Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Factors affecting Neofusicoccum luteum infection and disease progression in grapevines

  • Published:
Australasian Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated some factors that affect Neofusicoccum luteum infection and disease progression in grapevines, on which it causes cankers and die-back. Inoculation of green shoots with each of the conidial suspensions (20 μL of 102–106 conidia/mL) caused 100 % infection, but significant differences in lesion lengths among concentrations (P < 0.001). Lesion lengths increased with conidial concentrations to a maximum of 41.7 mm, in tissue inoculated with 104/conidial. Lesions then decreased for 105 and 106 conidial/mL (28.6 and 27.8 mm, respectively). The different wetness durations (0–24 h) tested after inoculating trunks of 1-year old vines with conidia did not affect pathogen incidence or lesion lengths, however continued incubation at 95 % RH caused greater pathogen progression (maximum isolation distances from point of inoculation; P < 0.001; 100.6 mm) than at ambient 78 % RH (77.0 mm) within 3 months after inoculation. Inoculation of trunks, canes and green shoots caused different rates of pathogen colonisation (P < 0.001); by 5 months after N. luteum inoculation mean maximum distances were 39.1, 31.6 and 23.2 mm, respectively. Wound age at the time of inoculation significantly affected (P < 0.001) infection incidence by N. luteum, which decreased as wounds aged. Conidial inoculum caused 100-0 % incidence over 0–14 days and mycelial inoculum caused 100-40 % infection over 0–30 days. Soil moistures affected lesion development, with 15 and 100 % soil moisture causing greatest dieback and bud death during winter. This study has shown how some features of the natural infection environment can affect infection by Botryosphaeria spp. inoculum and symptom development, which could underpin improvements in vineyard management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amponsah NT, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2008) Production of Botryosphaeria species conidia using grapevine green shoots. N Z Plant Protect 61:301–305

  • Amponsah NT, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2009) Rainwater dispersal of Botryosphaeria conidia from infected grapevines. N Z Plant Protect 62:228–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Amponsah NT, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2010) Effects of solar radiation and relative humidity on germination of Botryosphaeriaceae species conidia. N Z Plant Protect 63:28–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Amponsah NT, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2011) Identification, potential inoculum sources and pathogenicity of botryosphaeriaceous species associated with grapevine dieback disease in New Zealand. Eur Plant Pathol 131:467–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amponsah NT, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ (2012) Jaspers MV (2012) susceptibility of grapevine tissues to Neofusicoccum luteum conidial infection. Plant Pathol 61(4):719–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arauz LF, Sutton TB (1989) Influence of temperature and moisture on germination of ascospores and conidia of Botryosphaeria obtusa. Phytopathology 79:667–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagga DK, Smalley EB (1969) Factors affecting canker development on Populus tremuloides artificially inoculated with Hypoxylon pruinatum. Can J Bot 47(6):907–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balci Y, Balci S, MacDonald WL, Gottschalk KW (2008) Relative susceptibility of oaks to seven species of Phytophthora isolated from oak forest soils. For Pathol 38:394–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskarathevan J, Jaspers MV, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ (2012) Incidence and distribution of botryosphaeriaceous species in New Zealand vineyards. Eur J Plant Pathol 132:549–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubler WD, Eskalen A, RooneySN FAJ, Khan A (2002) Susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to infection by Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium spp. Phytopathology 92:S32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiny DK, Templeton GE (1991) Effects of spore concentration, temperature, and dew period on disease of field bindweed caused by Phoma proboscis. Phytopathology 81(8):905–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larignon P, Dubos B (2000) Preliminary studies on the biology of Phaeoacremonium. Phytopathol Mediterr 39:184–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Larignon P, Dubos B (2001) The villainy of black dead arm. Wine Vine 82:86–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Luque J, Parladé J, Pera J (2002) Seasonal changes in susceptibility of Quercus suber to Botryosphaeria stevensii and Phytophthora cinnamomi. Plant Pathol 51:338–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z, Morgan DP, Michailides TJ (2001) Effects of water stress on Botryosphaeria blight of pistachio caused by Botryosphaeria dothidea. Plant Dis 85:745–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MollerW J, Kasimatis AN (1980) Protection of grapevine pruning wound from eutypa dieback. Plant Dis 64:278–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostert L, Halleen F, Fourie PH, Crous PW (2005) A review of Phaeoacremonium species involved in Petri disease and esca of grapevines. Phytopathol Mediterr 45:12–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Munkvold GP, Marois JJ (1995) Factors associated with variation in susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to infection by Eutypa lata. Phytopathology 85:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nao M (2008) Effects of inoculum density, leaf wetness duration and nitrate concentration on the occurrence of lettuce leaf spot. J Gen Plant Pathol 74(3):208–212

