Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Regeneration strategies influence ground bryophyte composition and diversity after forest clearcutting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Annals of Forest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

Natural regeneration with broadleaved species and reforestation with coniferous trees are two widely practiced forest regeneration strategies after timber harvesting. They lead to different tree species composition and may cause different understory biodiversity, but the effects on ground bryophyte composition and diversity are not well-known.

Aims

We tested whether natural regeneration with broadleaved species and reforestation with spruce induced different diversities of the ground bryophyte populations 20–40 years after old-growth spruce forest clearcutting in the subalpine regions of southwestern China.

Methods

Differences between natural stands and plantations were compared through the analysis of 13 paired stands, with 78 plots, 390 shrub/herb quadrats, and a total of 1,560 bryophyte quadrats.

Results

Naturally regenerated forests were characterized by lower density and cover and lower tree height but higher herbaceous plant height, shrub cover, and bryophyte diversity. They also harbored many more ground bryophytes. The species richness of pleurocarpous mosses and fans, mats, and turfs were significantly higher in naturally regenerated forests. Frequency difference analysis demonstrated that more bryophyte species preferred ground habitats in naturally regenerated forests than in plantations (116 vs. 48 species). The canonical correspondence analysis indicated that stand structure attributes were more important determinants of ground bryophyte diversity and abundance.

Conclusion

Natural regeneration and reforestation resulted in large differences in ground bryophyte populations. A larger diversity was observed in the former case, and natural regeneration practices can be an effective measure for the protection of ground bryophyte diversity after clearcutting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Astrom M, Dynesius M, Hylander K, Nilsson C (2005) Effects of slash harvest on bryophytes and vascular plants in southern boreal forest clear-cuts. Ecology 42:1194–1202

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao WK, Lei B, Pang XY, Yan XL, Jia Y (2009) Species composition and synusia structure of ground bryophyte communities under different aged spruce plantations and the old-growth forest in the upper reaches of the Dadu River, Sichuan. Biodivers Sci 17:201–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P (2008) Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. For Ecol Manage 254:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremer LL, Farley KA (2010) Does plantation forestry restore biodiversity or create green deserts? a synthesis of the effects of land-use transitions on plant species richness. Biodivers Conserv 19:3893–3915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J (2008) Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodivers Conserv 17:925–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Saunders SD, Crow T, Brosofske KD, Mroz G, Naiman R, Brookshire B, Franklin J (1999) Microclimatic in forest ecosystems and landscapes. Bioscience 49:288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • During HJ (1990) Clonal growth patterns among bryophytes. In: van Groenendael J, de Kroon H (eds) Clonal growth in plants: regulation and function. SPB Academic, The Hague, pp 153–176

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2011) State of the world’s forests 2011. Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i2000e/i2000e00.htm

  • Fenton NJ, Frego KA (2005) Bryophyte (moss and liverwort) conservation under remnant canopy in managed forests. Biol Conserv 122:417–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons M (2003) Effects of deforestation and reforestation on landscape spatial structure in boreal Saskatchewan, Canada. For Ecol Manage 174:577–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frelich LE, Machado JL, Reich PB (2003) Fine-scale environmental variation and structure of understory plant communities in two old-growth pine forests. J Ecol 91:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haeussler S, Bedford L, Leduc A, Bergeron Y, Kranabetter JM (2002) Silvicultural disturbance severity and plant communities of the southern Canadian boreal forest. Silva Fenn 36:307–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JW, Davey S, Peace AJ, Ferris R, Harding K (2002) Lichens and bryophyte communities of planted and semi-natural forests in Britain: the influence of site type, stand structure and deadwood. Biol Conserv 107:165–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD, La Roi GH (1979) Bryophyte and understory vascular plant beta diversity in relation to moisture and elevation gradients. Plant Ecol 40:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemenih M, Gidyelew T, Teketay D (2004) Effects of canopy cover and understory environment of tree plantations on richness. For Ecol Manage 194:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesica P, McCune B, Cooper SV, Hong WS (1991) Differences in lichen and bryophyte communities between old-growth and managed second-growth forests in the Swan Valley, Montana. Can J Bot 69:1745–1755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Q (2002) Ecological research on subalpine coniferous forests in China. Sichuan University Press, Chengdu

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Márialigeti S, Németh B, Tinya F, O’dor P (2009) The effects of stand structure on ground-floor bryophyte assemblages in temperate mixed forests. Biodivers Conserv 18:2223–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClellan MH, Swanston DN, Hennon PE, Deal RL, DeSanto TL, Wipfli MS (2000) Alternatives to clearcutting in the old-growth forests of southeast Alaska: study plan and establishment report. General Technical Report-Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service (PNW-GTR-494)

