Abstract
Host genotype × environment (GE) interaction is a commonly observed phenomenon in experiments in plant pathology and can be analysed using different statistical models which can include parametric or nonparametric methods. Using data based on ordinal scales (commonly used to measure disease in plant pathology) or continuous scales, the disease responses of host genotypes across environments and resulting GE interactions have been analysed using 26 different nonparametric methods. An analysis of two datasets for severity of gray leaf spot of maize (10 northern or southern adapted genotypes planted at 10 or 11 locations in the US, respectively) revealed differences among host genotypes, environments and the GE interactions. A factor analysis was performed on the rank correlation matrix arising from the application of each nonparametric method. The 26 methods can be categorized, for both sets of experimental data, in two major groups: (i) those which are mostly associated with level of disease severity and show little or no correlation with the static type of stability concept, and (ii) those in which both level of disease severity and stability of performance are considered simultaneously to reduce the effect of the GE interaction. This analysis separated nonparametric methods based on a dynamic concept of stability from those which are based on the static type of stability. Comparison of original and corrected nonparametric statistics indicated that, the identification of the most resistant cultivar for a specific environment based on both genotype and GE interaction would be useful to plant pathologists since estimates based only on genotype and environment effects are insufficient. Following measures based on corrected Ketata’s rank, original Ketata’s rank, Fox’s statistic and rank-sum, the NP2 statistic of Thennarasu (average of summation of absolute values of adjusted ranks from the median) was found to be useful in detecting the phenotypic stability of disease severity in a dataset. Nonparametric methods can be useful alternatives to parametric methods and allow valid conclusions to be drawn while assessing the GE interaction in experiments undertaken in plant pathology or plant breeding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akritas MG (1990) The rank transform method in some two-factor designs. J Am Stat Assoc 85:73–78
Azzalini A, Cox DR (1984) Two new tests associated with analysis of variance. J Royal Statis Soc 46:335–343
Becker HC, Leon J (1988) Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed 101:1–23
Bock CH, Poole G, Parker PE, Gottwald TR (2010a) Plant disease severity estimated visually, by digital photography and image analysis, and by hyperspectral imaging. Crit Rev Plant Sci 29:59–107
Bock CH, Gottwald TR, Parker PE, Ferrandino F, Welham S, van den Bosch F, Parnell S (2010b) Some consequences of using the Horsfall-Barratt scale for hypothesis testing. Phytopathology 100:1031–1041
Bredenkamp J (1974) Non-parametriche prufung von wechsewirkungen. Psycholo Beit 16:398–416
Carson ML, Goodman MM (2006) Pathogenicity, aggressiveness, and virulence of three species of Cercospora associated with gray leaf spot of maize. Maydica 51:89–92
Ceccarelli S, Grando S (2007) Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: an example of demand driven research. Euphytica 155:349–360
Chiang KS, Liu SH, Bock CH, Gottwald TR (2014) What interval characteristics make a good disease assessment category scale? Phytopathology 104:575–585
Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics. 3rd ed. 584 pages. Wiley, New York
de Kroon J, van der Laan P (1981) Distribution-free test procedures in two-way layouts: a concept of rank-interaction. Statis Neerl 35:189–213
Ebadi-Segherloo A, Sabaghpour SH, Dehghani H, Kamrani M (2008) Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability in chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 2:221–229
Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40
Eskridge KM (1995) Statistical analysis of disease reaction data using nonparametric methods. HortSci 30:478–480
Flores F, Moreno MT, Cubero JI (1998) A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze environments. Field Crop Res 56:271–286
Fox PN, Skovmand B, Thompson BK, Braun HJ, Cormier R (1990) Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica 47:57–64
Gauch HG, Piepho HP, Annicchiarico P (2008) Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: further considerations. Crop Sci 48:866–889
Haynes KG, Lambert DH, Christ BJ, Weingartner DP, Douches DS, Backhmd JE, Secor G, Fry W, Stevenson W (1998) Phenotypic stability of resistance to late blight in potato clones evaluated at eight sites in the United States. Amer J of Potato Res 75:211–217
Hildebrand H (1980) Asymptotosch verteilungsfreie rangtests in linearen modellen. Medizin Infor Statis 17:344–349
