Skip to main content
Log in

Nonparametric statistical methods for analysis of genotype × environment interactions in plant pathology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Host genotype × environment (GE) interaction is a commonly observed phenomenon in experiments in plant pathology and can be analysed using different statistical models which can include parametric or nonparametric methods. Using data based on ordinal scales (commonly used to measure disease in plant pathology) or continuous scales, the disease responses of host genotypes across environments and resulting GE interactions have been analysed using 26 different nonparametric methods. An analysis of two datasets for severity of gray leaf spot of maize (10 northern or southern adapted genotypes planted at 10 or 11 locations in the US, respectively) revealed differences among host genotypes, environments and the GE interactions. A factor analysis was performed on the rank correlation matrix arising from the application of each nonparametric method. The 26 methods can be categorized, for both sets of experimental data, in two major groups: (i) those which are mostly associated with level of disease severity and show little or no correlation with the static type of stability concept, and (ii) those in which both level of disease severity and stability of performance are considered simultaneously to reduce the effect of the GE interaction. This analysis separated nonparametric methods based on a dynamic concept of stability from those which are based on the static type of stability. Comparison of original and corrected nonparametric statistics indicated that, the identification of the most resistant cultivar for a specific environment based on both genotype and GE interaction would be useful to plant pathologists since estimates based only on genotype and environment effects are insufficient. Following measures based on corrected Ketata’s rank, original Ketata’s rank, Fox’s statistic and rank-sum, the NP2 statistic of Thennarasu (average of summation of absolute values of adjusted ranks from the median) was found to be useful in detecting the phenotypic stability of disease severity in a dataset. Nonparametric methods can be useful alternatives to parametric methods and allow valid conclusions to be drawn while assessing the GE interaction in experiments undertaken in plant pathology or plant breeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akritas MG (1990) The rank transform method in some two-factor designs. J Am Stat Assoc 85:73–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azzalini A, Cox DR (1984) Two new tests associated with analysis of variance. J Royal Statis Soc 46:335–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker HC, Leon J (1988) Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed 101:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock CH, Poole G, Parker PE, Gottwald TR (2010a) Plant disease severity estimated visually, by digital photography and image analysis, and by hyperspectral imaging. Crit Rev Plant Sci 29:59–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock CH, Gottwald TR, Parker PE, Ferrandino F, Welham S, van den Bosch F, Parnell S (2010b) Some consequences of using the Horsfall-Barratt scale for hypothesis testing. Phytopathology 100:1031–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bredenkamp J (1974) Non-parametriche prufung von wechsewirkungen. Psycholo Beit 16:398–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson ML, Goodman MM (2006) Pathogenicity, aggressiveness, and virulence of three species of Cercospora associated with gray leaf spot of maize. Maydica 51:89–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli S, Grando S (2007) Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: an example of demand driven research. Euphytica 155:349–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang KS, Liu SH, Bock CH, Gottwald TR (2014) What interval characteristics make a good disease assessment category scale? Phytopathology 104:575–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conover WJ (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics. 3rd ed. 584 pages. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kroon J, van der Laan P (1981) Distribution-free test procedures in two-way layouts: a concept of rank-interaction. Statis Neerl 35:189–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebadi-Segherloo A, Sabaghpour SH, Dehghani H, Kamrani M (2008) Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability in chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica 2:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskridge KM (1995) Statistical analysis of disease reaction data using nonparametric methods. HortSci 30:478–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores F, Moreno MT, Cubero JI (1998) A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze environments. Field Crop Res 56:271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox PN, Skovmand B, Thompson BK, Braun HJ, Cormier R (1990) Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica 47:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG, Piepho HP, Annicchiarico P (2008) Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE: further considerations. Crop Sci 48:866–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes KG, Lambert DH, Christ BJ, Weingartner DP, Douches DS, Backhmd JE, Secor G, Fry W, Stevenson W (1998) Phenotypic stability of resistance to late blight in potato clones evaluated at eight sites in the United States. Amer J of Potato Res 75:211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand H (1980) Asymptotosch verteilungsfreie rangtests in linearen modellen. Medizin Infor Statis 17:344–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huehn M (1979) Beitrage zur erfassung der phanotypischen stabilitat. EDV Med Biol 10:112–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Huehn M (1990a) Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability: part 1. Theory Euphytica 47:189–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Huehn M (1990b) Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability: part 2. Application Euphytica 47:195–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Huehn M (1996) Non-parametric analysis of genotype × environment interactions by ranks. In: Kang MS, Gauch HG (eds) Genotype by environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Huehn M, Leon J (1995) Non-parametric analysis of cultivar performance trials: experimental results and comparison of different procedures based on ranks. Agron J 87:627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huehn M, Nassar R (1989) On tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 45:997–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein MA, Bjornstad A, Aastveit AH (2000) SASG ×ESTAB: a SAS program for computing genotype × environment stability statistics. Agron J 92:454–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang M (1988) A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Res Commun 16:113–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang M, Pham HN (1991) Simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Agron J 83:161–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketata H, Yan SK, Nachit M. (1989) Relative consistency performance across environments. Int. Symp. on Physiology and breeding of winter cereals for stressed mediterranean environments. Montpellier, July 3–6, 1989

