Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reproducibility and validity of a satisfaction questionnaire on hypoglycemic agents: the Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire (OHA-Q)

  • Original article
  • Published:
Diabetology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to assess satisfaction with treatment using oral hypoglycemic agents among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, we developed the Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire (OHA-Q), a patient-administered questionnaire composed of 20 questions. We enrolled 597 outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had been treated with a single oral hypoglycemic agent for 1 month or longer at 45 institutions in Japan. Their physicians provided background information on the patients, etc., in the physician-filled forms, and the patients answered both OHA-Q and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) twice in 1 week. After patients with incomplete forms, etc., had been excluded, statistical analyses were performed on 483 patients for the validity assessment and on 419 patients for the reproducibility assessment. Based on factor analysis of the OHA-Q item scores, a simple structure was obtained by three-factor varimax rotation, and three subscale scores were identified as the “treatment convenience score,” “somatic symptom score” and “satisfaction score.” All intraclass correlation coefficients for the subscale scores were 0.7 or higher, showing high reproducibility. A correlation of 0.4 or higher was observed between the subscale scores and the DTSQ satisfaction score. Moreover, an expected association was observed between the subscale scores and patient background factors. Based on these results, OHA-Q may have adequate reproducibility and validity as an assessment scale for satisfaction with treatment using oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(Suppl 2):S125–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Payne R, Mathias SD, Pasta DJ, et al. Quality of life and cancer: satisfaction and side effects with transdermal fentanyl versus oral morphine. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(4):1588–93.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chatterton ML, Scott-Lennox J, Wu AW, et al. Quality of life and treatment satisfaction after the addition of lamivudine or lamivudine plus loviride to zidovudine-containing regimens in treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15(Suppl 1):67–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mathias SD, Warren EH, Colwell HH, et al. A new treatment satisfaction measure for asthmatics: a validation study. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(7):873–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson MJ, Shinha A, Hass SL, et al. Validation of a general measure of treatment satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), using a national panel study of chronic disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2:12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. The DCCT research group. Reliability and validity of a diabetes quality-of-life measure for the diabetes control and complications trial (DCCT). Diabetes Care. 1988;11(9):725–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley C. Diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire (DTSQ). In: Bradley C, editor. Handbook of psychology and diabetes. Chur: Harwood Academic Publ.; 1994.

  8. Ishii H, Bradley C, Riazi A, Barendse S, Yamamoto T. The Japanese Version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ): translation and clinical evaluation. J Clin Exp Med. 2000;192:809–14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Polonsky WH, et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care. 1995;18(6):754–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishii H, Yamamoto T, Ohashi Y. Development of insulin therapy related quality of life measure (ITR-QOL). J Japan Diabetes Soc. 2001;44:9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ishii H, Anderson JH Jr, Yamamura A, et al. Improvement of glycemic control and quality-of-life by insulin lispro therapy: assessing benefits by ITR-QOL questionnaires. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;81(2):169–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krentz AJ, Bailey CJ. Oral antidiabetic agents: current role in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 2005;65(3):385–411.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Donatti C, Wild D, Horblyuk R, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Satisfaction with Oral Anti-Diabetic Agent Scale (SOADAS). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;80(1):108–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 1999;15:205–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sampson MJ, Singh H, Dhatariya KK, et al. Psychometric validation and use of a novel diabetes in-patient treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Diabet Med. 2009;26(7):729–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Biderman A, Noff E, Harris SB, et al. Treatment satisfaction of diabetic patients: what are the contributing factors? Fam Pract. 2009;26(2):102–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eisei Oda.

Appendix: Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire (OHA-Q)

Appendix: Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire (OHA-Q)

About this article

Cite this article

Ishii, H., Oda, E. Reproducibility and validity of a satisfaction questionnaire on hypoglycemic agents: the Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire (OHA-Q). Diabetol Int 3, 152–163 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-012-0074-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-012-0074-y

Keywords

Navigation