Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Dosimetric verification of dental stent efficacy in head and neck radiation therapy using modern radiation therapy techniques: quality of life and treatment compliance implications

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Radiation Oncology

Abstract

Objective

During radiotherapy to the head and neck, metallic dental restorations produce secondary electrons that increase dose to nearby tissue causing painful ulcers that contribute to morbidity during treatment and lead to breaks in therapy. Various protective measures have been tested with simplified phantoms and beam arrangements. Our objective was to quantitatively assess electron scatter using an anatomical phantom and modern beam configurations.

Methods

A tissue-equivalent phantom was created to simulate the oral cavity with gold crowns on opposing molars. Four-millimeter ethylene copolymer dosimetric dental stents were produced. The phantom was placed in a water bath to simulate soft tissue. Radiation was delivered in opposed lateral, nine-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) configurations. A GafChromic EBT3 film was used to simulate the mucosal surfaces of the tongue and the buccal mucosa. The film readings were then converted to isodose plots using DoseLab.

Results

With opposed beams, a 32 % reduction in maximum dose was measured in the occlusal plane with the use of stents. In the nine-field IMRT and VMAT plans, maximum dose to the adjacent film was reduced by approximately 40 % with the use of the dental stent.

Conclusions

This approximately 40 % dose reduction implies that patients’ oral mucosae adjacent to dental fixtures could receive more than 100 Gy during a course of definitive radiotherapy to the head and neck without dental stents. In this era of increasing IMRT/VMAT utilization, our results emphasize the value of stent use to improve morbidity and reduce treatment breaks for patients undergoing head and neck radiotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wingate CL, Gross W, Failla G (1962) Experimental determination of absorbed dose from X-rays near the interface of soft tissue and other material1. Radiology 79:984–1000. doi:10.1148/79.6.984

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dutreix J, Bernard M (1966) Dosimetry at interfaces for high energy X and gamma rays. Br J Radiol 39:205–210. doi:10.1259/0007-1285-39-459-205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murthy MSS, Lakshmanan AR (1976) Dose enhancement due to backscattered secondary electrons at the interface of two media. Radiat Res 67:215–223. doi:10.2307/3574410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Scrimger JW (1977) Backscatter from high atomic number materials in high energy photon beams1. Radiology 124:815–817. doi:10.1148/124.3.815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbs FA, Palos B, Goffinet DR (1976) The metal/tissue interface effect in irradiation of the oral cavity. Radiology 119:705–707. doi:10.1148/119.3.705

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thambi V, Murthy AK, Alder G, Kartha PK (1979) Dose perturbation resulting from gold fillings in patients with head and neck cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol 5:581–582. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(79)90824-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Elting LS, Cooksley CD, Chambers MS, Garden AS (2007) Risk, outcomes, and costs of radiation-induced oral mucositis among patients with head-and-neck malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:1110–1120. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.01.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elting LS, Cooksley C, Chambers M, et al. (2003) The burdens of cancer therapy. Cancer 98:1531–1539. doi:10.1002/cncr.11671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Trotti A, Bellm LA, Epstein JB, et al. (2003) Mucositis incidence, severity and associated outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: a systematic literature review. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 66:253–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bese NS, Hendry J, Jeremic B (2007) Effects of prolongation of overall treatment time due to unplanned interruptions during radiotherapy of different tumor sites and practical methods for compensation. Int J Radiat Oncol 68:654–661. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farahani M, Eichmiller FC, McLaughlin WL (1990) Measurement of absorbed doses near metal and dental material interfaces irradiated by X- and gamma-ray therapy beams. Phys Med Biol 35:369. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/35/3/006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nadrowitz R, Feyerabend T (2001) Backscatter dose from metallic materials due to obliquely incident high-energy photon beams. Med Phys 28:959–965

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Beyzadeoglu M, Dirican B, Oysul K, et al. (2006) Evaluation of scatter dose of dental titanium implants exposed to photon beams of different energies and irradiation angles in head and neck radiotherapy. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 35:14–17. doi:10.1259/dmfr/28125805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. De Conto C, Gschwind R, Martin E, Makovicka L (2014) Study of dental prostheses influence in radiation therapy. Phys Med 30:117–121. doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2013.03.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spirydovich S, Papiez L, Langer M, et al. (2006) High density dental materials and radiotherapy planning: comparison of the dose predictions using superposition algorithm and fluence map Monte Carlo method with radiochromic film measurements. Radiother Oncol 81:309–314. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2006.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farman AG, Sharma S, George DI, et al. (1985) Backscattering from dental restorations and splint materials during therapeutic radiation. Radiology 156:523–526. doi:10.1148/radiology.156.2.4011918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thilmann C, Adamietz IA, Ramm U, et al. (1996) In vivo dose increase in the presence of dental alloys during 60Co-gamma-ray therapy of the oral cavity. Med Dosim Off J Am Assoc Med Dosim 21:149–154

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chin DWH, Treister N, Friedland B, et al. (2009) Effect of dental restorations and prostheses on radiotherapy dose distribution: a Monte Carlo study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 10

  19. Wang R, Boyle A (1994) A convenient method for guarding against localized mucositis during radiation therapy. J Prosthodont 3:198–201. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00155.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reitemeier B, Reitemeier G, Schmidt A, et al. (2002) Evaluation of a device for attenuation of electron release from dental restorations in a therapeutic radiation field. J Prosthet Dent 87:323–327. doi:10.1067/mpr.2002.122506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Erickson KT, Rahimian J (2014) A technique to quantify and reduce backscatter due to metallic dental restoration in head and neck radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 90:S886. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.2527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Das IJ, Kahn FM (1989) Backscatter dose perturbation at high atomic number interfaces in megavoltage photon beams. Med Phys 16:367–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Verrone JR, Alves FA, Prado JD, et al. (2014) Benefits of an intraoral stent in decreasing the irradiation dose to oral healthy tissue: dosimetric and clinical features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 118:573–578. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2014.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson B, Sales L, Winston A, et al. (2013) Fabrication of customized tongue-displacing stents. J Am Dent Assoc 144:594–600. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arthur G. James Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Eric Allan, Lanchun Lu, Virginia Diavolitsis, Aashish Bhatt, John Grecula, Jessica Wobb & Dukagjin Blakaj

  2. Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Grosvenor Hall, Athens, OH, 45701, USA

    Hooman Hamedani

  3. Arthur G. James Cancer Center and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Department of Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W. 10th Ave., Columbus, OH, 43210, USA

    Tiffany Kessling & Meade Van Putten

Authors
  1. Eric Allan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lanchun Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hooman Hamedani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Virginia Diavolitsis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aashish Bhatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. John Grecula
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jessica Wobb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tiffany Kessling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Meade Van Putten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dukagjin Blakaj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dukagjin Blakaj.

Ethics declarations

Funding support

No funding support is associated with this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this study, formal consent is not required as there were no human participants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allan, E., Lu, L., Hamedani, H. et al. Dosimetric verification of dental stent efficacy in head and neck radiation therapy using modern radiation therapy techniques: quality of life and treatment compliance implications. J Radiat Oncol 5, 351–358 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-016-0268-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-016-0268-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation