Skip to main content
Log in

Output-only de-tuning assessment of tuned mass dampers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, an algorithm to assess the de-tuning of tuned mass dampers (TMD) while in operation is proposed. De-tuning of such smart structures occurs due to several reasons such as accidental changes in operating conditions or deterioration of the current modal properties which leads to significant loss of its performances. An accurate assessment of its de-tuning is needed to replace or re-tune TMDs. In the present work, a class of performance measures (PM) that are primary indicators of detuning is identified through an extensive parametric study followed by a regression model in which the PMs are regressed with the level of de-tuning. Principal component regression analysis is employed to eliminate co-linearity of the PM’s, in which the PMs are de-correlated through rotational transformation and a probabilistic de-tuning model is developed. Such regression model is extremely useful in detecting the detuning using the selected PMs based on the measurement alone. Experimental studies with the proposed algorithm on a laboratory set-up show promising results which makes it a potential candidate in structural health monitoring applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abe M, Fujino Y (1994) Dynamic characterization of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 23:813–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Belouchrani A, Abed-Meraim K, Cardoso J, Moulines E (1997) A blind source separation technique using second-order statistics. IEEE Trans Signal Process 45(2):434–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen G, Wu J (2003) Experimental study on multiple tuned mass dampers to reduce seismic responses of a three-storey building structure. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(5):793–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DenHartog J (1956) Mechanical vibration. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gamble S (2009) RWDI. private communication. RWDI

  6. Gerges R, Vickery B (2005) Optimum design of pendulum-type tuned mass dampers. Struct Des Tall Special Build 14(4):353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hazra B, Narasimhan S (2010) Wavelet-based blind identification of the UCLA factor building using ambient and earthquake responses. Smart Mater Struct 19(2). doi:10.1088/09641726/19/2/025005

  8. Hazra B, Sadhu A, Roffel AJ, Paquet PE, Narasimhan S (2011) Under-determined blind identification of structure using the modified cross-correlation method. J Eng Mech ASCE. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000328

  9. Hazra B, Roffel AJ, Narasimhan S, Pandey MD (2010) Modified cross-correlation method for the blind identification of structures. J Eng Mech ASCE 136(7):889–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hazra B, Sadhu A, Lourenco R, Narasimhan S (2010) Retuning tuned mass dampers using ambient vibration response. Smart Mater Struct 19(11):13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hazra B, Sadhu A, Roffel AJ, Narasimhan S (2011) Hybrid time-frequency blind source separation towards ambient system identification of structures. Comput Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8667.2011.00732.x

  12. Hoang N, Warnitchai P (2004) Design of multiple tuned mass dampers by using a numerical optimizer. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(2):125–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang N et al (1998) The empirical mode decomposition for the hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc Lond Ser 454:903–995

    Google Scholar 

  14. James G, Carne T, Lauffer J (1995) The natural excitation technique (net) for modal parameter extraction from operating structures. Modal Anal 10:260–277

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kareem A, Kijewski T (1999) Mitigation of motions of tall buildings with specific examples of recent applications. Wind Struct 2(3):201–251

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kareem A, Kline S (1995) Performance of multiple mass dampers under random loading. J Struct Eng 121(2):348–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kela L, Vahaoja P (2009) Recent studies of adaptive tuned vibration absorbers/neutralizers. Appl Mech Rev 62(6):060801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kerschen G, Poncelet F, Golinval J (2007) Physical interpretation of independent component analysis in structural dynamics. Mech Syst Signal Process 21:1561–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kwok KCS, Samali B (1995) Performance of tuned mass dampers under wind loads. Eng Struct 17(9):655–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin CC, Hu CM, Wang JF, Hu RY (1994) Vibration control effectiveness of passive tuned mass dampers. J Chin Inst Eng 17:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin CC, Wang JF, Ueng J (2001) Vibration control identification of seismically excited m.d.o.f. structure-ptmd systems. J Sound Vib 240(1):87–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lott WF (1973) The optimal set of principal component restrictions on a least squares regression. Commun Stat Theory Method 2:449–464

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nagarajaiah S, Varadarajan N (2005) Semi-active control of wind excited building with variable stiffness tmd using short-time Fourier transform. J Eng Struct 27:431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rana R, Soong T (1998) Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers. Eng Struct 20(3):193–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ricciardelli F, Occhiuzz A, Clemente P (2000) Semi-active tuned mass damper control strategy for wind-excited structures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 88:57–74

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rowlings JO, Pantula SG, Dickey DA (1998) Applied regression analysis: a research tool, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

  27. Setareh M, Ritchey JK, Murray TM, Koo J-H, Ahmadian M (2007) Semiactive tuned mass damper for floor vibration control. J Struct Eng 133(2):242–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Spencer BF, Nagarajaiah S (2003) State of the art of structural control. J Struct Eng ASCE 129(7):845–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Warburton GW (1982) Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 10(3):381–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang JN, Lei Y, Pan S, Huang N (2003) System identification of linear structures based on Hilbert Huang spectral analysis. Part Charact 1: normal modes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 32(9):1443–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Budhaditya Hazra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hazra, B., Sadhu, A. Output-only de-tuning assessment of tuned mass dampers. J Civil Struct Health Monit 3, 33–48 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-012-0031-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-012-0031-2

Keywords

Navigation