Abstract
Claims about social change and the dynamics of power permeate the environmental science and studies (ESS) curriculum. These claims are frequently implicit, under examined, and contradictory. Their acritical internalization by students and faculty can undermine the efficacy and relevance of an ESS education. This essay describes 15 such claims and summarizes patterns of ESS student response from three workshops. We make no argument about which claims are superior, how social change occurs, or how political power is best analyzed. Instead, we seek to encourage those who design and deliver ESS programs to become more self-critical and intentional when disseminating, however unwittingly, claims about power and social change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clark S, Rutherford M, Auer M, Cherney D, Wallace R, Mattson D et al (2011) College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (part 1): integrating knowledge, education, and action for a better world? Environ Manag 47:701–715
Dryzek J (2013) The politics of the earth: environmental discourses. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Durkheim, E (1982) [1895] Lukes S (ed) The rules of sociological method and selected texts on sociology and its method. W. D. Halls (translator). Free Press, New York
Keyes R (2006) The quote verifier: who said what, where, and when. St. Martin’s Griffin, New York
Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G (2012) Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sci 45(2):123–152
Litfin K (1995) Framing science: precautionary discourse and the ozone treaties. Millennium J Int Stud 24(2):251–277
Maniates M (2010) Editing out unsustainable behavior. In: Assadourian E (ed) State of the world 2010. WW Norton, New York, pp 119–126
Maniates M (2013) Teaching for turbulence. In: Assadourian E, Prugh T (eds) State of the world 2013. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 255–268
Merton R (1968) Social theory and social structure. Simon and Schuster, New York
Olson M (1965) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of group. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Palmer P (2010) The courage to teach: exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. Wiley, New York
Perkins R (2003) Technological “lock-in”. Online encyclopaedia of ecological economics at http://isecoeco.org/pdf/techlkin.pdf
Princen T (2010) Consumer sovereignty, heroic sacrifice: two insidious concepts in an endlessly expansionist economy. In: Maniates M, Meyer J (eds) The environmental politics of sacrifice. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 145–164
Proctor J, Clark S, Smith K, Wallace R (2013) A manifesto for theory in environmental studies and sciences. J Environ Stud Sci 3:331–337
Stolle D, Micheletti M (2013) Political consumerism: global responsibility in action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgments
The authors thank D Fuchs, A Di Giulio, K Glaab, S Lorek, and I Røpke for the helpful conversations that contributed to the formulation of this paper. Michael Maniates acknowledges with gratitude the support of Yale-NUS College (through grant number R-607-264-049-121).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maniates, M., Princen, T. Fifteen claims: social change and power in environmental studies. J Environ Stud Sci 5, 213–217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0247-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0247-7