Huehn M (1979) Beitrage zur erfassung der phanotypischen stabilitat. EDV Med Biol 10:112–117
Huehn M (1990a) Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability: part 1. Theory Euphytica 47:189–194
Huehn M (1990b) Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability: part 2. Application Euphytica 47:195–201
Huehn M (1996) Non-parametric analysis of genotype × environment interactions by ranks. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG (eds) Genotype by environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 213–228
Huehn M, Leon J (1995) Non-parametric analysis of cultivar performance trials: experimental results and comparison of different procedures based on ranks. Agron J 87:627–632
Huehn M, Nassar R (1989) On tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 45:997–1000
Hussein MA, Bjornstad A, Aastveit AH (2000) SASG ×ESTAB: a SAS program for computing genotype × environment stability statistics. Agron J 92:454–459
Kang M (1988) A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Res Commun 16:113–115
Kang M, Pham HN (1991) Simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Agron J 83:161–163
Ketata H, Yan SK, Nachit M. (1989) Relative consistency performance across environments. Int. Symp. on Physiology and breeding of winter cereals for stressed mediterranean environments. Montpellier, July 3–6, 1989
Kubinger KD (1986) A note on non-parametric tests for the interaction on two-way layouts. Biomet J 28:67–72
Lipps PE, Madden LV (1989) Assessment of methods of determining powdery mildew severity in relation to grain yield of winter wheat cultivars in Ohio. Phytopath 79:462–470
Lu HY (1995) PC-SAS program for estimation Huehn’s nonparametric stability statistics. Agron J 87:888–891
Madden LV, Paul PA, Lipps PE (2007) Consideration of nonparametric approaches for assessing genotype-by-environment (G × E) interaction with disease severity data. Plant Dis 91:891–900
Nassar R, Huehn M (1987) Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: test of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 43:45–53
Paul PA, Munkvold GP (2004) A model-based approach to preplanting risk assessment for gray leaf spot of maize. Phytopathol 94:1350–1357
Piepho HP (1997) Distribution-free tests for one-way homoscedasticity in a two-way classification. Biometrics 53:340–351
Piepho HP, Lotito S (1992) Rank correlation among parametric and nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica 64:221–225
Sabaghnia N (2015) Identification of the most stable genotypes in multi-environment trials by using nonparametric methods. Acta Agric Sloven 105:103–110
Sabaghnia N, Janmohammadi M (2015) A comparison of nonparametric methods to analyze genotype by environment interaction. Agric Fores 61:169–175
Sabaghnia N, Dehghani H, Sbaghpour H (2006) Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype · environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Sci 46:1100–1106
Sabaghnia N, Karimizadeh R, Mohammadi M (2012) The use of corrected and uncorrected nonparametric stability measurements in durum wheat multi-environmental trials. Span J Agric Res 10:722–730
Sabaghnia N, Mohammadi M, Karimizadeh R (2013) Interpreting genotype × environment interaction of beard wheat genotypes using different nonparametric stability statistics. Agric Fores 59:21–35
Sabaghnia N, Karimizadeh R, Mohammadi M (2014) Graphic analysis of yield stability in new improved lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) genotypes using nonparametric statistics. Acta Agric Slov 103:113–127
Shah DA, Madden LV (2004) Nonparametric analysis of ordinal data in designed factorial experiments. Phytopath 94:33–43
Shukla GK (1972) Some aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 28:237–245
Thennarasu K (1995) On certain non-parametric procedures for studying genotype–environment interactions and yield stability. Ph.D. thesis. P.J. School, IARI, New Delhi
Turechek WW (2004) Nonparametric tests in plant disease epidemiology: characterizing disease associations. Phytopathology 94:1018–1021
Yan W, Falk DE (2002) Biplot analysis of host-by-pathogen interaction. Plant Dis 86:1396–1401
Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci 40:597–605
Acknowledgments
I express my thanks to Professor Laurence (Larry) V. Madden, Acting Chair and Distinguished Professor in Plant Protection, Epidemiology, Statistics, and Biomathematics, of Ohio State University for kindly providing the gray leaf spot data. The author also thanks the anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor of Australasian Plant Pathology journal for their helpful comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sabaghnia, N. Nonparametric statistical methods for analysis of genotype × environment interactions in plant pathology. Australasian Plant Pathol. 45, 571–580 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-016-0453-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-016-0453-0