Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A deliberation on recent legal cases and judgments of the International Court of Justice on environmental disputes

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Both national and international judgments and judicial precedents play an important role in the development of legal regimes. In the light of judgments and judicial precedents, the administration of justice and judicial security can be measured in every legal system. In this context, the International Court of Justice and other international judicial and arbitral bodies have an important role to play in the development of international law, particularly in international environmental law. In addition, judgments and judicial precedents of international courts, especially the International Court of Justice can affirm new legal rules and principles that can contribute to the development of international environmental law. This research through content analysis attempts to analyze the capacity and capability of new international judgments and judicial precedents of the International Court of Justice on environmental issues in influencing the development of environmental law. For this purpose, this study attempts to analyze five recent legal cases of the International Court of Justice. It also provides guidelines for applicable solutions by identifying legal gaps and existing inefficiencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerial Herbicide Spraying (2008) Application instituting proceedings (Ecuador v. Colombia). Int Court Justice Plead 10. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Aerial Herbicide Spraying (2013) Summary of the order of 13 September (Ecuador v. Colombia). Int Court Justice, General list No. 138. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Agreement Over the Bordet Protected Areas Between Nicaragua and Costa Rica (1990) International System of Protected Areas for Peace [SI-A-PAZ] Agreement. https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • American Treaty on Pacific Settlement of Disputes (1948) Pact of Bogotá. Signed at Bogotá. https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Avgerinopoulou D (2003) The role of the international judiciary in the settlement of environmental disputes and alternative proposals for strengthening international environmental adjudication. Prepared for global environmental governance, the Post-Johannesburg Agenda, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy New Haven, CT:12. https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Central American Institute for Studies in Toxic Substances (2009) Technical reports series 6: imports of pesticides in Costa Rica, period 1977–2006. 11. https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (2010) Application instituting proceedings filed in the Registry of the Court (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua). http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (2013) Request presented by Costa Rica and Nicaragua for the indication of provisional measures (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua). Int Court Justice 1–6. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (2013) Summary of the Order of 22 November (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua). Advis Opin Order Int Court Justice 1–3. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Charter of the Organization of American States (1948) Signed in Bogotá. www.oas.org

  • Charter of the United Nations (1945) San Francisco. www.un.org/en/documents/charter

  • Construction of a Road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (2011) Application instituting proceedings (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica). 1–127. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Construction of a Road in Costa Rica Along the San Juan River (2013) Summary of the Order of 13 December (Nicaragua v. Costa Rica). Advis Opin Order Int Court Justice 1–3. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage (1972) Adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO. https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Convention for the Conservation of the Biodiversity and Protection of the Main Wild Life Sites in Central America (1992). https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) Rio de Janeiro. https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (1973) Washington. https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat (1971) Ramsar, as amended by the Paris Protocol of December 1982 and Regina Amendments 28 May 1987. https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Declaration of Intervention of New Zealand (2013) Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand Intervening). Int Court Justice. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Declaration of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992). https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Declaration of the United Nations Conference on Human Environment (1972). https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights, Costa Rica v. Nicaragua (2009) I.C.J. Reports: 213. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Eighth report of the International Whaling Commission (1957) London. http://www.iwcoffice.org/index.php?ciD=1882&cType=document

  • Esposito R (2010) The ICJ and the future of transboundary harm disputes: a preliminary analysis of the case concerning aerial herbicide spraying (Ecuador v. Colombia). Pace Int Law Rev Online Companion 2(1):7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros Project, Hungary vs. Slovakia (1997) I. C. J. reports: 41. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Gross L (1972) Review of the role of the International Court of Justice. Am J Int Law 66:479–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (1946). https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • IWC Resolution (1985) First resolution on special permits

  • IWC Resolution (1986) Second resolution on special permits for scientific research. Both adopted by consensus. http://www.iwcoffice.org/resolutions

  • Japanese Whale Research Program, JARPA/JARPAII (2013) Scientific contribution. The Institute of Cetacean Research: Toyomi-cho 4-5: Chuo-ku: Tokyo 104-0055. http://www.icrwhale.org

  • Lee MK (2006) The Uruguay paper pulp mills dispute: Highlighting the growing importance of NGOs and public protest in enforcement of international environmental law. Sustain Dev Law Policy J 7(1, 24):71–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons (1996) Advisory opinion of 8 July 1996. I. C. J. reports 1996: 241–242. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Merkouris P (2010) Case concerning pulp mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay). University of Groningen Of environmental impact assessments and phantom experts, The Hague Justice Portal: 10. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2378882

  • Plan Colombia (2008) United States Government Accountability Office (GAO), GAO-09-71: counternarcotics aid to Colombia. www.gao.gov/new.items/d0971

  • Plator Z (1994) A theory and short history of environmental law. Loyola Los Angel Law Rev 27:1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay, Argentina v. Uruguay (2006a) Application instituting proceedings: 9. www.icj-cij.org

  • Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay, Argentina v. Uruguay (2006b) Indication of provisional measures. Order of 13 July 2006: 87. www.icj-cij.org

  • Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay, Argentina v. Uruguay (2010) Summary of the Judgments: 25–47. www.icj-cij.org

  • Reports of International Arbitral Awards (2007) First award under the Convention between Costa Rica and Nicaragua of 8 April 1896 for the demarcation of the boundary between the two Republics. United Nations, XXVIII:215–222

  • Resolution of the Permanent Council of the Organization of American States (2010) CP/RES.978 (1777/10). Situation in the border area between Costa Rica and Nicaragua

  • Rules of the International Court of Justice (1978). https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Salmenkari T (2007) Direct democracy in an environmental movement: Argentine Asambleas in the Uruguay River pulp mill controversy. El Norte Finn J Lat Am Stud 2:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands P (2003) Principles of international environmental law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 55

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sands P (2008) Litigating environmental disputes: Courts, Tribunals and the progressive development of international environmental law. Glob Forum Int Invest (OECD) 6. www.oecd.org/investment/gfi-7

  • Statute of the International Court of Justice (1945). https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Statute of the River Uruguay (1975) United Nations treaty series (UNTS). 1295(I-21425):340–347. https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Stephans T (2009) International courts and environmental protection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 187–190

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thirlway H (2010) The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice. Oxf J Br Yearb Int Law 81(1):13–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viñuales J (2008) The contribution of the International Court of Justice to the development of international environmental law: a contemporary assessment. 32 Fordham Int’L L J 232:23. https://treaties.un.org/home.aspx

  • Waldock CHM (1948) Forum prorogatum or acceptance of a unilateral summons to appear before the international court. Int Law Q 2:377–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins C (2012) Whaling in the Antarctic: case analysis and suggestions for the future of Antarctic Whaling and stock management. New York Int Law Rev 25:1–4. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2035631

  • Whaling in the Antarctic (2010) Application instituting proceedings (Australia v. Japan). Filed in the Registry of the Court. http://www.icj-cij.org

  • Whaling in the Antarctic, Australia v. Japan: New Zealand Intervening (2014) International Court of justice summary of the judgment. 51–246. http://www.icj-cij.org

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Dr. Farhad Dabiri (Islamic azad University) for his valuable remarks and suggestions, which have contributed to this paper significantly.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Poorhashemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zarei, S., Poorhashemi, S.A. & Pournouri, M. A deliberation on recent legal cases and judgments of the International Court of Justice on environmental disputes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 3391–3404 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0825-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0825-y

Keywords

Navigation