Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of hydrogeomorphic processes on ecological functions of brown trout habits

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 04 September 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

In recent decades, due to river regulations and their impact on river morphology, brown trout populations have been declining along Lar River downstream of Lar Dam located near Tehran, Iran. Considering the recent water scarcity in the country, development of river habitat assessment models seems necessary. Therefore, in this research, an analytically applied approach is adopted to evaluate brown trout habitat by creating a relation among the hydrologic, hydraulic, geomorphic and ecologic processes. After field survey, dimensionless shear stress of the stream flow thresholds including environmental flow, bankfull flow, surface and subsurface sediment flow thresholds was calculated for Lar, Dalichay and Sefidab Rivers using Shields formula. Then, by considering the dimensionless shear stress ranges of the stream flow thresholds, functional flows ranges and duration were calculated together with ecological efficiency of the cross sections. In addition, effects of annual water yield and entrenchment ratio of the cross sections on habitat functionality were also worked out as a result of which an exponential interaction was developed between the dimensionless shear stress and discharge. Results show that an increase in functional flows ranges and duration, together with rising of ecological efficiency, is directly proportional to an increase in median bed sediment size, entrenchment ratio and annual water yield. Therefore, flow regime, cross-sectional geometry, water-surface slope and bed sediment size could be effective on the ecological functions of the brown trout’s life cycle and functionality of river flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 04 September 2017

    An erratum to this article has been published.

References

  • Armstrong JD, Kemp P, Kennedy G, Ladle M, Milner N (2003) Habitat requirements of Atlantic salmon and brown trout in rivers and streams. Fish Res 62:143–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beechie TJ, Sear DA, Olden JD, Pess GR, Buffington JM, Moir H, Roni P, Pollock MM (2010) Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. Bioscience 60:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beland KF, Jordan RM, Meister AL (1982) Water depth and velocity preferences of spawning Atlantic salmon in Maine rivers. North Am J Fish Manag 2:11–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjornn TC, Reiser DW (1991) Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. In influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats. Am Fish Soc Spec Publ 19:83–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovee KD, Lamb BL, Bartholow JM, Stalnaker CB, Taylor J (1998) Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology (no. USGS/BRD/ITR–1998-0004). Geological Survey Reston Va Biologicalresources Div

  • Brierley GJ, Fryirs KA (2005) Geomorphology and river management: applications of the river styles framework. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, p 398

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunte K, Abt SR (2001) Sampling surface and subsurface particle-size distributions in wadable gravel- and cobble-bed streams for analyses in sediment transport, hydraulics, and stream-bed monitoring. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Gen. technical report. RMRS-GTR-74, 428 p

  • Caissie D (2006) The thermal regime of rivers: a review. Freshw Biol 51:1389–1406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calow P, Petts GE (eds) (1994) The rivers handbook. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke SJ, Bruce-Burgess L, Wharton G (2003) Linking form and function: toward an eco-hydromorphic approach to sustainable river restoration. Aquat Conserv-Mar Freshw Ecosyst 13:439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauwalter DC, Splinter DK, Fisher WL, Marston RA (2007) Geomorphology and stream habitat relationships with smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) abundance at multiple spatial scales in eastern Oklahoma. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64(8):1116–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NM, Norris RH, Thoms MC (2000) Prediction and assessment of local stream habitat features using large-scale catchment characteristics. Freshw Biol 45:343–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole-Olivier MJ, Marmonier P, Beffy JL (1997) Response of invertebrates to lotic disturbance: is the hyporheic zone a patchy refugium? Freshw Biol 37:257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emami A (2010) Sediment transport. Publication of JIHAD AMIRKABIR University, ISBN: 978 -964 - 6096-33-2 (in Persian)

