Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
Häusliche Pflege verursacht objektiv messbaren Stress. Einflussfaktoren sind Herausforderungen des Pflegealltags, das Krankheitsbild an sich, Dauer der Erkrankung und Intensität der Pflege, Veränderung von Persönlichkeit und Verhalten der Pflegebedürftigen. Pflegende Angehörige erleben umfassende Veränderungen ihres Lebens.
Fragestellung/Ziel
Ziel der Arbeit war es, die potenziellen Stressoren pflegender Angehöriger zu beschreiben.
Methode
Das Review erfolgte anhand der Datenbanken PubMed und PsychINFO.
Ergebnisse
Der Mangel an Freizeit, Auszeiten und Urlaub sowie eingeschränkte Sozialkontakte sind besonders belastende Faktoren für pflegende Angehörige. Die anstrengende Pflegesituation wirkt sich nachteilig auf die Gesundheit aus. Vor allem Frauen sind einer Mehrfachbelastung ausgesetzt und in Gefahr auszubrennen. Sie erleben die Pflegebelastung doppelt so stark wie Männer. Berufliche Pläne müssen ad acta gelegt werden, und erhebliche finanzielle Einbußen durch Reduzierung oder Kündigung zugunsten der häuslichen Pflege verschärfen die Lebenssituation zudem. Homosexuelle Pflegende sind zusätzlicher Diskriminierung ausgesetzt.
Schlussfolgerungen
Pflegende Angehörige benötigen adäquate Vorbereitung auf die Pflegesituation, Vermittlung von Basiskenntnissen und Information über Unterstützungseinrichtungen. Sie benötigen niederschwellige Angebote und Entlastungsmaßnahmen, um nicht selbst zu „second victims“ zu werden.
Abstract
Introduction
Domiciliary care causes objectively measurable stress. Influencing factors are the challenging nature of everyday care, the clinical picture of the illness itself, the duration of the illness, the intensity of the care, plus the changes to the personality and behavior of those receiving care. Caring relatives undergo wide-ranging changes to their life.
Aim/Question
The aim of this study was to investigate the potential stressors of caregivers.
Method
This review was performed by the use of databases such as PubMed and PsychINFO.
Results
The shortage of leisure time, time out and holidays plus restrictions of social contacts are particularly distressing factors. The exhausting nature of care work can have a deleterious effect on the health of caregivers. Women in particular are prone to multiple burdens and are in danger of burn-out. They experience the pressure caused by care twice as intensely as men. Career plans have to be abandoned and considerable financial difficulties arise due to a reduction in earnings or resignation when domiciliary care commitments have to be fulfilled. Homosexual caregivers are exposed to additional discrimination.
Conclusion
Caring relatives are in need of adequate preparation for the care situation as well as the necessary knowledge and information about support facilities. They are in need of low threshold help and respite in order not to become second victims themselves.
Literatur
Agren S, Evangelista L, Strömberg, A. Do partners of patients with chronic heart failure experience caregiver burden?. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010;9(4):254–62.
Andren S, Elmstahl S. Family caregiver’s subjective experiences of satisfaction in dementia care: aspects of burden, subjective health and sense of coherence. Scand J Caring Sci. 2005;19(2):157–68.
Auer J. Living well with kidney failure–a guide to living your life to the full. London: Class Publishing; 2005.
Beach S, Schulz R, Williamson G, et al. Risk factors for potentially harmful informal caregiver behavior. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(2):255–61.
Benyamini Y, Lomranz J. The relationship between activity restriction and replacement with depressive symptoms among older adults. Psychol Aging. 2004;19(2):362–6.
Bevans M, Sternberg E. Caregiving burden, stress, and health effects among family caregivers of adult cancer patients. JAMA. 2012;307(4):398–403.
Bialon L, Coke S. A study on caregiver burden: stressors, challenges, and possible solutions. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012;29(3):210–8.
Collins L, Swartz K. Caregiver Care. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83(11):1309–17.
Del-Pino-Casado R, Frías-Osuna A, Martínez-Riera J. Gender differences regarding informal caregivers of older people. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012; 44(4):349–57.
