Abstract
Explanations for the positive association between education and marriage in the United States emphasize the economic and cultural attractiveness of having a college degree in the marriage market. However, educational attainment may also shape the opportunities that men and women have to meet other college-educated partners, particularly in contexts with significant educational stratification. We focus on work—and the social ties that it supports—and consider whether the educational composition of occupations is important for marriage formation during young adulthood. Employing discrete-time event-history methods using the NLSY-97, we find that occupational education is positively associated with transitioning to first marriage and with marrying a college-educated partner for women but not for men. Moreover, occupational education is positively associated with marriage over cohabitation as a first union for women. Our findings call attention to an unexplored, indirect link between education and marriage that, we argue, offers insight into why college-educated women in the United States enjoy better marriage prospects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the multinomial regression analysis for marriage timing by spouse’s education, we exclude 102 ever-married respondents with missing information on their spouses’ education attainments, which leaves us with 6,235 NLSY-97 respondents: 2,892 females and 3,343 males. Additionally, in the multinomial regression analysis for the competing-risk model of first union type, we further exclude respondents who had ever cohabited before age 24 or have missing data on the date of first cohabitation, which leaves us with 3,815 NLSY-97 respondents. Among them, 1,575 are female, and 2,240 are male.
In the person-year data set used for estimating multinomial logistic regression models of transition to first union by union type (cohabitation or marriage), we include all person-years up to first union (either cohabitation or marriage) or last interview.
The NLSY-97 asks respondents about jobs and employers during each week in the year prior to each interview, which we then aggregated to a monthly measure. Primary jobs are those in which respondents reported spending the most time being employed in a given month. In the aggregated monthly data, only a small proportion of analytic person-month data (1.48 %) reported two or more “primary” jobs (i.e., experiencing changes in employers).
References
Allison, P. D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology, 13, 61–98.
Allison, P. D. (2009). Missing data. In R. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 72–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Allison, P. D. (2012). Analysis of tied or discrete data with PROC logistic. In P. Allison (Ed.), Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide (2nd ed., pp. 235–256). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Arum, R., Roksa, J., & Budig, M. J. (2008). The romance of college attendance: Higher education stratification and mate selection. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 26, 107–121.
Arun, S. V., Arun, T. G., & Borooah, V. K. (2004). The effect of career breaks on the working lives of women. Feminist Economics, 10, 65–84.
Bennett, N. G., Bloom, D. E., & Miller, C. K. (1995). The influence of nonmarital childbearing on the formation of first marriages. Demography, 32, 47–62.
Berk, R. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386–398.
Blackwell, D., & Lichter, D. (2004). Homogamy among dating, cohabiting, and married couples. Sociological Quarterly, 45, 719–737.
Blau, P. M. (1977). A macrosociological theory of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 26–54.
Brass, D. J. (1985). Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 327–343.
Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.
Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419.
Dex, S., Joshi, H., Macran, S., & McCulloch, A. (1998). Women’s employment transitions around childbearing. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60, 79–98.
DiMaggio, P., & Mohr, J. (1985). Cultural capital, educational attainment, and marital selection. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1231–1261.
Domina, T. (2006). Brain drain and brain gain: Rising educational segregation in the United States, 1940–2000. City & Community, 5, 387–407.
England, P. (2004). More mercenary mate selection? Comment on Sweeney and Cancian (2004) and Press (2004). Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1034–1037.
England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender. New York, NY: Aldine.
Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 1015–1035.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community, and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Fronczek, P., & Johnson, P. (2003). Occupations: 2000 (Census 2000 brief). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2003pubs/c2kbr-25.pdf
Fussell, E. (2002). The transition to adulthood in aging societies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 580(March), 16–39.
Gauthier, A. H., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2002). The transition to adulthood: A time use perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 580, 153–171.
Gibson-Davis, C. M., Edin, K., & McLanahan, S. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1301–1312.
Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2008). Transitions: Career and family life cycles of the educational elite. American Economic Review, 98, 363–369.
Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1986). Sex differences in the entry into marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 91–109.
Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 506–519.
Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2006). Births: Preliminary data for 2005 (National Vital Statistics Reports 55(11)). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Hauser, R. M., & Warren, J. R. (1997). Socioeconomic indexes of occupational status: A review, update, and critique. Sociological Methodology, 27, 177–298.
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.
Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1214–1230.
Hout, M. (2012). Social and economic returns to college education in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 379–400.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422–447.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Review, 38, 673–703.
Jargowsky, P. A. (1996). Take the money and run: Economic segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. American Sociological Review, 61, 984–998.
Joyner, K., & Kao, G. (2005). Interracial relationships and the transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 70, 563–581.
Kalmijn, M., & Flap, H. (2001). Assortative meeting and mating: Unintended consequences of organized settings for partner choices. Social Forces, 79, 1289–1312.
Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. (2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements. Demographic Research, 19(article 47), 1663–1692. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.47
Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. (2011, March–April). Cohabitation and trends in the structure and stability of children’s family lives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.
Kingston, P. W., Hubbard, R., Lapp, B., Schroeder, P., & Wilson, J. (2003). Why education matters. Sociology of Education, 76, 53–70.