  • Kubinger KD (1986) A note on non-parametric tests for the interaction on two-way layouts. Biomet J 28:67–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipps PE, Madden LV (1989) Assessment of methods of determining powdery mildew severity in relation to grain yield of winter wheat cultivars in Ohio. Phytopath 79:462–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu HY (1995) PC-SAS program for estimation Huehn’s nonparametric stability statistics. Agron J 87:888–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden LV, Paul PA, Lipps PE (2007) Consideration of nonparametric approaches for assessing genotype-by-environment (G × E) interaction with disease severity data. Plant Dis 91:891–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassar R, Huehn M (1987) Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: test of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 43:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul PA, Munkvold GP (2004) A model-based approach to preplanting risk assessment for gray leaf spot of maize. Phytopathol 94:1350–1357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP (1997) Distribution-free tests for one-way homoscedasticity in a two-way classification. Biometrics 53:340–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piepho HP, Lotito S (1992) Rank correlation among parametric and nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica 64:221–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaghnia N (2015) Identification of the most stable genotypes in multi-environment trials by using nonparametric methods. Acta Agric Sloven 105:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaghnia N, Janmohammadi M (2015) A comparison of nonparametric methods to analyze genotype by environment interaction. Agric Fores 61:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabaghnia N, Dehghani H, Sbaghpour H (2006) Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype · environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Sci 46:1100–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaghnia N, Karimizadeh R, Mohammadi M (2012) The use of corrected and uncorrected nonparametric stability measurements in durum wheat multi-environmental trials. Span J Agric Res 10:722–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabaghnia N, Mohammadi M, Karimizadeh R (2013) Interpreting genotype × environment interaction of beard wheat genotypes using different nonparametric stability statistics. Agric Fores 59:21–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabaghnia N, Karimizadeh R, Mohammadi M (2014) Graphic analysis of yield stability in new improved lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) genotypes using nonparametric statistics. Acta Agric Slov 103:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah DA, Madden LV (2004) Nonparametric analysis of ordinal data in designed factorial experiments. Phytopath 94:33–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla GK (1972) Some aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 28:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thennarasu K (1995) On certain non-parametric procedures for studying genotype–environment interactions and yield stability. Ph.D. thesis. P.J. School, IARI, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Turechek WW (2004) Nonparametric tests in plant disease epidemiology: characterizing disease associations. Phytopathology 94:1018–1021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Falk DE (2002) Biplot analysis of host-by-pathogen interaction. Plant Dis 86:1396–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci 40:597–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I express my thanks to Professor Laurence (Larry) V. Madden, Acting Chair and Distinguished Professor in Plant Protection, Epidemiology, Statistics, and Biomathematics, of Ohio State University for kindly providing the gray leaf spot data. The author also thanks the anonymous reviewers and the Associate Editor of Australasian Plant Pathology journal for their helpful comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naser Sabaghnia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabaghnia, N. Nonparametric statistical methods for analysis of genotype × environment interactions in plant pathology. Australasian Plant Pathol. 45, 571–580 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-016-0453-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-016-0453-0

Keywords

Navigation