A Multi-criteria Multi-stakeholder Industrial Projects Prioritization in Gaza Strip Authors
Research Article - Systems Engineering
First Online: 17 November 2012 Received: 02 August 2009 Accepted: 23 July 2011 DOI:
Cite this article as: Agha, S.R., Jarbo, M.H. & Matr, S.J. Arab J Sci Eng (2013) 38: 1217. doi:10.1007/s13369-012-0346-7 Abstract
This research presents a decision support methodology for selection decisions in which Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model is used to prioritize main industries in Gaza Strip not only from the view point of a single stakeholder and a single criteria, but also from that of multiple stakeholders and multiple criteria. Literature review, in addition to experts’ interviews were used to identify the main selection criteria and sub-criteria. These main criteria are economic criteria, financial criteria, marketing, technical, political and social, and environmental criteria. In addition, the alternatives were identified via Palestinian Federation of Industries (PFI). These alternatives are food industries, garment industries, chemical industries, plastic industries, wood industries, metal industries, and construction industries. Results show that different stakeholders choose different alternatives. The aggregate ranking of the industries under consideration is as follows: food, garment, construction, wood, chemical, metal, and plastics.
Keywords MCDM AHP Industrial projects Prioritization Selection Download to read the full article text References
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
Ho W.: Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications—a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
(5), 211–228 (2008)
Vaidya O., Kumar S.: Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
(1), 1–29 (2006)
MathSciNet MATH CrossRef
Parsaei H., Wilhelm M.: A justification methodology for automated manufacturing technologies. Comput. Ind. Eng.
(3), 363–373 (1989)
Yang C., Chen B.: Supplier selection using combined analytical hierarchy process and grey relational analysis. J. Manuf. Technol. Manage.
(7), 926–941 (2006)
Alidi A.S.: Use of the analytic hierarchy process to measure the initial viability of industrial projects. Int. J. Project Manage.
(4), 205–208 (1996)
Virginia D.J., Tabucannon M.T.: Multi-objective models for selection of priority areas and industrial projects for investment promotion. Eng. Costs Prod. Econ.
10, 173–184 (1986)
Tabucanon, M.T.: A model for identifying areas for industrial investment priorities for the board of investments. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Systems Modeling in Developing Countries, May 8–11, AIT-Bangkok (1978)
Lai V., Wong B.K., Cheung W.: Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: a case using the AHP in the software selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
(1), 134–144 (2002)
Shang J. et al.: A unified framework for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
(85), 297–315 (1995)
Archer N.P., Ghasemzadeh F.: An integrated framework for project portfolio selection. Int. J. Project Manage.
(4), 207–216 (2002)
Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Elhag, Taha M.: An integrated AHP–DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. Comput. Ind. Eng.
54(3), 513–525 (2007)
Weiwu W., Jun K.: Highway transportation comprehensive evaluation. Comput. Ind. Eng.
(2), 257–259 (1994)
Chin K.S., Chiu S., Tummala V.M.R.: An evaluation of success factors using AHP to implement ISO 14001 based EMS. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage.
(4), 341–361 (1998)
Agha S.R.: Evaluating and benchmarking non-governmental training programs: an analytic hierarchy approach. Jordan J. Mech. Ind. Eng.
2(2), 77–84 (2008)
Andijani A.: A multi-criterion approach to kanban allocations. Omega
(26), 483–493 (1998)
Kwak N.K., Changwon L.: A multi-criteria decision making approach to university resource allocations and information infrastructure. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
(110), 234–242 (1998)
Ramanathan R., Ganesh L.: Using AHP for resource allocation problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
(4), 410–417 (1995)
Ulengin F., Ulengin B.: Forecasting foreign exchange rates: a comparative evaluation of AHP. Omega
(5), 505–519 (1994)
Korpela J., Tuominen M.: Inventory forecasting with a multiple criteria decision tool. Int. J. Prod. Econ.
(3), 159–168 (1997)
Saaty T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
Expert Choice Inc.; Expert Choice, Expert Choice Software and Manual. 4922 Ellsworth Ave., Pittsburgh (2004)
Saaty T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci.
(1), 83–98 (2008)
MathSciNet Copyright information
© King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals 2012