Kuo, J. C.-L., & Raley, R. K. (2014). Is it all about money? Work characteristics and women’s and men’s marriage formation in early adulthood. Journal of Family Issues. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0192513X14530973
Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, S. K., & Oppenheimer, V. K. (2000). Educational assortative mating across marriage markets: Non-Hispanic whites in the United States. Demography, 37, 29–40.
Lichter, D. T., Anderson, R. N., & Hayward, M. D. (1995). Marriage markets and marital choice. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 412–431.
Lichter, D. T., McLaughlin, D. K., Kephart, G., & Landry, D. J. (1992). Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men? American Sociological Review, 57, 781–799.
Lim, S.-J. (2013, April). “Bad jobs” for marriage: Relationship between job quality and union formation in the context of labor market changes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, LA.
Lloyd, K. M., & South, S. J. (1996). Contextual influences on young men’s transition to first marriage. Social Forces, 74, 1097–1119.
Manning, W. D. (1993). Marriage and cohabitation following premarital conception. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 839–850.
Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32.
Martin, S. P. (2004). Women’s education and family timing: Outcomes and trends associated with age at marriage and first birth. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 79–118). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
Musick, K. (2002). Planned and unplanned childbearing among unmarried women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 915–929.
National Center for O*NET Development. (n.d.). Coding Assistance. O*NET Code Connector. Retrieved from http://www.onetcodeconnector.org/oca/step1
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563–591.
Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40, 127–149.
Oppenheimer, V. K., Kalmijn, M., & Lim, N. (1997). Men’s career development and marriage timing during a period of rising inequality. Demography, 34, 311–330.
Paull, G. (2008). Children and women’s hours of work. Economic Journal, 118, 8–27.
Press, J. E. (2004). Cute butts and housework: A gynocentric theory of assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1029–1033.
Raley, R. K. (1996). A shortage of marriageable men? A note on the role of cohabitation in black-white differences in marriage rates. American Sociological Review, 61, 973–983.
Raley, R. K. (2001). Increasing fertility in cohabitating unions: Evidence of the second demographic transition in the United States? Demography, 38, 59–66.
Raley, R. K., & Bratter, J. (2004). Not even if you were the last person on Earth! How marital search constraints affect the likelihood of marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 25, 167–181.
Raymo, J. M., & Iwasawa, M. (2005). Marriage market mismatches in Japan: An alternative view of the relationship between women’s education and marriage. American Sociological Review, 70, 801–822.
Rindfuss, R. R., & VandenHeuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population Development and Review, 16, 703–726.
Rosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77, 523–547.
Salmon, L. (1999). 1998 Standard Occupational Classification. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 38, 231–235.
Sassler, S. (2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 491–505.
Sassler, S., & Joyner, K. (2011). Social exchange and the progression of sexual relationships in emerging adulthood. Social Forces, 90, 223–246.
Schwartz, C., & Mare, R. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42, 621–646.
Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.
Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). “Everything’s there except money”: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680–696.
South, S. J. (1991). Sociodemographic differentials in mate selection preferences. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 928–940.
South, S. J., Trent, K., & Shen, Y. (2001). Changing partners: Toward a macrostructural-opportunity theory of marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 743–754.
Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., & Markman, H. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509.
Stewart, S., Stinnett, H., & Rosenfeld, L. B. (2000). Sex differences in desired characteristics of short-term and long-term relationship partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 843–853.
Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67, 132–147.
Sweeney, M. M. (2010). The reproductive context of cohabitation in the United States: Recent change and variation in contraceptive use. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1155–1170.
Sweeney, M. M., & Cancian, M. (2004). The changing importance of white women’s economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1015–1028.
Swidler, A. (2001). Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Teachman, J. D. (1995). The influence of school enrollment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60, 762–774.
Torr, B. M. (2011). The changing relationship between education and marriage in the United States, 1940–2000. Journal of Family History, 36, 483–503.
Upchurch, D. M., Lillard, L. A., & Panis, C. W. A. (2001). The impact of nonmarital childbearing on subsequent marital formation and dissolution. In L. Wu & B. Wolfe (Eds.), Out of wedlock: Trends, causes, and consequences of nonmarital fertility (pp. 344–382). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Families and living arrangements: Estimated median age at first marriage, by sex: 1890 to the present (Table MS-2) [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/tabMS-2.pdf
White, I. R., Royston, P., & Wood, A. M. (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 377–399.
Wildsmith, E., & Raley, R. K. (2006). Race-ethnic differences in nonmarital fertility: A focus on Mexican American women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 491–508.
Xie, Y., Raymo, J. M., Goyette, K., & Thornton, A. (2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40, 351–367.
Xie, Y., & Shaumann, K. A. (2005). Women in science: Career processes and outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Acknowledgments
This research is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under Grant Nos. R21 HD068807-01 and R24 HD042849 as well as the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award T32 HD007081-35. This article was previously presented at the 2013 annual meetings of the Population Association of America. We are grateful for helpful comments and suggestions by participants in the PAA session as well as to the Education in the Transition to Adulthood group at the University of Texas at Austin. The authors are solely responsible for any opinions or errors in the analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McClendon, D., Kuo, J.CL. & Raley, R.K. Opportunities to Meet: Occupational Education and Marriage Formation in Young Adulthood. Demography 51, 1319–1344 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0313-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0313-x