Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of In Vitro Cytochrome P450 Inhibition and In Vitro Fate of Structurally Diverse N-Oxide Metabolites: Case Studies with Clozapine, Levofloxacin, Roflumilast, Voriconazole and Zopiclone

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objectives

The role of metabolite(s) to elicit potential clinical drug–drug interaction (DDI) via cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYP) is gaining momentum. In this context, the role of N-oxides for in vitro CYP inhibition has not been evaluated. The objectives of this study were: (a) to examine in vitro CYP inhibition of N-oxides of clozapine, levofloxacin, roflumilast, voriconazole and zopiclone in a tiered approach and (b) evaluate in vitro fate of aforementioned N-oxides examined in recombinant CYPs, human microsomes and hepatocytes.

Methods

CYP enzymes evaluated in the work included: CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4 using standard procedures for incubation with appropriate probe substrates. The initial cutoff for CYP inhibition was ≥50% using 2 and 10 µM concentrations of various N-oxide metabolites (Tier 1). IC50 values were constructed for the CYP pathway(s) that showed ≥50% inhibition (Tier 2). In addition, co-incubation of N-oxides with parent was performed to evaluate potentiation of CYP inhibition (Tier 3).

Results

N-oxides of clozapine (CYP2B6/2C19) and voriconazole (CYP2C9/3A4) showed CYP inhibition ≥50%. Clozapine-N-oxide inhibited CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 pathways with IC50 of 8.3 and 8.7 µM, respectively. Voriconazole-N-oxide inhibited CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 pathways with IC50 of 10.5 and 11.2 µM, respectively. Co-incubation of clozapine-N-oxide with clozapine potentiated CYP2B6/2C19 pathways; however, incubation of voriconazole-N-oxide with voriconazole did not appear to potentiate the CYP pathways because parent caused an inhibition of almost 80%. None of the N-oxides appeared to further undergo biotransformation as judged by the in vitro metabolic fate experiments (stage 2).

Conclusions

Clinical DDI potential of specific CYP enzymes needs to be considered arising due to circulatory concentrations of certain N-oxides depending on the dose size and/or frequency of dosing of the respective parent drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Srinivas NR. Pharmacokinetic interaction of rifampicin with oral versus intravenous anticancer drugs: challenges, dilemmas and paradoxical effects due to multiple mechanisms. Drugs R D. 2016;16:141–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Polepally AR, King JR, Ding B, et al. Drug-drug interactions between the anti-hepatitis C virus 3D regimen of ombitasvir, paritaprevir/ritonavir, and dasabuvir and eight commonly used medications in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:1003–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cannady EA, Wang MD, Friedrich S, et al. Evacetrapib: in vitro and clinical disposition, metabolism, excretion, and assessment of drug interaction potential with strong CYP3A and CYP2C8 inhibitors. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015;3:e00179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Marsousi N, Daali Y, Rudaz S, et al. Prediction of metabolic interactions with oxycodone via CYP2D6 and CYP3A inhibition using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. CPT Pharmacomet Syst Pharmacol. 2014;17:e152.

  5. Srinivas NR, Mullangi R. Bioanalysis in oncology drug discovery. Biomark Med. 2013;9:877–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalgutkar AS, Tugnait M, Zhu T, et al. Preclinical species and human disposition of PF-04971729, a selective inhibitor of the sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 2 and clinical candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011;39:1609–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nettleton DO, Einolf HJ. Assessment of cytochrome p450 enzyme inhibition and inactivation in drug discovery and development. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011;11:382–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sager JE, Lutz JD, Foti RS, Davis C, et al. Fluoxetine- and norfluoxetine-mediated complex drug-drug interactions: in vitro to in vivo correlation of effects on CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95:653–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho DY, Bae SH, Lee JK, et al. Selective inhibition of cytochrome P450 2D6 by Sarpogrelate and its active metabolite, M-1, in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42:33–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gan J, Liu-Kreyche P, Humphreys WG. In vitro assessment of cytochrome P450 inhibition and induction potential of tanespimycin and its major metabolite, 17-amino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012;69:51–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Narimatsu S, Arai T, Masubuchi Y, et al. Inactivation of rat cytochrome P450 2D enzyme by a further metabolite of 4-hydroxypropranolol, the major and active metabolite of propranolol. Biol Pharm Bull. 2001;24:988–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones DR, Kim SY, Guderyon M, et al. Hydroxywarfarin metabolites potently inhibit CYP2C9 metabolism of S-warfarin. Chem Res Toxicol. 2010;17:939–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eng H, Obach RS. Use of human plasma samples to identify circulating drug metabolites that inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2016;44:1217–12528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hohmann N, Kocheise F, Carls A, Burhenne J, Weiss J, Haefeli WE, Mikus G. Dose-dependent bioavailability and CYP3A inhibition contribute to non-linear pharmacokinetics of voriconazole. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016 May 28. [Epub ahead of print].

