Marital Sorting and Parental Wealth
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The extent of marital sorting by socioeconomic background has implications for the intergenerational transmission of inequality, the role of marriage as a mechanism for social mobility, and the extent of cross-group interactions within a society. However, studies of assortative mating have disproportionately focused on spouses’ education, rather than their social origins. Using data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), and exploiting the unique genealogical design of the data set, we study the degree to which spouses sort on the basis of parental wealth. We find that the estimated correlation in parental wealth among married spouses, after controlling for race and age, is about .4. Importantly, we show that controlling for spousal education explains only one-quarter of sorting based on parental wealth. We show that our results are robust to accounting for measurement error in spousal reports of parental wealth and for selection into and out of marriage.
- Barsky, R., Bound, J., Charles, K. K., & Lupton, J. P. (2002). Accounting for the black-white wealth gap: A nonparametric approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 663–673. CrossRef
- Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846. CrossRef
- Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: Wiley.
- Burgess, E. W., & Wallin, P. (1943). Homogamy in social characteristics. The American Journal of Sociology, 49, 109–124. CrossRef
- Centers, R. (1949). Marital selection and occupational strata. The American Journal of Sociology, 54, 530–535. CrossRef
- Charles, K. K., & Hurst, E. (2003). The correlation of wealth across generations. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 1155–1182. CrossRef
- Conley, D. (1999). Being black, living in the red: Race, wealth, and social policy in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Epstein, E., & Guttman, R. (1984). Mate selection in man: Evidence, theory, and outcome. Biodemography and Social Biology, 31, 243–278. CrossRef
- Fernández, R., & Rogerson, R. (2001). Sorting and long-run inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1305–1341. CrossRef
- Hout, M. (1982). The associations between husbands’ and wives’ occupation in two-earner families. The American Journal of Sociology, 88, 397–409. CrossRef
- Kalmijn, M. (1991). Status homogamy in the United States. The American Journal of Sociology, 97, 496–523. CrossRef
- Kremer, M. (1997). How much does sorting increase inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 115–139. CrossRef
- Lam, D. (1988). Marriage markets and assortative mating with household public goods: Theoretical results and empirical implications. Journal of Human Resources, 23, 462–487. CrossRef
- Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32. CrossRef
- Mulligan, C. B. (1997). Parental priorities and economic inequality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Oliver, M. L., & Shapiro, T. M. (1995). Black wealth/white wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York: Routledge.
- Pagnini, D. L., & Morgan, S. P. (1990). Intermarriage and social distance among U.S. immigrants at the turn of the century. The American Journal of Sociology, 96, 405–432. CrossRef
- Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1968–2007 Family, 1968–2007 Cross-Year Individual, public use data sets. (2010). Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with primary funding from the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Aging, and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Ann Arbor, MI.
- Pencavel, J. (1998). Assortative mating by schooling and the work behavior of wives and husbands. American Economic Review, 88, 326–329.
- Rubin, Z. (1968). Do American women marry up? American Sociological Review, 33, 750–760. CrossRef
- Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42, 621–646. CrossRef
- Solon, G. (1992). Intergenerational income mobility in the United States. American Economic Review, 82, 393–408.
- Solon, G. (1999). Intergenerational mobility in the labor market. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, pp. 1761–1800). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
- Uunk, W. J. G., Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Róbert, P. (1996). Bivariate and multivariate scaled association models. An application to homogamy of social origin and education in Hungary between 1930 and 1979. Quality and Quantity, 30, 323–343.
- Zimmerman, D. J. (1992). Regression toward mediocrity in economic stature. American Economic Review, 82, 409–429.
- Marital Sorting and Parental Wealth
Volume 50, Issue 1 , pp 51-70
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Social mobility
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, 1155 E. 60th Street, Ste. 164, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
- 2. Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
- 3. Department of Sociology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA