Abstract
The importance of mitigation of climate change due to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from various developmental and infrastructure projects has generated interest at global level to reduce environmental impacts. Life cycle assessment may be used as a tool to assess GHG emissions and subsequent environmental impacts resulting from electricity generation from thermal power plants. This study uses life cycle approach for assessing GHG emissions and their impacts due to natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) and imported coal thermal power plants using the IPCC 2001 and Eco-Indicator 99(H) methods in India for the first time. The total GHG emission from the NGCC thermal power plant was 584 g CO2 eq/kWh electricity generation, whereas in case of imported coal, it was 1,127 g CO2 eq/kWh electricity generation. This shows that imported coal has nearly ~2 times more impacts when compared to natural gas in terms of global warming potential and human health as disability-adjusted life years from climate change due to GHG emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O).
References
Ataei A, Iranmanesh A, Rashidi Z (2012) Life cycle assessment of advanced zero emission combined cycle power plants. Int J Environ Res 6(3):801–814
CEA (2008) Performance Review of Thermal Power Stations 2006–2007. Government of India, Ministry of Power, Central electricity Authority, Report No: CEA/GO&D/OPM/31st Issue
CEA (2012) Installed generation capacity in India. Central Electricity Authority, Ministry of Power, Government of India. [Cited 2012 March 05]. <http://www.cea.nic.in/installed_capacity.html>
Chakraborty N, Mukherjee I, Santra AK, Chowdhury S, Chakraborty S, Bhattacharya S, Mitra AP, Sharma C (2008) Measurement of CO2 CO., SO2, and NO emissions from coal-based thermal power plants in India. Atmos Environ 42:1073–1082
Falcke TJ, Hoadley AFA, Brennan DJ, Sinclair SE (2011) The sustainability of clean coal technology: IGCC with/without CCS. Process Saf Environ Prot 89:41–52
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Dones R, Hischier R, Hellweg S, Humbert S, Margni M, Nemecek T, Spielmann M (2007) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods: data v2.0. ecoinvent report No. 3, Swiss centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland
Hondo H (2005) Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case. Energy 30:2042–2056
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2011) Energy poverty: the missing Millennium Development Goal? [Cited 2012 March 05]. <http://www.iea.org/index_info.asp?id=1847>
IPCC (2000) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. [Cited 2013 July 28] < http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gp/english/>
ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. [Cited 2012 May 05]. <http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm>
ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. [Cited 2012 May 05]. <http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm>
Jaramillo P, Griffin WM, Matthews HS (2007) Comparative life cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation. Environ Sci Technol 41(17):6290–6296
Koornneef J, Keulen TV, Faaij A, Turkenburg W (2008) Life cycle assessment of a pulverized coal power plant with post-combustion capture, transport and storage of CO2. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2(4):448–467
Mahapatra D, Shukla P, Dhar S (2012) External cost of coal based electricity generation: a tale of Ahmedabad city. Energy Policy 49:253–265
Maizlish N, Woodcock J, Co S, Ostro B, Fanai A, Fairley D (2013) Health cobenefits and transportation-related reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the San Francisco bay area. Am J Pub Health 103(4):703–709
Odeh NA, Cockerill TT (2008) Life cycle analysis of UK coal fired power plants. Energy Convers Manag 49:212–220
Phumpradab K, Gheewala SH, Sagisaka M (2009) Life cycle assessment of natural gas power plant in Thailand. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:354–363
Rosenbaum RK, Bachmann TM, Gold LS et al (2008) USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:532–546
Santoyo-Castelazo E, Gujba H, Azapagic A (2011) Life cycle assessment of electricity generation in Mexico. Energy 36:1488–1499
Sathaye J, Phadke A (2006) Cost of electric power sector carbon mitigation in India: international implications. Energy Policy 34(13):1619–1629
Singh B, Strømman AH, Hertwich EG (2011) Comparative life cycle environmental assessment of CCS technologies. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5:911–921
Spath PL, Mann MK (2000) Life cycle assessment of a natural gas combined cycle power generation system. NREL, NREL/TP-570-27715
Van Zelm R, Huijbregts MAJ, Den Hollander HA, Van Jaarsveld HA, Sauter FJ, Struijs J, Van Wijnen HJ, Van de Meent D (2008) European characterization factors for human health damage of PM10 and ozone in life cycle impact assessment. Atmos Environ 42(3):441–453
Walvekar PP, Gurjar BR (2013) Formulation, application and evaluation of a stack emission model for coal-based power stations. Int J Environ Sci Technol 10(6):1235–1244
Weisser D (2007) A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies. Energy 32:1543–1559
West J (2013) The effect of quality differentials on integration of the seaborne thermal coal market. Int J Bus Finance Res 7(1):101–120
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Department of Natural Resources, TERI University for his editorial assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agrawal, K.K., Jain, S., Jain, A.K. et al. Assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from coal and natural gas thermal power plants using life cycle approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 11, 1157–1164 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0420-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0420-z