ω−1 yields the following distribution for v:

$$p(v|.) \propto {v^{N - 1}}\exp \left[ { - \sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {{{\left( {v{u_i} - \psi } \right)}^2}} /2} \right]$$

Taking logarithms and denoting Q(v) = ln p(v ∣.) we have

$$dQ(v)/dv = (N - 1){v^{ - 1}} - \sum\limits_{i = 1}^N {\left( {v{u_i} - \psi } \right)} $$

Setting to zero and multiplying by v yields the quadratic equation

$$\left( {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^N {u_i^2} } \right){v^2} - \left( {\psi \sum\limits_{i = 1}^N {{u_i}} } \right)v - (N - 1) = 0$$

This quadratic has a unique positive root, which determines an optimum of the posterior conditional distribution of v. Moreover to prove that this distribution is log-concave, we consider

$${d^2}Q(v)/d{v^2} = - (N - 1){v^{ - 2}} - \sum\limits_{i = 1}^N {{u_i}} $$

which is negative for all admissible values of v.

Regarding now the posterior conditional distribution of ψ it is given by (7). Assuming that the prior is log-concave consider concavity of the logarithm of the first term in the product of (7), namely

$$G(\psi ) \equiv - N\ln {\rm{\Phi }}(\psi ) - (N/2){\left( {\psi - \bar u{\omega ^{ - 1}}} \right)^2}$$

whose second derivative is

$${d^2}G(\psi )/d{\psi ^2} = N\left( {{{\psi \phi (\psi ){\rm{\Phi }}(\psi ) + \phi {{(\psi )}^2}} \over {{\rm{\Phi }}{{(\psi )}^2}}} - 1} \right)$$

after taking into account that dϕ(ψ)/ = −ψϕ(ψ). It can be easily shown that the function in parentheses is always non-positive, which proves log-concavity of the posterior conditional distribution of ψ.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsionas, E.G. Posterior Analysis of Stochastic Frontier Models with Truncated Normal Errors. Computational Statistics 16, 559–575 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s180-001-8330-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s180-001-8330-0

Keywords

Navigation