Dinesen B, Nohr C, Anderson S, et al. Under surveillance, yet looked after: telehomecare as viewed by patients and their spouse/partners. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008;7(3):239–46.
Hash K. Caregiving and post-caregiving experiences of midlife and older gay men and lesbians. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2006;47(3–4):121–38.
Kelly M. Who cares for the Carers? J Ren Care. 2010;36(1):16–20.
Kinney J, Stephens M, Franks M, et al. Stress and satisfactions of family caregivers to older stroke patients. J Appl Gerontol. 1995;14(1):3–21.
Lüdecke D, Mnich E, Kofahl C. The impact of sociodemographic factors on the utilisation of support services for family caregivers of elderly dependents–results from the German sample of the EUROFAMCARE study. GMS Psychosoc Med. 2012;9:1–11.
McCullagh E, Brigstocke G, Donaldson N, et al. Determinants of caregiving burden and quality of life in caregivers of stroke patients. Stroke. 2005;36(10):2181–6.
Mooney A, Statham J, Simon A. The pivot generation. Informal care and work after fifty. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2002.
National Alliance for Caregiving-Caregiving in the U.S.: executive summary. http://www.caregiving.org/data/CaregivingUSAllAgesExecSum.pdf (2009). Zugegriffen: 3. March. 2013.
Neri A. Relationship between gender, age, family conditions, physical and mental health, and social isolation of elderly caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(3):472–83.
Nieboer A, Schulz R, Matthews K, et al. Spousal caregivers’ activity restriction and depression: a model for changes over time. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47(9):1361–71.
Nolan M, Lundh U, Grant G, et al. Partnerships in family care: understanding the caregiving career. Philadelphia: Open University Press; 2003.
Perrig-Chiello P, Höpflinger F. Ageing parents and their middle-aged children – demographic and psychosocial challenges. Eur J Ageing. 2005;2(4):183–91.
Perrig-Chiello P, Hutchison S. Family caregivers of elderly persons. a differential perspective on stressors, resources and well-being. Gero Psych. 2010;23(4):195–206.
Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2003;18(2):250–67.
Pochobradsky E, Bergmann F, Brix-Samoylenko H, et al. Situation pflegender Angehöriger. Endbericht. Österreichisches Bundesinstitut für Gesundheitswesen (ÖBIG). http://www.unigraz.at/ukidabww_bmask_studie_situation_pflegender_angehoeriger.pdf (2005). Zugegriffen: 3. March. 2013.
Pressler S, Gradus-Pizlo I, Chubinski S, et al. Family caregiver outcomes in heart failure. Am J Crit Care. 2009;18(2):149–59.
Schulz R, O’Brien A, Bookwala J, et al. Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: prevalence, correlates, and causes. Gerontologist. 1995;35(6):771–91.
Schulz R, Sherwood P. Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. Am J Nurs. 2008;108(9):23–7.
Smith G, Williamson G, Miller L, et al. Depression and quality of informal care: a longitudinal investigation of caregiving stressors. Psychol Aging. 2011;26(3):584–91.
Stapleton S (2003): Powerlessness in persons with end stage renal disease. In: Miller J. (ed.). Coping with Chronic Illness–Overcoming Powerlessness. 3. Aufl. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company
Vitiliano P, Zhang J, Scanlan J. Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2003;129(6):946–72.
Wettstein A, König M, Schmid R. et al. Belastung und Wohlbefinden bei Angehörigen von Menschen mit Demenz. Eine Interventionsstudie. NFP 45, „Sozialstaat“. Ein Programm des schweizerischen Nationalstaats. Bern: Rügger; 2005.
Williamson G, Shaffer D. The activity restriction model of depressed affect: Antecedents and consequences of restricted normal activities. In: Williamson G, Shaffer D, Parmalee P, editors. Physical Illness and depression in older adults: A handbook of theory research, and practice. New York: Plenum; 2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
Es besteht kein Interessenkonflikt. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Posch-Eliskases, U., Rungg, C., Moosbrugger, M. et al. Stress bei pflegenden Angehörigen. HBScience 6, 27–32 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s16024-014-0234-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s16024-014-0234-z