Skip to main content
Log in

Dispersibility and morphology of spray-dried soy powders depending on the spraying system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Dairy Science & Technology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to elucidate the factors affecting the dispersibility and morphology of soy powders. The influences of the configuration of a spraying system (CSS) on particle size and dispersibility of soy powders were investigated. The dispersibility, morphology, and particle sizes of powders produced using a wheel and those obtained using a nozzle differed. A moderate increase in particle size (from 15 to 24 μm) improved powder dispersibility in most cases. At a total protein content in the powder (w/w%)/total solids in the concentrate (w/w%) ratio of between 30/20 and 35/20, using the wheel significantly increased particle size (from 23 to 40 μm) in comparison to nozzle (from 14 to 20 μm); moreover, this increase in particle size was correlated to increase in dispersibility (r 2 = 0.90). These results are in agreement with published findings showing that a surface area that is too large (small particles) can lead to poor dispersibility of a powder in the case of both whey protein and micellar casein. In addition, the wheel provided a smaller span of particle sizes than the nozzle. The powders obtained with the wheel were therefore more homogeneous than those produced with the nozzle, making them easier to characterize in terms of functional properties. In summary, the dispersibility of soy powders depends on CSS with the wheel providing the most dispersible particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CSS:

Configuration of the spraying system

DE:

Dextrose equivalent

DI:

Dispersibility index

IA:

Interstitial air

OAT :

Occluded air

MD:

Maltodextrin

MMD:

Mobile minor dryer

SSFR:

Soy supreme fiber reduced

Span:

Variation coefficient

TP:

Total protein

TS:

Total solid

a w :

Water activity

d 0.5 :

Mass median diameter 50% of the distribution is above and 50% is below

d 0.1 :

10% of the volume distribution is below this value

d 0.9 :

90% of the volume distribution is below this value

ρ B :

Bulk density

ρ T :

Tapped density

ρ TR :

True density

References

  • Adhikari B, Howes T, Bhandari BR, Truong V (2003) Characterization of the surface stickiness of fructose–maltodextrin solutions during drying. Dry Technol 21:17–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari BR, Senoussi A, Dumoulin ED, Lebert A (1993) Spray drying of concentrated fruit juices. Dry Technol 11:1081–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carp DJ, Wagner GB, Bartholomai GB, Pilosof AMR (1997) Rheological method for kinetics of drainage and disproportionation of soy proteins foams. J Food Sci 62:1105–1109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dacanal GC, Menegalli FC (2010) Selection of operational parameters for the production of instant soy protein isolate by pulsed fluid bed agglomeration. Powder Technol 203:565–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Depreter F, Amighi K (2010) Formulation and in vitro evaluation of highly dispersive insulin dry powder. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 76:454–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Favaro-Trindade CS, Santana AS, Monterrey-Quintero ES, Trindade MA, Netto FM (2010) The use of spray drying technology to reduce bitter taste of casein hydrolysate. Food Hydrocolloids 24:336–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AS (1978) Spray drying orange juice. US Patent n° US4112130 (A)

  • Hino T, Shimabayashi S, Ohnishi N, Fujisaki M, Mori H, Watanabe O, Kawashima K, Nagao K (2000) Development of a new type nozzle and spray-drier for industrial production of fine powders. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 49:79–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imram N, Gomez I, Soh V (2003) In: Imram N (ed) The soya handbook. Tetra Pak Centre of Expertise Soya, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Kinsella JE (1987a) Surface active properties of food proteins: effects of reduction of disulfide bonds on film properties and foams stability of glycinin. J Food Sci 52:128–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Kinsella JE (1987b) Surface active properties of proteins: effects of progressive succinylation on film properties and foams stability of glycinin. J Food Sci 52:1341–1352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsella JE (1979) Functional properties of soy proteins. J Am Oil Chem Soc 56:242–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langrish TAG, Chan WC, Kota K (2007) Comparison of maltodextrin and skim milk wall deposition rates in a pilot-scale spray dryer. Powder Technol 179:84–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura A, Yoshidab R, Maedab H, Corredig M (2006) Soy soluble polysaccharide stabilization at oil–water interfaces. Food Hydrocolloids 20:277–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nazareth ZM, Deak NA, Johnson LA (2009) Functional properties of soy protein isolates prepared from gas-supported screw-pressed soybean meal. J Am Oil Chem Soc 86:315–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roos YH, Karel M (1991a) Plasticizing effect of water on thermal behaviour and crystallization of amorphous food models. J Food Sci 56:38–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roos YH, Karel M (1991b) Water and molecular weight effects on glass transitions in amorphous carbohydrates and carbohydrate solutions. J Food Sci 56:1676–1681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg M, Kopelman IJ, Talmon Y (1985) A scanning electron microscopy study of microencapsulation. J Food Sci 50:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuck P, Bouhallab S, Durupt D, Vareille P, Humbert JP, Marin M (2004) Séchage des lactosérums et dérivés: rôle du lactose et de la dynamique de l'eau. Lait 84:243–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuck P, Méjean S, Dolivet A, Jeantet R, Bhandari B (2007) Keeping quality of dairy ingredients. Lait 87:481–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuck P, Dolivet A, Jeantet R (2012) Analytical methods for food and dairy powders. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ting TY, Gonda I, Gipps EM (1992) Microparticles of polyvinyl alcohol for nasal delivery. I. Generation by spray-drying and spray-desolvation. Pharm Res 9:1330–1335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tonon RV, Baroni AF, Brabet C, Gibert O, Pallet D, Hubinger M (2009) Water sorption and glass transition temperature of spray dried. açai (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) juice. J Food Eng 94:215–221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turchiuli C, Jimenèz T, Dumoulin E (2011) Identification of thermal zones and population balance modelling of fluidized bed spray granulation. Powder Technol 208:542–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner JR, Gueguen J (1999) Surface functional properties of native, acid treated, and reduced soy glycinin. 1. Foaming properties. J Agric Food Chem 47:2173–2187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Peter Nootenboom and Patricia Heussen (Unilever) for the scanning electron micrograph images.

This research was supported by Unilever (R&D Vlaardingen, Netherlands).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Schuck.

About this article

Cite this article

Syll, O., Khalloufi, S. & Schuck, P. Dispersibility and morphology of spray-dried soy powders depending on the spraying system. Dairy Sci. & Technol. 93, 431–442 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13594-013-0112-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13594-013-0112-y

Keywords

Navigation