Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Promoting resilience in a regional seafood system: New England and the Fish Locally Collaborative

  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article explores problems and solutions in the New England groundfish fishery, where social, economic, environmental, and food system sustainability are major challenges. With industrialization of fishing during the past century, managers have turned a blind eye to issues of scale (e.g., industrial scale vs. community scale), which has led to chronic overfishing. There have been recurring stock collapses of favored species (e.g., cod) during the past 50 years despite federal government management of the fishery during most of that period. Small- and medium-scale fishermen—with better local knowledge, motivation for local sustainability, and smaller ecological footprints—have increasingly been displaced by large-scale operations, especially during recent years with policies that are privatizing fisheries access and consolidating the fleet. Coastal fishing communities and the fishery have suffered. The Fish Locally Collaborative (FLC)—an international decentralized network of fishermen and their allies—is promoting a paradigm shift. Its efforts to keep the smaller-scale boats afloat and support local communities include economic and political strategies. Defining value with quadruple bottom line accounting (i.e., assessing social, economic, environmental, and food system impacts), the FLC promotes a shift from high-volume/low-value production to low volume/high value. The FLC has reestablished local food supply chains with community-supported fisheries, public seafood markets, and “boat-to-hospital” and “boat-to-school” programs based on procurement contracts that specify local and sustainable catch. FLC participants promote the consumption of lesser-known fish species to motivate more balanced and ecologically sustainable fishing. Politically, FLC participants continue to build the strength of the network and engage in policy discussions at local, national, and international levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Northwest Atlantic Marine Alliance believes that more subzones are necessary to accurately reflect distinct groundfish habitats, based upon the research of Ted Ames and the Penobscot East Resource Center.

  2. Niaz Dorry, Draft proposal for Andrus Family Fund, October 23, 2008.

  3. In 2007, the United Nations Human Rights Committee ruled in the case of Iceland that privatized Catch Share systems violate international law and the human rights of fishermen. The Catch Share system was dismantled (Food & Water Watch 2011).

  4. Except in some North Pacific fisheries, where corporate ownership is not allowed (Brinson and Thunberg 2013).

  5. In addition, in 2014, NEFMC voted to reduce minimum fish sizes and minimum mesh sizes and exempted sector vessels from previously closed areas.

  6. Climate change is an increasingly important factor: The Gulf of Maine is warming faster than 99 % of the world’s oceans, and its groundfish are leaving for colder waters (Freedman 2014).

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Colles Stowell, Boyce Thorne Miller, Shira Tiffany, and Niaz Dorry for their thoughtful comments and help in improving the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett Tolley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tolley, B., Gregory, R. & Marten, G.G. Promoting resilience in a regional seafood system: New England and the Fish Locally Collaborative. J Environ Stud Sci 5, 593–607 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0343-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0343-8

Keywords

Navigation