Abstract
The main objective of this study is to identify components of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching, associated with the knowledge of mathematical horizon (KMH) in order to describe this type of knowledge from the viewpoint of elementary school mathematics teachers. The research population of this study consisted of 118 elementary school mathematics teachers who responded to an open-ended questionnaire. Findings of this study illustrate that KMH can be considered as a separate category according to teachers’ voice. An analysis of teachers’ utterances resulted in three KMH characteristics: insight of subject matter, mathematical connections, and understanding of meta-mathematics.
References
Aubrey, C. (1997). Mathematics teaching in the early years: an investigation of teachers’ subject knowledge. London: The Falmer Press.
Ball, D. L. & Bass, H. (2009). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: knowing mathematics for teaching to learners’ mathematical futures. Paper prepared based on keynote address at the 43rd Jahrestagung für Didaktik der Mathematik held in Oldenburg, Germany.
Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching. American Educator, 29(1), 14–17. 20–22, 43–46.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Bass, H., & Ball, D. L. (2004). A practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching: the case of mathematical reasoning. In W. Jianpan & X. Binyan (Eds.), Trends and challenges in mathematics education (pp. 107–123). Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
Begle, E. (1972). Teacher knowledge and student achievement in algebra. School Mathematics Study Group Reports, Number 9. Washington, D.C: Stanford University, California School Mathematics Study Group, National Science Foundation.
Begle, E., & Geeslin, W. (1972). Teacher effectiveness in mathematics instruction. N. 28. Washington D.C.: NCTM.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Butts, R. F., & Cremin, L. A. (1953). A History of Education in American Culture. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Charalambous, C., Panaoura, A., & Philippou, G. (2009). Using the history of mathematics to induce changes in preservice teachers’ beliefs and attitudes: insights from evaluating a teacher education program. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(2), 161–180.
Clemente, M., & Ramirez, E. (2008). How teachers express their knowledge through narrative. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 24(5), 1244–1258.
Cooper, P., & McIntyre, D. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press.
de Freitas, E. (2004). Plotting intersections along the political axis: the interior voice of dissenting mathematics teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1–3), 259–274.
Drake, C. (2006). Turning points: Using teachers’ mathematics life stories to understand implementation of mathematics education reform materials. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(6), 579–608.
Eisenberg, T. (1977). Begle revisited: teacher knowledge and student achievement in algebra. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 216–222.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147–164). New York: Macmillan.
Fernández, S., Figueiras, L., Deulofeu, J., & Martinez, M. (2011). Re-defining HCK to approach transition. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2640–2649). Poland: University of Rzeszów.
Foster, C. (2011). Peripheral mathematical knowledge. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(3), 24–26.
Grossman, P. L., Wilson, S. M., & Shulman, L. S. (1989). Teachers of substance: subject matter knowledge for teaching. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher (pp. 23–36). New York: Pergamon.
Hill, H. C., Sleep, L., Lewis, J. M., & Ball, D. L. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge: what knowledge matters and what evidence counts? In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 111–155). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Kaasila, R. (2007). Mathematical biography and key rhetoric. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 373–384.
Kaasila, R., Hannula, M. S., Laine, A., & Pehkonen, E. (2008). Socio-emotional orientations and teacher change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 111–123.
Kennedy, M. (2004). Reform ideals and teachers’ practical intentions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(13). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/168.
Kilpatrick, J. (1992). A history of research in mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 3–38). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Klein, F. (1932). Elementary mathematics from an advanced standpoint. Arithmetic, Algebra, Analysis. Translated from the third German edition by E. R. Hedrick & C. A. Noble. New York: Macmillan.
Leikin, R. (2006). Learning by teaching: the case of Sieve of Eratosthenes and one elementary school teacher. In R. Zazkis & S. Campbell (Eds.), Number Theory in Mathematics Education: Perspectives and Prospects (pp. 115–140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mamolo, A., & Zazkis, R. (2011). Reaching out to the horizon: teachers’ use of advanced mathematical knowledge. Portland, Oregon: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on Research in undergraduate mathematics education.
Nardi, E., Biza, I., & Zachariades, T. (2011). ‘Warrant’ revisited: integrating mathematics teachers’ pedagogical and epistemological considerations into Toulmin’s model for argumentation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 157–173.
Oslund, J. A. (2012). Mathematics-for-teaching: what can be learned from the ethnopoetics of teachers’ stories? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 293–309.
Phelps, C. M. (2010). Factors that pre-service elementary teachers perceive as affecting their motivational profiles in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(3), 293–309.
Prediger, S. (2010). How to develop mathematics for teaching and for understanding: the case of meanings of the equal sign. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 73–93.
Roche, A., & Clarke, D. M. (2013). Primary teachers’ representations of division: assessing mathematical knowledge that has pedagogical potential. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 257–278.
Ross, S., & Pratt-Coffer, M. (1999). Subtraction in the United States: an historical perspective. The Mathematics Educator, 10(2), 49–56.
Sabar Ben-Yehoshua, N. (1997). Qualitative research in teaching and learning. Tel Aviv: Moden Publishing. [Hebrew].
Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education (tools and processes in mathematics teacher education, Vol. 2, pp. 321–354). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Scott, A., Clarkson, P., & McDonough, A. (2012). Professional learning and action research: early career teachers reflect on their practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(2), 129–151.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Van der Valk, T. A. E., & Broekman, H. G. B. (1999). The lesson preparation method: a way of investigating pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Teacher Education, 22(1), 11–22.
Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. (1987). “150 different ways of knowing”: representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teacher thinking (pp. 104–124). Sussex, UK: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Zazkis, R., & Mamolo, A. (2011). Reconceptualising knowledge at the mathematical horizon. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 8–13.
Zazkis, R., & Mamolo, A. (2012). Continuing conversations towards the horizon. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(1), 22–25.
Zhang, O., & Stephens, M. (2013). Utilising a construct of teacher capacity to examine national curriculum reform in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(4), 481–502.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was funded by the Research Committee of Achva Academic College.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guberman, R., Gorev, D. Knowledge concerning the mathematical horizon: a close view. Math Ed Res J 27, 165–182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0136-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0136-5