Skip to main content
Log in

Somatotype analysis of freestyle wrestlers compared with nonathletes for health science research

  • Research article
  • Published:
Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to show somatotype and physical characteristic differences between freestyle wrestlers and nonathletes. Differences among weight categories for freestyle wrestlers were also examined. In this study, we first observed thirteen elite wrestlers and thirteen nonathletes. The participants were measured with the modified somatotype method of Heath-Carter, resulting in 3 kinds of somatotypes (endomorphic, mesomorphic, and ectomorphic) and 1 balanced type (central type). The nonathletes consisted of 4 endomorphic, 5 mesomorphic, 2 ectomorphic, and 2 central types. The wrestlers consisted of 12 mesomorphic types and only 1 ectomorphic type. Subdividing wrestler somatotypes resulted in 8 endomorphic mesomorph, 3 balanced mesomorph, and 2 mesomorph-ectomorph types. Wrestlers had higher weight, body mass index, and mesomorphic component values than did nonathletes. However, the wrestlers’ endomorphic and ectomorphic component values were lower than in the nonathletes. Furthermore, wrestlers in the heavy class tended to have higher endomorphic, very high mesomorphic, and lower ectomorphic component values. The data from our study provides in part physical characteristics of freestyle wrestlers that can be used to establish a reference for systemic study of sports health sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zaccagni, L. Anthropometric characteristics and body composition of Italian national wrestlers. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 12, 145–151 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grindstaff, T. L. & Potach, D. H. Prevention of common wrestling injuries. Strength Cond. J. 28, 20–28 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barroso, B. G. et al. Musculoskeletal injuries in wrestling athletes. Acta. Ortop. Bras. 19, 98–101 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lopez-Gullon, J. M. et al. Physical fitness differences between freestyle and Greco-Roman elite wrestlers. Arch. Budo. 7, 217–225 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. McGuigan, M. R., Winchester, J. B. & Erickson, T. The importance of isometric maximum strength in college wrestlers. J. Sports Sci. Med. 5, 108–113 (2006).

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vardar, S. A. et al. The relationship between body composition and anaerobic performance of elite young wrestlers. J. Sports Sci. Med. 6, 34–38 (2007).

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. International wrestling rule, www.fila-wrestling.com/Rule/Rule2014.pdf (2014).

  8. Yard, E. E. & Comstock, R. D. A comparison of pediatric freestyle and Greco-Roman wrestling injuries sustained during a 2006 US national tournament. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 18, 491–497 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamaner, F. et al. The injuries of Turkish national free-style and Graeco-Roman wrestlers. Med. Dello Sport. 65, 549–561 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yoon, J. Physiological profiles of elite senior wrestlers. Sports Med. 32, 225–233 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walker, R. N. & Tanner, J. M. Prediction of adult Sheldon somatotypes I and II from ratings and measurements at childhood ages. Ann. Hum. Biol. 7, 213–224 (1980).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Noh, J. W., Kim, J. H. & Kim, J. Somatotype analysis of Korean wrestling athletes compared with non-athletes for sports health sciences. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 5, 163–168 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Noh, J. W., Kim, J. H. & Kim, J. Somatotype analysis of elite taekwondo athletes compared with non-athletes for sports health sciences. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 5, 189–196 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Noh, J. W. et al. Somatotype analysis of elite boxing athletes compared with nonathletes for sports physiotherapy. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 26, 1231–1235 (2014).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Noh, J. W., Kim, J. H. & Kim, J. Somatotype analysis of elite judo athletes compared with nonathletes for health science research. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 6, 99–105, (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carter, J. E. The somatotypes of athletes-a review. Hum. Biol. 42, 535–569 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Heath, B. H. & Carter, J. E. A comparison of somatotype methods. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 24, 87–99 (1966).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heath, B. H. & Carter, J. E. A modified somatotype method. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 27, 57–74 (1967).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Heath, B. H. & Carter, J. E. Growth and somatotype patterns of Manus children, territory of Papua and New Guinea: application of a modified somatotype method to the study of growth patterns. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 35, 49–67 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jagiello, W. & Kruszewski, A. Morphological diversification of competitors training Greco-Roman style of wrestling. Arch. Budo. 5, 147–153 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aedma, M., Timpmann, S. & Ööpik, V. Effect of caffeine on upper-body anaerobic performance in wrestlers in simulated competition-day conditions. Int. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 23, 601–609 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Andreato, L. V. et al. Morphological profile of Brazilian jiu-jitsu elite athletes. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte. 18, 46–50 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sterkowicz-Przybycień, K. L., Sterkowicz, S. & Zarów, R. T. Somatotype, body composition and proportionality in polish top greco-roman wrestlers. J. Hum. Kinet. 28, 141–154 (2011).

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, S. M. et al. Differences in body components and electrical characteristics between youth soccer players and non-athletes. Health. 5, 1010–1015 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, J. H. et al. A review of signal transduction in mechanisms of smooth muscle contraction and its relevance for specialized physical therapy. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 25, 129–141 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, L. K. et al. A review of signal transduction of endothelin-1 and mitogen-activated protein kinaserelated pain for nanophysiotherapy. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 26, 789–792 (2014).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, J. H. et al. Change of muscular activity and dynamic stability of the knee joint due to excessive and repetitive jumping or cutting by female athletes. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 24, 715–719 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim, J. H. et al. Differences in body components and the significance of rehabilitation for taekwondo athletes compared to nonathletes. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 4, 203–208, (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junghwan Kim.

Additional information

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noh, JW., Kim, JH. & Kim, J. Somatotype analysis of freestyle wrestlers compared with nonathletes for health science research. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 6, 244–250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-014-0212-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-014-0212-y

Keywords

Navigation