  • Escobar-Arias MI, Pasternack GB (2010) A hydrogeomorphic dynamics approach to assess in-stream ecological functionality using the functional flows model, part 1—model characteristics. River Res Appl 26:1103–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández D, Barquín J, Raven P (2011) A review of river habitat characterisation methods: indices vs. characterisation protocols. Limnetica 30(2):217–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkard AM, Gascoigne JC (2009) Hydrodynamics of discontinuous mussel beds: laboratory flume simulations. J Sea Res 62(4):250–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frothingham KM, Rhoads BL, Herricks EE (2002) A Multiscale conceptual framework for integrated ecogeomorphological research to support stream naturalization in the agricultural midwest. Environ Manag 29(1):16–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Vogel RM, Kroll CN, Poff NL, Olden JD (2009) Development of representative indicators of hydrologic alteration. J Hydrol 374(1):136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gippel CJ, Stewardson MJ (1998) Use of wetted perimeter in defining minimum environmental flows. River Res Appl 14:53–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon ND, McMahon TA, Finlayson BL (2004) Stream hydrology: an introduction for ecologists, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Guay JC, Boisclair D, Rioux D, Leclerc M, Lapointe M, Legendre P (2000) Development and validation of numerical habitat models for juveniles of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57(10):2065–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson FM (1969) Open channel flow, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard KWF, Maier HS, Mattson SL (2006) Ground-surface water interactions and the role of the hyporheic zone. Groundw Ecosyst. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4738-x_10

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR (1991) Biological Integrity: a long-neglected aspect of water resource management. Ecol Appl 1(1):66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemetsen A, Amundsen PA, Dempson JB, Jonsson B, Jonsson N, O’connell MF, Mortensen E (2003) Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L., brown trout Salmo trutta L. and Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (L.): a review of aspects of their life histories. Ecol Freshw Fish 12:1–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach JM, Kornelsen KC, Samuel J, Coulibaly P (2015) Hydrometric network design using streamflow signatures and indicators of hydrologic alteration. J Hydrol 529(3):1350–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold LB, Wolman MG, Miller JP (1964) Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Freeman and Co., San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnansaari T, Alfredsen K, Stickler M, Arnekleiv JV, Harby A, Cunjak RA (2009) Does ice matter? Site fidelity and movements by Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr during winter in a substrate enhanced river reach. River Res Appl 25:773–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnansaari T, Keskinen A, Romakkaniemi A, Erkinaro J, Orell P (2010) Deep habitats are important for juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. in large rivers. Ecol Freshw Fish 19:618–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddock I (1999) The importance of physical habitat assessment for evaluating river health. Freshw Biol 41:373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Beamer EM, Pess GR, Quinn TP (1999) Channel type and salmonid spawning distribution and abundance. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousavi Nadushan R, Ramezan M (2011) Bioassessment of Kordan Stream (Iran) water quality using macro-zoobenthos indices. Int J Biol 3:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugodo J, Kennard M, Liston P, Nichols S, Linke S, Norris RH, Lintermans M (2006) Local stream habitat variables predicted from catchment scale characteristics are useful for predicting fish distribution. Hydrobiologia 572(1):59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikora V (2010) Hydrodynamics of aquatic ecosystems: an interface between ecology, biomechanics and environmental fluid mechanics. River Res Appl 26(4):367–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G (2008) Transport of gravel and sediment mixtures. Sediment Eng 110:165–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker G, Toro-Escobar CM, Ramey M, Beck S (2003) Effect of floodwater extraction on mountain stream morphology. J Hydraul Eng 129:885–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasternack GB, Wang CL, Merz JE (2004) Application of a 2D hydrodynamic model to design of reach-scale spawning gravel replenishment on the Mokelumne River, California. River Res Appl 20(2):205–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock C (2003) Rivers, floodplains and wetlands: connectivity and dynamics, RSPB

