Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence for diabetes mellitus criteria in 2010 using HbA1c

  • Original article
  • Published:
Diabetology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was done on the correlation of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h PG levels in an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT 2-h PG) with the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value and on the prevalence and incidence of retinopathy in order to determine diabetes mellitus diagnostic criteria using HbA1c in Japanese patients. Participants in this study were 15,191 individuals who underwent OGTT. HbA1c determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at the time of OGTT was converted by the corresponding National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (Seino et al., Diabetol Int 1:2–20, 2010). A high correlation of HbA1c value with FPG and OGTT 2-h PG was observed, and using a regression equation, HbA1c of 6.5 % was calculated to be FPG 124.3 mg/dl and OGTT 2-h PG 199.6 mg/dl, which are consistent with diabetes mellitus diagnostic criteria. The prevalence of all retinopathy was significantly elevated from HbA1c values of 6.1–6.5 %. Also evident was retinopathy excluding microaneurysm, which was elevated significantly from HbA1c values of 6.1–6.5 %. The incidence of all retinopathy was significantly elevated from HbA1c values of 6.1–6.5 %. In view of the above, it can be said that HbA1c of >6.5 % is the most appropriate criteria in Japanese for diagnosing diabetes mellitus. However, from the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve, sensitivity of diabetes mellitus was 54.3 % at HbA1c levels of 6.5 % and thus in its diagnosis, the PG level is also very important. It is therefore necessary to take into account both values in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Committee of the Japan Diabetes Society on the diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus, Seino Y, Nanjo K, Tajima N, Kadowaki T, Kashiwagi A, Araki E, Ito C, Inagaki N, Iwamoto Y, Kasuga M, Hanabusa T, Haneda K, Ueki K. Report of the Committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Int. 2010;1:2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare: 1997 Actual status survey of diabetes mellitus. 1998.

  3. Ito C, Maeda R, Ishida S, Sasaki H, Harada H. Correlation among fasting plasma glucose, two-hour plasma glucose levels in OGTT and HbA1c. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;50:225–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shima K. In: Shima K, editor. Glycohemoglobin seeing and thinking of plasma glucose. Tokyo: Nankodo; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Akazawa Y, Akanuma Y, Ikeda Y, Ito C, Kiyose H, Goto Y, Shima K. Medical examination for diabetes mellitus based on the Health and Medical Service Law for the Aged. Supervised by Ministry of Health. Tokyo: Japan Med J; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Committee of the Japan Diabetes Society on the diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus, Kuzuya T, Nakagawa S, Satoh J, Kanazawa Y, Iwamoto Y, Kobayashi M, Nanjo K, Sasaki A, Seino Y, Ito C, Shima K, Nonaka K, Kadowaki T. Report of the Committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. Japan Diabetes Soc. 1999;42:385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  8. The Committee of the Japan Diabetes Society on the diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus, Seino Y, Nanjo K, Tjima N, Kadowaki T, Kashiwagi A, Araki E, Ito C, Inagaki N, Iwamoto Y, Kasuga M, Hanabusa T, Haneda K, Ueki K. Report of the committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. Japan Diabetes Soc. 2010;53:450–67.

    Google Scholar 

  9. International Expert Committee. International committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1327–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. The expert committee on the Diagnosis and classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;30:1183–97.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ito C, Maeda R, Ishida S, Harada H, Inoue N, Sasaki H. Importance of OGTT for diagnosing diabetes mellitus based on prevalence and incidence of retinopathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;49:181–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cowie CC, Rust KF, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and high risk for diabetes using A1C criteria in the U.S. population in 1988–2006. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:562–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. The DETECT-2 Collaboration. Is there a glycemic threshold for diabetic retinopathy? Diabetologia. 2011;47:1411–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. WHO. Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: Abbreviated Report of a WHO Consultation WHO; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chikako Ito.

About this article

Cite this article

Ito, C. Evidence for diabetes mellitus criteria in 2010 using HbA1c. Diabetol Int 4, 9–15 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-012-0086-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-012-0086-7

Keywords

Navigation