  • Neal M, Dryden G (2003) How much water does a grapevine use. How much water does a grapevine need: A practical perspective.Proceedings of the Romeo Bragato, 9th annual conference New Zealand

  • Parker KC, Sutton TB (1993) Susceptibility of apple fruit to Botryosphaeria dothidea and isolate variation. Plant Dis 77:385–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusey PL (1989) Influence of water stress on susceptibility of nonwounded peach bark to Botryosphaeria dothidea. Plant Dis 73(12):1000–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pusey PL, Bertrand PF (1993) Seasonal infection of nonwounded peach bark by Botryosphaeria dothidea. Phytopathology 83(8):825–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra S, Mannoni MA, Ligios V (2008) Studies on the susceptibility of pruning wounds to infection by fungi involved in grapevine wood diseases in Italy. Phytopathol Mediterr 47:234–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H, Kemp GHJ, Wingfield MJ (1994) Canker and die‐back of Eucalyptus in South Africa caused by Botryosphaeria dothidea. Plant Pathol 43(6):1031–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnowski MR, Lardner R, Wicks TJ, Scott ES (2007) The influence of grapevine cultivar and isolate of Eutypa lata on wood and foliar symptoms. Plant Dis 91:924–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanosz GR, Blodgett JT, Smithand DR, Kruger EL (2001) Water stress and Sphaeropsis sapinea as a latent pathogen of red pine seedlings. New Phytol 149:531–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll M, Schultz HR, Berkelmann-Loehnertz B (2008) Thermal sensitivity of grapevine leaves affected by Plasmopara viticola and water stress. Vitis 47(2):133–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Úrbez-Torres JR (2011) The status of Botryosphaeriaceae species infecting grapevines. Phytopathol Mediterr 50:S5–S45

    Google Scholar 

  • Úrbez-Torres JR, Gubler WD (2011) Susceptibility of grapevine pruning wounds to infection by Lasioplodia theobromae and Neofusicoccum parvum. Plant Pathol 60:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Úrbez-Torres JR, Battany M, Bettiga LJ, Gispert C, McGourty G, Roncoroni J, Smith RJ, Verdegaal P, Gubler WD (2010) Botryosphaeriaceae species spore-trapping studies in California Vineyards. Plant Dis 94(6):717–724

  • van Niekerk JM, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Fourie PH, Halleen F (2004) DNA phylogeny, morphology and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeria species on grapevines. Mycologia 96(4):781–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Niekerk JM, Fourie PH, Halleen F, Crous PW (2006) Botryosphaeria spp. as grapevine trunk disease pathogen. Phytopathol Mediterr 45:S43–S54

    Google Scholar 

  • van Niekerk J, Strever A, Du Toit G, Halleen F, Fourie P (2011) Influence of water stress on Botryosphaeriaceae disease expression in grapevines. Phytopathol Mediterr 50(4):151–165

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to New Zealand Winegrowers Inc. and Lincoln University for funding this research and Peter Alspach, Biometrician at Plant & Food Research Institute for statistical advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. T. Amponsah.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amponsah, N.T., Jones, E.E., Ridgway, H.J. et al. Factors affecting Neofusicoccum luteum infection and disease progression in grapevines. Australasian Plant Pathol. 43, 547–556 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-014-0294-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-014-0294-7

Keywords

Navigation