  • Moora M, Daniell T, Kalle H, Liira J, Püssa K, Roosaluste E, Öpik M, Wheatley R, Zobel M (2007) Spatial pattern and species richness of boreonemoral forest understorey and its determinants—a comparison of differently managed forests. For Ecol Manag 250:64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore KM (2012) Manipulation of vegetation succession in forestry and applications for sustainable forest management. Dissertation, University of Dublin

  • Nagaike T (2002) Differences in plant species diversity between conifer (Larix kaempferi) plantations and broad-leaved (Quercus crispula) secondary forests in central Japan. For Ecol Manag 168:111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newmaster SG, Bell FW (2002) The effects of silvicultural disturbances on cryptogam diversity in the boreal-mixedwood forest. Can J For Res 32:38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ódor P, Standovár T (2001) Richness of bryophyte vegetation in near-natural and managed beech stands: the effects of management-induced differences in dead wood. Ecol Bull 49:219–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Oishi Y (2009) A survey method for evaluating drought-sensitive bryophytes in fragmented forests: a bryophyte life-form based approach. Biol Conserv 142:2854–2861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2011) Vegan: community ecology package. http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/

  • Proctor MCF (2008) Physiological ecology. In: Goffinet B, Shaw AJ (eds) Bryophyte biology: 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 237–268

  • Ramovs BV, Roberts MR (2005) Response of plant functional groups within plantations and naturally regenerated forests in southern New Brunswick, Canada. Can J Forest Res 35:1261–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross-Davis AL, Frego KA (2002) Comparison of plantations and naturally regenerated clearcuts in the Acadian Forest: forest floor bryophyte community and habitat features. Can J Bot 80:21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolphi J, Gustafsson L (2011) Forests regenerating after clear-cutting function as habitat for bryophyte and lichen species of conservation concern. PLoS ONE 6:e18639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tullus T, Tullus A, Roosaluste E, Kaasik A, Lutter R, Tullus H (2013) Understorey vegetation in young naturally regenerated and planted birch (Betula spp.) stands on abandoned agricultural land. New Forest 44:591–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vellak K, Ingerpuu N (2005) Management effects on bryophytes in Estonian forests. Biodivers Conserv 14:3255–3263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu M, Qi Y, Chen J, Yin W (2000) Effects of spatial heterogeneity of microenvironment on plant biodiversity in the Southeastern Missouri Ozarks. J Geogr Inf Sci 6:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan XL, Bao WK (2008) Structure and species composition of ground bryophyte community of high-altitude young silvicultural cutovers in Ramtang County, China: effects of clear-cutting and silvicultural management. Chin J Plant Ecol 32:815–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan XL, Bao WK (2011) Ground bryophyte diversity in secondary birch forests in western Sichuan, China. Biodivers Sci 19:327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang YP (1985) Alpine forest management handbook. Sichuan Publishing House of Science & Technology, Chengdu

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by three grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (numbers 30972350, 30570333, and 31270492). We are grateful to several bryologists (Dr. Jia Yu, Prof. Xiong Yuanxing, and Prof. Wang Youfang) for assisting in some specimen identification, several graduates (Wang Cheng, You Qiuhua, Long Hai, and Yi Minbo) for their invaluable field assistance, and the three Forestry Bureaus of Jinchuan, Barkam, and Li Counties for their logistic support. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments for revising the manuscript. Finally, we appreciate the help from Lisa Delp Taylor for kindly correcting the English of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Kai Bao.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Gilbert Aussenac

Contribution of the co-authors: Designing the work: W.K.B. X.L.Y.; running the experiments: X.L.Y, W.K.B., X.Y.P., N.X.Z.; data analysis and statistics: X.L.Y., X.Y.P., article writing and revising: W.K.B., X.L.Y, J.C.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Basic site information of 13 naturally regenerated deciduous stands and 13 plantations investigated in the northwestern Sichuan, China
Table 7 Species list, their occurrence, mean cover, and important value (IV) in the naturally regenerated deciduous stands and the plantations in the northwestern Sichuan, China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yan, X.L., Bao, W.K., Pang, X.Y. et al. Regeneration strategies influence ground bryophyte composition and diversity after forest clearcutting. Annals of Forest Science 70, 845–861 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0323-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-013-0323-7

Keywords

Navigation