Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting wireless network communication in monitoring systems for steel bridges

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Federal Highway Administration requires that highway bridges in the US be inspected at least every 2 years. A research investigation at the University of Texas at Austin aims to develop a wireless data acquisition system that can be used to monitor the response of steel bridge systems in an economic manner and thereby enhance this traditional inspection process. Wireless systems feature many advantages, such as minimizing the amount of wire required and reducing installation costs. However, there are also a number of challenges associated with implementing wireless systems and the research team has previously experienced communication difficulties when using wireless data acquisition systems to monitor steel highway bridges. Radio frequency (RF) studies were conducted to determine if wireless networks using IEEE 802.15.4 radios provide reliable communication in steel bridge environments. Measurements were also taken to determine the impact on the network performances using four types of antennas. While improvements in network performance were observed using high-gain antennas in an open field, the performance improvements were inconsistent when used on steel bridges and therefore their use is not recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. USDOT. (2004) Status of the nation’s highways, bridges, and transit: conditions and performance. Retrieved from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2004cpr/

  2. Lynch J, Sundararajan A, Law K, Kiremidjian A, Carryer E (2004) Embedding damage detection algorithms in a wireless sensing unit for operation power efficiency. Smart Mater Struct 13(4):800–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lynch J, Loh K (2006) A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock Vibration Digest 38(2):91–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Whelan M, Gangone M, Janoyan K, Jha R (2009) Real-time wireless vibration monitoring for operational modal analysis of an integral abutment highway bridge. Eng Struct 31(10):2224–2235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Linderman L, Rice J, Barot S, Spencer B Jr, Bernhard J (2010) Characterization of wireless smart sensor performance. Eng Mech 136(12):1435–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Helwig T, Herman R, Li D (2004) Behavior of trapezoidal box girders with skewed supports. Research Report 4148-1, University of Houston, Report for Texas Department of Transportation

  7. Kim J, Swartz A, Lynch J, Lee J, Lee C (2010) Rapid-to-deploy reconfigurable wireless structural monitoring systems using extended-range wireless sensors. Smart Struct Syst 6(5–6):505–524

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ozdemir T, Goykhman Y, Oberdier L, Lynch J (2010) Smart antenna technology for structural health monitoring applications. Proceedings of SPIE, vol 7649

  9. Fasl J, Helwig T, Wood S, Potter D, Samaras V, Frank K (2009) Development of rapid, reliable, and economical methods for inspection and monitoring of fracture-critical steel bridges. World Steel Bridge Symposium, National Steel Bridge Alliance, Conference Proceedings

  10. Goldsmith A (2005) Wireless Communications. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bennett P, Soga K, Wassell I, Fidler P, Abe K, Kobayashi Y, Vanicek M (2010) Wireless sensor networks for underground railway applications: case studies in Prague and London. Smart Struct Syst 6(5–6):619–639

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stajano F, Hoult N, Wassell I, Bennett P, Middleton C, Soga K (2010) Smart bridges, smart tunnels: transforming wireless sensor networks from research prototypes into robust engineering infrastructure. Ad Hoc Netw 8:872–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. L-com. (2011) Retrieved from http://www.l-com.com/

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research discussed in this paper is sponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Technology through the Technology Innovation Program (Award number 70NANB9H9011). The TIP project manager is Gerald Castellucci. The research project represents a joint venture among the University of Texas at Austin, National Instruments, and Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the researchers and do not necessarily represent those of the sponsor. The researchers would like to thank David Hohmann, Keith Ramsey, Robert Crowson, and Jon Kilgore from the Texas Department of Transportation for their assistance in identifying bridges to test the wireless monitoring system. In addition, Karl Frank, Vasilis Samaras, Ali Abu Yousef, Matthew Reichenbach, David Potter, and Richard Lindenberg made significant contributions to the research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremiah Fasl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fasl, J., Helwig, T., Wood, S.L. et al. Factors affecting wireless network communication in monitoring systems for steel bridges. J Civil Struct Health Monit 2, 87–95 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-012-0019-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-012-0019-y

Keywords

Navigation