Resurrecting the conservation movement
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Conservationists are losing the battle to protect nature because they are failing to connect with the hearts, anxieties, and minds of a large segment of the American public. If conservationists are to move beyond their current base of support, they must reach out and connect to new audiences across the political, economic, and social spectra. Here, we present data from two national surveys examining attitudes about the protection of nature. These surveys show that the public does not believe a tradeoff necessarily exists between the health of the economy and the health of the environment. Moreover, certain groups, including those who do not identify themselves as environmentalists, find benefits to people to be a convincing rationale for protecting nature, and a better rationale than the intrinsic value of nature. Based on these findings, we recommend conservationists vigorously challenge claims that environmental protection will damage the economy. We also recommend a new message frame that emphasizes the value of protecting nature in terms of benefits to people, and to highlight the connection between protecting land and water and preserving their immediate quality of life and their children’s quality of life.
- ABC News/Planet Green/Stanford University (2008) Fuel costs boost conservation efforts; 7 in 10 reducing “carbon footprint”. http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1067a1Environment2008.pdf.
- Angermeier PL (2000) The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conserv Biol 14:373–381 CrossRef
- Bowman K, Rugg A (2010) Polls on the environment and global warming. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. http://www.aei.org/files/2010/04/22/20100422-Environment.pdf.
- Chameides WL (2011) EPA in the crosshairs. Science 332:397 CrossRef
- Kraft ME, Vig NJ (2013) Environmental policy over four decades: achievements and new directions. In: Vig NJ, Kraft ME (eds) Environmental policy: new directions for the twenty-first century, 8th edn. Sage, Los Angeles, pp 2–29
- Kroeger T (2012) Dollars and sense: economic benefits and impacts from two oyster reef restoration projects in the the northern Gulf of Mexico. The Nature Conservancy. http://www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/oyster-restoration-study-kroeger.pdf.
- Leisher C, Beukering Pv, Scherl LM (2008) Nature’s investment bank: how marine protected areas contribute to poverty reduction. The Nature Conservancy/WWF International. http://www.nature.org/initiatives/protectedareas/files/mpa_report.pdf.
- McCauley DJ (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443:27–28 CrossRef
- Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw MR (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):4–11 CrossRef
- Ortman JM, Guarneri CE (2009) United States population projections: 2000 to 2050. United State Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/analytical-document09.pdf.
- Pabon-Zamora L (2009) Valuing nature: why Indonesia’s marine protected areas matter for economic and human wellbeing. The Nature Conservancy.
- Soulé M (1985) What is conservation biology? Bioscience 35:727–734 CrossRef
- Turner JM (2009) “The specter of environmentalism”: wilderness, environmental politics, and the evolution of the new right. J Am Hist 96:123–148 CrossRef
- U.S. Census Bureau (2012) Most children younger than age 1 are minorities, census bureau reports. http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/population/cb12-90.html. Accessed August 22 2012
- White R (1996) Are you an environmentalist, or do you work for a living? In: Cronon W (ed) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. Norton, New York, pp 171–185
- Whittaker M, Segura GM, Bowler S (2005) Racial/ethnic group attitudes toward environmental protection in California: is “environmentalism” still a white phenomenon? Polit Res Q 58:435–447
- Yale Environment Survey (2004) The environmental deficit: survey on American attitudes on the environment. Yale University School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. http://environment.research.yale.edu/documents/downloads/v-z/yale_enviro_poll.pdf.
- Resurrecting the conservation movement
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences
Volume 2, Issue 4 , pp 291-295
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Ecosystem services
- Public opinion
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA, 95053, USA
- 2. Conservation Campaigns, The Nature Conservancy, 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100, Arlington, VA, 22203-1606, USA