Microcredit and Domestic Violence in Bangladesh: An Exploration of Selection Bias Influences
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This article explores the relationship between women’s participation in microcredit groups and domestic violence in Bangladesh. Several recent studies have raised concern about microcredit programs by reporting higher levels of violence among women who are members. These results, however, may be attributable to selection bias because members might differ from nonmembers in ways that make them more susceptible to violence to begin with. Using a sample of currently married women from the 2007 Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey (BDHS) (N = 4,195), we use propensity score matching (PSM) as a way of exploring selection bias in this relationship. Results suggest that the previously seen strong positive association between membership and violence does not hold when an appropriate comparison group, generated using PSM, is used in the analyses. Additional analyses also suggest that levels of violence do not differ significantly between members and nonmembers and instead could depend on context-specific factors related to poverty. Members for whom a match is not found report considerably higher levels of violence relative to nonmembers in the unmatched group. The background characteristics of members and nonmembers who do not match suggest that they are more likely to be younger and from relatively well-to-do households.
- Amin, S., Basu, A., & Stephenson, R. (2002). Spatial variation in contraceptive use in Bangladesh: Looking beyond the borders. Demography, 39, 251–267. CrossRef
- Amin, S., Diamond, I., & Steele, F. (1997). Contraception and religious practice in Bangladesh. In G. W. Jones, J. C. Caldwell, R. M. Douglas, & R. M. D’Souza (Eds.), The continuing demographic transition (pp. 268–289). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2009). The experimental approach to development economics. Annual Review of Economics, 1, 151–178. CrossRef
- Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. (2009). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation (Working paper). Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Economics and Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.
- Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet, 359, 1331–1336. CrossRef
- Dehejia, R., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151–161. CrossRef
- Diop-Sidibe, N. (2001). Domestic violence against women in Egypt: Risk factors and health out-comes of wife beating (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
- Duvendack, M., Palmer-Jones, R., Copestake, J. G., Hooper, L., Loke, Y., Rao, N. (2011). What is the evidence of the impact of microfinance on the well-being of poor people? (EPPI-Centre Report No. 1912). London, UK: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
- Ellsberg, M. C., Pefia, R., Herrera, A., Liljestrand, J., & Winkvist, A. (1999). Wife abuse among women of childbearing age in Nicaragua. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 241–244. CrossRef
- Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data—Or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography, 38, 115–132.
- Gazmararian, J. A., Adams, M. M., & Pamuk, E. R. (1996). Associations between measures of socioeconomic status and maternal health behavior. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, 108–115.
- Goetz, A. M., & Sen Gupta, R. (1996). Who takes the credit? Gender, power and control over loan use in rural credit programmes in Bangladesh. World Development, 24, 45–63. CrossRef
- Hashemi, S. M., Schuler, S. R., & Riley, A. P. (1996). Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development, 24, 635–653. CrossRef
- Heise, L. L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4, 262–290. CrossRef
- Jalan, J., & Ravallion, M. (2003). Estimating the benefit incidence of an antipoverty program by propensity score matching. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 21, 19–30. CrossRef
- Jewkes, R. (2002). Intimate partner violence: Causes and prevention. Lancet, 359, 1423–1429. CrossRef
- Kabeer, N. (2001). Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh. World Development, 29, 63–84. CrossRef
- Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2010). Expanding credit access: Using randomized supply decisions to estimate the impacts. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 433–464. CrossRef
- Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2011). Microcredit in theory and practice: Using randomized credit scoring for impact evaluation. Science, 322, 1278–1284. CrossRef
- Khandker, S. R. (2005). Microfinance and poverty: Evidence using panel data from Bangladesh. World Bank Economic Review, 19, 263–286. CrossRef
- Kishor, S. (2005). Domestic violence measurement in the demographic and health surveys: The history and the challenges (Expert paper prepared for the UN Division for the Advancement of Women). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
- Kishor, S., & Johnson, K. (2006). Reproductive health and domestic violence: Are the poorest women uniquely disadvantaged? Demography, 43, 293–307. CrossRef
- Koenig, M. A., Ahmed, S., Hossain, M. B., & Mozumder, A. (2003). Women’s status and domestic violence in rural Bangladesh: Individual- and community-level effects. Demography, 40, 269–288. CrossRef
- Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2003). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing (Version 1.2.3). Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html
- Montgomery, R., Bhattacharya, D., & Hulme, D. (1996). Credit for the poor in Bangladesh. In D. Hulme & P. Mosley (Eds.), Finance against poverty (pp. 123–227). London, UK: Routledge.
- Morduch, J. (1998). Does microfinance really help the poor? New evidence from flagship programs in Bangladesh (RPDS Working Paper No. 198). Princeton, NJ: Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University.
- National Institute of Population Research and Training (NIPORT), Mitra and Associates, and Macro International. (2009). Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey 2007. Dhaka, Bangladesh, and Calverton, MD: National Institute of Population Research and Training, Mitra and Associates, and Macro International.
- Naved, R., & Persson, L. (2005). Factors associated with spousal physical violence against women in Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 36, 289–300. CrossRef
- Pitt, M., & Khandker, S. (1998). The impact of group-based credit on poor households in Bangladesh: Does the gender of participants matter? Journal of Political Economy, 106, 958–996. CrossRef
- Pitt, M. M., Khandker, S. R., McKernan, S. M., & Latif, M. A. (1999). Credit programs for the poor and reproductive behavior in low-income countries: Are the reported causal relationships the result of heterogeneity bias? Demography, 36, 1–21. CrossRef
- Pronyk, P., Hargreaves, J., Kim, J., Morison, L., Phetla, G., Watts, C., & Porter, J. (2009). Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: A cluster randomized trial. The Lancet, 368, 1973–1983. CrossRef
- Rahman, A. (1986). Impact of Grameen Bank on the situation of poor rural women (BIDS Working Paper No. 1). Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute for Development Studies.
- Rahman, A. (1999). Micro-credit initiatives for equitable and sustainable development: Who pays? World Development, 27, 67–82. CrossRef
- Robsenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. CrossRef
- Roodman, D., & Morduch, J. (2009). The impact of microcredit on the poor in Bangladesh: Revisiting the evidence (CGD Working Paper No. 174). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
- Schuler, S. R., & Hashemi, S. M. (1994). Credit programs, women’s empowerment, and contraceptive use in rural Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 25, 65–76. CrossRef
- Schuler, S. R., Hashemi, S. M., & Badal, S. H. (1998). Men’s violence against women in rural Bangladesh: Undermined or exacerbated by microcredit programmes? Development in Practice, 8, 148–157. CrossRef
- Schuler, S. R., Hashemi, S. M., Riley, A. P., & Akhter, S. (1996). Credit programs, patriarchy and men’s violence against women in rural Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine, 43, 1729–1742. CrossRef
- Steele, F., Amin, S., & Naved, R. T. (2001). Savings/credit group formation and change in contraception. Demography, 38, 267–282. CrossRef
- Straus, M. A. (1990). Manual for the conflict tactics scales. Durham: Family Research Laboratory, University of New Hampshire.
- World Bank. (2009). Gender-based violence, health and the role of the health sector (Online brief). Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Microcredit and Domestic Violence in Bangladesh: An Exploration of Selection Bias Influences
Volume 50, Issue 5 , pp 1819-1843
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Domestic violence
- Propensity score matching
- Industry Sectors