Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Swimming together: adaptation through emergence of knowledge and learning in networked watershed governance

  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Networked governance plays an important role in watershed planning and management to address complex environmental problems in social-ecological systems (SESs), in large part attributable to the need for multi-disciplinary knowledge. Networks integrate and make available different types of knowledge and foster social learning needed to respond to and cope with uncertainties, critical for building adaptive capacity for the governance of an SES. Through the case of a self-organized governance network of public, private, and nongovernmental organizations in the Chagrin River watershed in northeastern Ohio, we explore how such learning happens, revealing the types of learning that built adaptive capacity, the settings in which learning took place, and the practices that gave rise to learning. We also discuss how the network became the mechanism through which collaboration for watershed governance became adaptive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Argyris C (2003) A life full of learning. Organ Stud 24(7):1178–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspective. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris C, Schön D (1996) Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D, Berkes F, Doubleday N (2007) Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R (2008) Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Glob Environ Chang 18(1):86–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson-Palombo C, Gebremichael M (2012) Creating a learning organization to promote sustainable water resources management in Ethiopia. Journal of Sustainability Education 3.

  • Bell S (2002) Economic governance and institutional dynamics. Oxford University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F (2009) Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manag 90(5):1692–1702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin O, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a different? Glob Environ Chang 19:366–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRWP (2009) Watershed plan. Author published, Willoughby

    Google Scholar 

  • CRWP (2015) Annual report. Author published, Willoughby

    Google Scholar 

  • CRWP (Chagrin River Watershed Partners) (2017a) Retrieved from http://crwp.org/index.php/about-us/mission-history.

  • CRWP (Chagrin River Watershed Partners) (2017b) Retrieved from http://crwp.org/index.php/projects/research-projects/153-climate-resilience-gi.

  • Encyclopedia of Cleveland History (1997) Chagrin River. Retrieved from http://ech.case.edu/cgi/article.pl?id=CR1. Accessed 16 July 2016.

  • Folke C, Colding J, Berkes F (2003) Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. In: Folke C, Colding J, Berkes, F (eds) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 352–387.

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30:524–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Chapin III FS, Olsson P (2009) Transformations in ecosystem stewardship. In: Chapin III FS, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 103–125.

  • Haas PM (2004) Addressing the global governance deficit. Global Environmental Politics 4:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn T, Olsson P, Folke C, Johansson K (2006) Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Hum Ecol 34:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MT (2002) Knowledge networks: explaining effective knowledge sharing in multi unit companies. Organ Sci 13(3):232–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy S (2007) Not so Eerie Anymore: the promise of collaborative watershed management in the Lake Erie Basin. Dissertation, The Ohio State University.

  • Hufty M (2011) Investigating policy processes: the governance analytical framework (GAF). In: Wiesmann U, Hurni H (eds) Research for sustainable development: foundations, experiences, and perspectives, Geographica Bernensia, Bern, Switzerland, pp 403–424

  • Innes J, Booher D (2010) Planning with complexity: an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge, London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg W, Keating D (2011) Cleveland EcoVillage: green and affordable housing through a strategic alliance network. Housing Policy Debate (Special Edition) 21(1):69–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg WA, Samanta A (2017) Network structure and adaptive capacity in watershed governance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management doi: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1287063.

  • Kilvington M (2010) Building capacity for social learning in environmental management. Dissertation, Lincoln University.

  • Koontz TM, Sen S (2013) Community responses to government defunding of watershed projects: a comparative study in India and the USA. Environ Manag 58:571–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebeskind J, Oliver AL, Zucker L, Brewer M (1996) Social networks, learning and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms. Organ Sci 7:428–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morçöl G (2012) A complexity theory for public policy. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2014) Walter B. Jones Memorial & NOAA Excellence Awards for Coastal and Ocean Resource Management. Retrieved from http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/jone-noaawards-2014winners.html. Accessed 14 July 2016.

  • Newig J, Gunther D, Pahl-Wostl C (2010) Synapses in the network: learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecol Soc 15(4):24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole L (1997) Treating networks seriously: practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Adm Rev 57(1):45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohio Balanced Growth (2017) Ohio Balanced Growth Program. Retrieved from http://balancedgrowth.ohio.gov/Home.aspx. Accessed 23 March 2017.

  • Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) (2017) ODNR Division of Water Resources: watershed management. Retrieved from http://water.ohiodnr.gov/water-conservation/watershed-management#WATP. Accessed 23 March 2017.

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004) Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social–ecological systems. Environ Manag 34(1):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(39):15181–15187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325.

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analyzing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change: Human Policy Dimensions 19(3):354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2)

  • Primmer E (2011) Policy, project and operational networks: channels and conduits for learning in forest biodiversity conservation. Forest Policy Econ 13:132–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed M, Evely A, Cundill G, Fazey I, Glass J, Laing A, Newig J, Parrish B, Prell C, Raymond C, Stringer L (2010) What is social learning? Ecol Soc 15(4):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley AL (2009) Putting a price on riparian corridors as water treatment facilities. San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland

  • Roux, D, Murrray K, van Wyk, E (2008) Learning to learn for social-ecological resilience: balancing strategy options in public sector organizations. In: Burns MER, Weaver, A (eds) Exploring sustainabiltiy science: a Southern African perspective, Stellenbosch: African Sun Media, pp599–625

  • Sandstrom C (2009) Institutional dimensions of comanagement: participation, power and process. Soc Nat Resour 22(3):230–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter M, Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Mechanisms of resilience on common-pool resource management systems: an agent-based model of water use in a river basin. Ecol Soc 12(2):4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin MH (2009) Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. SAGE, Los Angeles; London.

  • United States Census (2011) American Community Survey/Fact Finder. Retrieved from http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml. Accessed May 2013.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2016) Stormwater phase II final rule: small MS4 stormwater program overview. Retrieved from http://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/fact2-0.pdf. Accessed 17 January 2016.

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1998) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (2000) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7(2):225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder WM (2002) Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The interview schedule and its administration were reviewed and approved by our institution’s review board. The authors thank the reviewers for their comments and advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urban Studies, Levin College of Urban Affairs, Cleveland State University, 1717 Euclid Ave. UR 308, Cleveland, OH, 44115, USA

    Aritree Samanta & Wendy A. Kellogg

Authors
  1. Aritree Samanta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wendy A. Kellogg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aritree Samanta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samanta, A., Kellogg, W.A. Swimming together: adaptation through emergence of knowledge and learning in networked watershed governance. J Environ Stud Sci 7, 403–415 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0428-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0428-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation