Skip to main content
Log in

Application of response surface methodology for weld strength prediction in laser welding of polypropylene/clay nanocomposite

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Polymer Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Welding as a fabrication process can be used to join materials, including composite and nanocomposites and laser welding process due to its advantages has found wide applications in this field. Its process parameters can play a significant role in determining the weld strength of laser-welded joints in polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. In this study, the effect of laser welding parameters, such as laser power, welding speed and focal position along with the clay content in a polypropylene/clay nanocomposite on weld strength were determined using response surface methodology. This methodology was applied for developing a mathematical model which can predict the main effects of the above parameters and their impacts on tensile strength of butt-welded laser joints in 2-mm thick polypropylene/clay nanocomposite sheets. The analysis of variance was performed to check the adequacy of the developed model. A comparison was also made between the predicted and actual results. The results showed that weld strength decreased when clay content was increased from 0 to 6 %, but welding speed increased from 30 to 60 mm/s. The above parameters were also optimized to achieve a high strength welded joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nogueira T, Botan R, Wypych F, Lona L (2011) Study of thermal and mechanical properties of PMMA/LDHs nanocomposites obtained by in situ bulk polymerization. Compos Part A-Appl Sci Manuf 42:1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. García-Lópeza D, Gobernado-Mitre I, Fernández JF, Merinoa JC, Pastora JM (2005) Influence of clay modification process in PA6-layered silicate nanocomposite properties. Polymer 46:2758–2765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rangari VK, Shaik MY, Mahfuz H, Jeelani S (2009) Fabrication and characterization of high strength Nylon-6/Si3N4 polymer nanocomposite fibers. Mater Sci Eng A 500:92–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourbigot S, Devaux E, Flambard X (2002) Flammability of polyamide-6/clay hybrid nanocomposite textiles. Polym Degrad Stab 75:397–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lei SG, Hoa SV, Ton-That M-T (2006) Effect of clay types on the processing and properties of polypropylene nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 66:1274–1279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Abdel-Goad M (2011) Rheological characterization of melt compounded polypropylene/clay nanocomposites. Compos Part B-Eng 42:1044–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mittal V (2010) Optimization of polymer nanocomposite properties. Polym Res, Germany, pp 93–131

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Grunlan JC, Grigorian A, Hamilton CB, Mehrabi AR (2004) Effect of clay concentration on the oxygen permeability and optical properties of a modified poly(vinyl alcohol). J Appl Polym Sci 93:1102–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bates PJ, Braybrook C, Kisway T, Tucker B, Gopakumar TG, Pagé DJYS, Wu C-Y (2004) Vibration welding polypropylene-based nanocomposites. ANTEC 1:1128–1131

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mokhtarzadeh A, Benatar A, Wu C-Y (2004) Experiments in hot plate welding of polypropylene nanocomposite. ANTEC 1:1168–1172

    Google Scholar 

  11. Casalino G, Ghorbel E (2008) Numerical model of CO2 laser welding of thermoplastic polymers. J Mater Process Technol 207:63–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Olabi AG, Casalino G, Benyounis KY, Hashmi MSJ (2006) An ANN and Taguchi algorithms integrated approach to the optimization of CO2 laser welding. Adv Eng Softw 37:643–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berretta JR, De Rossi W, Martins das Neves MD, De Almeida IA, Vieira Junior ND (2007) Pulsed Nd:YAG laser welding of AISI 304 to AISI 420 stainless steels. Opt Laser Eng 45:960–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khan MMA, Romoli L, Fiaschi M, Dini G, Sar F (2011) Experimental design approach to the process parameter optimization for laser welding of martensitic stainless steels in a constrained overlap configuration. Opt Laser Technol 43:158–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Handbook of plastics joining: a practical guide (1997) Plastic Design Library Divsion of William Andrew Inc, NY, USA

  16. Acherjee B, Misra D, Bose D, Venkadeshwaran K (2009) Prediction of weld strength and seam width for laser transmission welding of thermoplastic using response surface methodology. Opt Laser Technol 41:956–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu H, Wang K, Li P, Zhang C, Du D, Hu Y, Wang X (2012) Modeling and prediction of transmission laser bonding process between titanium coated glass and PET based on response surface methodology. Opt Laser Eng 50:440–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang X, Song X, Jiang M, Li P, Hu Y, Wang K, Liu H (2012) Modeling and optimization of laser transmission joining process between PET and 316L stainless steel using response surface methodology. Opt Laser Eng 44:656–663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dosser L, Hix K, Hartke K, Vaia R, Li M (2004) Transmission welding of carbon nanocomposites with direct-diode and Nd:YAG solid state lasers. Proceedings of SPIE 5339:465–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chávez-Valencia LE, Manzano-Ramírez A, Luna-Barcenas G, Alonso-Guzmán E (2005) Modelling of the performance of asphalt pavement using response surface methodology. Build Environ 40:1140–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Forsberg J, Nilsson L (2006) Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization. Int J Impact Eng 32:759–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee H-K, Han H-S, Son K-J, Hong S-B (2006) Optimization of Nd:YAG laser welding parameters for sealing small titanium tube ends. Mater Sci Eng A 415:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Benyounis KY, Olabi AG, Hashmi MSJ (2005) Effect of laser welding parameters on the heat input and weld-bead profile. J Mater Process Technol 164–165:978–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pan L-K, Wang CC, Hsiao YC, Ho KC (2005) Optimization of Nd:YAG laser welding onto magnesium alloy via Taguchi analysis. Opt Laser Technol 37:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumar A, Prasad B, Mishra IM (2008) Optimization of process parameters for acrylonitrile removal by a low-cost adsorbent using Box–Behnken design. J Hazard Mater 150:174–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rout SS (2008) Laser welding of biodegradable polyglycolic acid (PGA) based polymer felt scaffolds. MS thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, pp 21–25

  27. Cowpe JS, Astin JS, Pilkington RD, Hill AE, Longson M, Robinson T (2007) Application of response surface methodology to laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: influences of hardware configuration. Spectrochim Acta B 62:1335–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Montgomery DC (1984) Design and analysis of experiments, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 427–511

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Naderi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakhaei, M.R., Mostafa Arab, N.B. & Naderi, G. Application of response surface methodology for weld strength prediction in laser welding of polypropylene/clay nanocomposite. Iran Polym J 22, 351–360 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-013-0134-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-013-0134-6

Keywords

Navigation