  15. Hemeryck A, Mamidi RNVS, Bottacini M, et al. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, excretion and plasma protein binding of 14C-levofloxacin after a single oral administration in the Rhesus monkey. Xenobiotica. 2006;36:597–613.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Quinsair (levofloxacin). EMA/CHMP/676680/2014, Corr 1. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/human/002789/WC500187847.pdf. Accessed 15th Oct 2016.

  17. Aravagiri M, Marder SR. Simultaneous determination of clozapine and its N-desmethyl and N-oxide metabolites in plasma by liquid chromatography/electrospray tandem mass spectrometry and its application to plasma level monitoring in schizophrenic patients. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2001;26:301–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clozaril (clozapine) tablets review report. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Japan. 2009. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000153638.pdf. Last accessed 15th Oct 2016.

  19. Estorra (eszopiclone). Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), 2004. Pharmacology review, Application number: NDA 21-476. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2004/021476_Lunesta_pharmr.PDF. Last accessed 15th Oct 2016.

  20. Mistri HN, Jangid AG, Pudage A. HPLC-ESI-MS/MS validated method for simultaneous quantification of zopiclone and its metabolites, N-desmethyl zopiclone and zopiclone-N-oxide in human plasma. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2008;864:137–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Niwa T, Shiraga T, Takagi A. Effect of antifungal drugs on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 activities in human liver microsomes. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28:1805–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roffey SJ, Cole S, Comby P, et al. The disposition of voriconazole in mouse, rat, rabbit, guinea pig, dog, and human. DMD. 2003;31:731–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Roflumilast 500 mcg tablets. Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Pharmacology review. 2011; Applicationnumber:NDA 22-522. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2011/022522Orig1s000PharmR.pdf. Accessed 15th Oct 2016.

  24. Roffey SJ, Cole S, Comby P, Gibson D, Jezequel SG, Nedderman AN, Smith DA, Walker DK, Wood N. The disposition of voriconazole in mouse, rat, rabbit, guinea pig, dog, and human. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003;31(6):731–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. CLOZARIL® (clozapine) Tablets. Prescribing information. Novartis Pharmaceuticals, NJ, USA. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/019758s062lbl.pdf. Accessed 15th Oct 2016.

  26. Chen ZH, Zhang SX, Long N, et al. An improved substrate cocktail for assessing direct inhibition and time-dependent inhibition of multiple cytochrome P450s. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2016;37:708–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Borkar M R, Bhandi M M, Dubey P A, e al. An Evaluation of the CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 inhibition potential of metoprolol metabolites and their contribution to drug–drug and drug-herb interaction by LC-ESI/MS/MS. Biomed Chromatogr. 2016;30:1556–72.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuggehally R. Srinivas.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No external source of funding were used to conduct this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors are employees of Cadila Health Care Ltd. (Ahmedabad, India) and declare no competing interests or conflicts in the contents of the reported (ZRC publication no. 484).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giri, P., Naidu, S., Patel, N. et al. Evaluation of In Vitro Cytochrome P450 Inhibition and In Vitro Fate of Structurally Diverse N-Oxide Metabolites: Case Studies with Clozapine, Levofloxacin, Roflumilast, Voriconazole and Zopiclone. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 42, 677–688 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-016-0385-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-016-0385-7

Keywords

Navigation