Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Sparfloxacin Distribution by Mass Spectrometry Imaging in a Phototoxicity Model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) was applied to samples from mouse skin and from a human in vitro 3D skin model in order to assess its suitability in the context of photosafety evaluation. MSI proved to be a suitable method for the detection of the model compound sparfloxacin in biological tissues following systemic administration (oral gavage, 100 mg/kg) and subsequent exposure to simulated sunlight. In the human in vitro 3D skin model, a concentration-dependent increase as well as an irradiation-dependent decrease of sparfloxacin was observed. The MSI data on samples from mouse skin showed high signals of sparfloxacin 8 h after dosing. In contrast, animals irradiated with simulated sunlight showed significantly lower signals for sparfloxacin starting already at 1 h postirradiation, with no measurable intensity at the later time points (3 h and 6 h), suggesting a time- and irradiation-dependent degradation of sparfloxacin. The acquisition resolution of 100 μm proved to be adequate for the visualization of the distribution of sparfloxacin in the gross ear tissue samples, but distinct skin compartments were unable to be resolved. The label-free detection of intact sparfloxacin was only the first step in an attempt to gain a deeper understanding of the phototoxic processes. Further work is needed to identify the degradation products of sparfloxacin implicated in the observed inflammatory processes in order to better understand the origin and the mechanism of the phototoxic reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drucker, A.M., Rosen, C.F.: Drug-induced photosensitivity. Drug Saf. 34, 821–837 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferguson, J.: Photosensitivity due to drugs. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 18, 262–269 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore, E.M.: Drug-induced cutaneous photosensitivity. Drug Saf. 25, 345–372 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caprioli, R.M., Farmer, T.B., Gile, J.: Molecular imaging of biological samples: localization of peptides and proteins using MALDI-TOF MS. Anal. Chem. 69, 4751–4760 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stoeckli, M., Staab, D., Schweitzer, A.: Imaging of a beta-peptide distribution in whole-body mice sections by MALDI mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 260, 195–202 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rohner, T.C., Staab, D., Stoeckli, M.: MALDI mass spectrometric imaging of biological tissue sections. Mech. Ageing Dev. 126, 177–185 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Trim, P.J., Henson, C.M., Avery, J.L., McEwan, A., Snel, M.F., Claude, E., Marshall, P.S., West, A., Princivalle, A.P., Clench, M.R.: Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-ion mobility separation-mass spectrometry imaging of vinblastine in whole body tissue sections. Anal. Chem. 80, 8628–8634 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Prideaux, B., Dartois, V., Staab, D., Weiner, D.M., Goh, A., Via, L.E., Barry III, C.E., Stoeckli, M.: High-sensitivity MALDI-MRM-MS imaging of moxifloxacin distribution in tuberculosis-infected rabbit lungs and granulomatous lesions. Anal. Chem. 83(6), 2112–2118 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pierfitte, C., Royer, R.J., Moore, N., Bégaud, B.: The link between sunshine and phototoxicity of sparfloxacin. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 49(6), 609–612 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Engler, M., Rüsing, G., Sörgel, F., Holzgrabe, U.: Defluorinated sparfloxacin as a new photoproduct identified by liquid chromatography coupled with UV detection and tandem mass spectrometry. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42(5), 1151–1159 (1998)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hubicka, U., Żuromska-Witek, B., Żmudzki, P., Maślanka, A., Kwapińska, N., Krzek, J.: Determination of sparfloxacin and its photodegradation products by thin-layer chromatography with densitometry detection. Kinetic evaluation of the degradation process and identification of photoproduct by mass spectrometry. Anal. Methods 5, 6734–6740 (2013)

  12. Ackermann, K., Lombardi Borgia, S., Korting, H.C., Mewes, K.R., Schäfer-Korting, M.: The Phenion full-thickness skin model for percutaneous absorption testing. Skin Pharmacol. Physiol. 23, 105–112 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boudon, S.M., Plappert, U., Odermatt, A., Bauer, D.: Characterization of vemurafenib phototoxicity in a mouse model. Toxicol. Sci. 137(1), 259–267 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schümann, J., Boudon, S., Loll, N., Garcia, D., Schaffner, R., Streich, J., Ulrich, P., Kittel, B., Bauer, D.: Integrated preclinical photosafety testing strategy for systemically applied pharmaceuticals. Toxicol. Sci. 139(1), 245–256 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Martin Schneider and Dr. Ulla Plappert-Helbig for their expertise and support with the animal experiments; Dr. Hans-Joerg Martus and Dr. Willi Suter for their scientific support (all Novartis Pharma AG).

This work was supported by Novartis Institute for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Switzerland. The authors are grateful for the support by COST action BM1104.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Bauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boudon, S.M., Morandi, G., Prideaux, B. et al. Evaluation of Sparfloxacin Distribution by Mass Spectrometry Imaging in a Phototoxicity Model. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 25, 1803–1809 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-014-0947-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-014-0947-3

Key words

Navigation