  • Piazza BP, La Peyre MK (2007) Restoration of the annual flood pulse in Breton Sound, Louisiana, USA: habitat change and nekton community response. Aquat Biol 1:109–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime. Bioscience 47:769–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni CF, Doisy KE, Galat DL (2002) Testing the biological basis of a stream habitat classification using benthic invertebrates. Ecol Appl 122:782–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP (1996) A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol 10(4):1163–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaldi M, Surian N, Comoti F, Bussettini M (2013) A method for the assessment and analysis of the hydromorphological condition of Italian streams: the morphological quality index (MQI). J Geomorphol 180–181:96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosgen DL (1994) A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaeri Karimi S, Yasi M, Eslamian S (2012) Use of hydrological methods for assessment of environmental flow in a river reach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9:549–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shields A (1936) Application of similarity principles, and turbulence research to bed-load movement. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena

    Google Scholar 

  • Shokoohi A, Amini M (2014) Introducing a new method to determine rivers’ ecological water requirement in comparison with hydrological and hydraulic methods. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11:747–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanford J, Ward JV (1988) The hyporheic habitat of river ecosystems. Nature 335:64–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr RR (2009) Stream assessment protocol. US Fish & Wildlife Service, Anne Arundel County, Maryland

  • Stevens LE, Schmidt JC, Ayers TJ, Brown BT (1995) Flow regulation, geomorphology, and Colorado River marsh development in the Grand Canyon, Arizona. Ecol Appl 5:1025–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson FJ, Johnson SL, Gregory SV, Acker SA (1998) Flood disturbance in a forested mountain landscape: interactions of land use and floods. Bioscience 48:681–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahershamsi A, Tabatabai MM, Shirkhani R (2012) An evaluation model of artificial neural network to predict stable width in gravel bed rivers. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9:333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tehran Regional Water Authority (2012) Gozaldare dam project. Department of Energy, report number: 127454-15003 (in Persian)

  • Thomson JR, Taylor MP, Fryirs KA, Brierly GJ (2001) A geomorphological framework for river characterization and habitat assessment. Aquat Convers Mar Freshwa Ecosyst 11:373–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonina D, Buffington JM (2009) Hyporheic exchange in mountain rivers: mechanics and environmental effects. Geogr Compass 3:1063–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valett HM, Fisher SG, Grimm NB, Camill P (1994) Vertical hydrologic exchange and ecological stability of a desert stream ecosystem. Ecology 75:548–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P et al (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467(7315):555–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosoghi GH, Mostajir B (1998) Freshwater fish 1st. edn. Tehran University Publication, Iran, pp 131–138 (in Persian)

  • Wheaton JM, Pasternack GB, Merz JE (2004) Spawning habitat rehabilitation -I. Conceptual approach and methods. Int J River Basin Manag 2(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman MG (1954) A method of sampling coarse river-bed material. Trans Am Geophys Union 35:951–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman MG (1955) The natural channel of Brandywine Creek, Pennsylvania. U. S. Geological Survey professional paper 271, Washington, D. C

  • Wolman MG, Miller JP (1960) Magnitude and frequency of forces in geomorphic processes. J Geol 68:54–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondzell SM (2006) Effect of morphology and discharge on hyporheic exchange flows in two small streams in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon. USA. Hydrol. Process 20:267–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondzell SM (2011) The role of the hyporheic zone across stream networks. Hydrol Process 25:3525–3532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wondzell SM, Swanson FJ (1999) Floods, channel change, and the hyporheic zone. Water Resour Res 35:555–567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yalin MS (1972) Mechanics of sediment transport. Pergamon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang CT (1996) Sediment transport: theory and practice. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarnell SM, Petts GE, Schmidt JC, Whipple AA, Beller EE, Dahm CN, Goodwin P, Viers JH (2015) Functional flows in modified riverscapes: hydrographs, habitats and opportunities. Bioscience 65:963–972

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Tehran Regional Water Authority and Iran Water Resources Management Company for making data accessible throughout the course of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. R. Majdzadeh Tabatabai.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: T. Yigitcanlar.

The original version of this article was revised: The title in the original version contained errors.

An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1496-7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Majdzadeh Tabatabai, M.R., Mousavi Nadushan, R. & Hashemi, S. Impact of hydrogeomorphic processes on ecological functions of brown trout habits. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 14, 1757–1770 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1281-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1281-7

Keywords

Navigation