Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Inorganic arsenic sorption by drinking-water treatment residual-amended sandy soil: effect of soil solution chemistry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies in our laboratory have demonstrated that drinking-water treatment residuals are effective sorbents of arsenic V. However, the effect of soil solution chemistry on arsenic V sorption by drinking-water treatment residuals-amended soils remains to be explored. The current study uses a batch incubation experimental set up to evaluate the effect of soil solution pH, competing ligands, and complexing metal on arsenic V sorption by a sandy soil (Immokalee series) amended with two rates (25 and 50 g kg−1) of aluminum and iron-based drinking-water treatment residuals. Experiments were conducted at three initial arsenic loads (125, 1,875, 3,750 mg kg−1) and a constant solid: solution ratio of 200 g L−1. An optimum equilibration time of 8 days, obtained from kinetic studies, was utilized for sorption experiments with both aluminum and iron drinking-water treatment residual-amended soil. Presence of phosphate decreased arsenic V sorption by both aluminum and iron drinking-water treatment residual amended soils, with a strong dependence on pH, drinking-water treatment residual types, drinking-water treatment residual application rates, and phosphate concentrations. Addition of sulfate had no effect on arsenic V sorption by aluminum or iron drinking-water treatment residual-amended soil. A complementing effect of calcium on arsenic V sorption was observed at higher pH. Results elucidating the effect of soil solution chemistry on the arsenic V sorption will be helpful in calibrating drinking-water treatment residual as a sorbent for remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Dor E, Banin A (1989) Determination of organic matter content in arid-zone soils using a simple “loss-on-ignition” method. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 20:1675–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott HA, Dempsey BA (1991) Agronomic effects of land application of water treatment sludges. J. AWWA 83:126–131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott HA, O’Connor GA, Brinton S (2002) Phosphorus leaching from biosolids-amended sandy soils. J Environ Qual 31:681–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goh K, Lim T (2004) Geochemistry of inorganic arsenic and selenium in a tropical soil: effect of reaction time, pH and competitive anions on arsenic and selenium adsorption. Chemosphere 55:849–859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S (2002) Competitive adsorption of arsenate and arsenite on oxides and clay minerals. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:413–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon EA, Gonzalez JS, Bartos JM (1997a) Soil pH (1:2v/v). IFAS extension soil testing laboratory (ESTL) and analytical research laboratory (ARL) chemical procedures and training manual. Fl. Coop. Ext. Ser. Cir. 812, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 15

  • Hanlon EA, Gonzalez JS, Bartos JM (1997b) Electrical conductivity. IFAS extension soil testing laboratory (ESTL) and analytical research laboratory (ARL) chemical procedures and training manual. Fl. Coop. Ext. Ser. Cir. 812, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 24

  • Jain A, Loeppert RH (2000) Effect of competing anions on the adsorption of arsenate and arsenite by ferrihydrite. J Environ Qual 29:1422–1430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livesey NT, Huang PM (1981) Adsorption of Arsenate by soils and its relation to selected chemical properties and anions. Soil Sci 131:88–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loeppert RH, Inskeep WP (1996) Iron. In: Method of soil analysis. Part 3: chemical methods. SSSA Book Series, pp 639–664

  • Makris KC, Harris WG, O’Connor GA, Obreza TA (2004) Phosphorus immobilization in micropores of drinking-water treatment residuals: implications for long-term stability. Environ Sci Technol 38:6590–6596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makris KC, Harris WG, O’Connor GA, Obreza TA, Elliott HA (2005) Physicochemical properties related to long-term phosphorus retention by drinking water treatment residuals. Environ Sci Technol 39:4280–4289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makris KC, Sarkar D, Datta R (2006) Evaluating a drinking-water waste by-product as a novel sorbent for arsenic. Chemosphere 64:730–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Makris KC, Sarkar D, Parsons JG, Datta R, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2007) Surface arsenic speciation of a drinking-water treatment residual using X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci 311:544–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manful GA, Verloo M, Spiegeleer FG (1989) Arsenate sorption by soils in relation to pH and selected anions. Pedologie 39:55–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manning BA, Goldberg S (1996) Modeling competitive adsorption of arsenate with phosphate and molybdate on oxide minerals. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:121–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagar R, Sarkar D, Makris KC, Datta R, Sylvia VL (2009) Bioavailability and bioaccessibility of arsenic in soil amended with drinking-water treatment residuals. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 59:755–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagar R, Sarkar D, Makris KC, Datta R (2010) Effect of solution chemistry on arsenic sorption by Al- and Fe-based drinking-water treatment residuals. Chemosphere 78:1028–1035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly SE, Strawn DG, Sparks DL (2001) Residence time effects on arsenate adsorption/desorption mechanisms on goethite. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven KP, Jain A, Loeppert RH (1998) Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: kinetics, equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes. Environ Sci Technol 32:344–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sall J, Creighton L, Lehman A (2005) JMP start statistics, 3rd edn. SAS Institute, 631 Cary, NC

  • Sarkar D, Makris KC, Vandanapu V, Datta R (2007) Arsenic immobilization in soils amended with drinking-water treatment residuals. Environ Pollut 146:414–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks DL (1999) Kinetics and mechanism of chemical reactions at the soil mineral/water interface. In: Soil physical chemistry. 2nd edn. CEC Press, Boca Raton, pp 135–191

  • Williams LE, Barnett MO, Kramer TA, Melville JG (2003) Adsorption and transport of arsenic(V) in experimental subsurface systems. J Environ Qual 32:841–850

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Zhao YQ, Babatunde AO, Wang L, Ren YX, Han Y (2006) Characteristics and mechanisms of phosphate adsorption on dewatered alum sludge. Separ Purif Technol 51:193–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge NIH-SCORE, SALSI, and USEPA-STAR programs for funding this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Datta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagar, R., Sarkar, D., Makris, K.C. et al. Inorganic arsenic sorption by drinking-water treatment residual-amended sandy soil: effect of soil solution chemistry. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10, 1–10 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0106-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0106-y

Keywords

Navigation