Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Use of sex selection techniques for social reasons: A menace

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Indian Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sex selection skewed towards males is a malady that our society is grappling with. The desire to have a child of preferred gender has encouraged people to move beyond the ambit of traditions and explore scientific methods. Despite the controversies around sex-selection for social reasons and strong regulatory mechanisms in place, the demand for such measures has not gone down. On the contrary, traditional practice of consuming indigenous medicines during pregnancy for a male child continues. Recent research highlights the harms of this practice in the form of birth defects and stillbirths. This has led to stricter enforcement of PCPNDT Act and has stimulated the propagation of messages on the harms of these practices in the community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay S, Singh A. History of son preference and sex selection in India and the West. Bull Indian Inst Hist Med. 2003;23:149–67.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reubinoff B, Schenker JG. New advances in sex preselection. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:343–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koshy LM. Planning sex of baby-the Barthakur method. Indian Med Trib. 1994;2:5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gray RH. Natural family planning and sex selection: fact or fiction? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:1982–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Balen F, Inhorn MC. Son prefernce, sex selection, and the “new” new technologies. Int J Health Serv. 2003;33:235–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Malpani A, Malpani A, Modi D. The use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in sex selection for family balancing in India. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4:16–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beernick FJ, Erinsson RJ. Male pre selection through sperm isolation. Fertil Steril. 1982;38:493–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bandyopadhyay S, Singh AJ. Sex selection through traditional drugs in rural north India. Indian J Community Med. 2007;32:32–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manchanda S, Saikia B, Gupta N, Chowdhary S, Puliyel J. Sex ratio at birth in India, its relation to birth order, sex of previous children and use of indigenous medicine. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhagat N, Laskar AR, Sharma N. Women’s perception about sex selection in an urban slum in Delhi. J Reproductive Infant Psychol. 2012;1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Neogi SB, Negandhi PH, Sandhu N, Gupta RK, Ganguli A, Zodpey S, et al. Indigenous medicine use for sex selection during pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations: a population based case control study in Haryana, India. Drug Saf. 2015;doi 10.1007/s40264-015-0309-5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neogi SB, Negandhi P, Chopra S, Das AM, Zodpey S, Gupta RK, et al. Risk factors for stillbirths-findings from a population based case control study, Haryana, India. J Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2016;30:56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh A, Sinha S. Risk factors of congenital malformations in north India: A case control study. J Postgrad Med Edu Res. 2016;50:59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Neogi SB, Negandhi PH, Ganguli A, Chopra S, Sandhu N, Gupta RK, et al. Consumption of indigenous medicines by pregnant women in North India for selecting sex of the foetus: what can it lead to? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. The Pre-conception and pre-natal diagnostic techniques (Prohibition of sex selection) Act, 1994. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Available from: www.pndt.gov.in. Accessed October 19, 2016.

  16. Banerjee S. Sex selection for social reasons-a dilemma. J Indian Med Assoc. 2005;103:557.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dahl E. The presumption in favour of liberty: a comment on the HEFA’s public consultation on sex selection. Reprod Biomed Online. 2004;8:266–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kmietowicz Z. Fertilization authority recommends a ban on sex selection. BMJ. 2003;327:1123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Savulescu J, Dahl E. Sex selection and preimplantation diagnosis: a response to the Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reporductive Medicine. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1879–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zarutskie PW, Muller CH, Magone M, Soules MR. The clinical relevance of sex selection techniques. Fertil Steril. 1989;52:895–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dickens BM. Can sex selection be ethically tolerated? J Med Ethics. 2002;28:335–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India

    Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi, Sanjay Zodpey, Preeti Negandhi & Rakesh Gupta

  2. Indian Institute of Public Health Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Plot number 47, Sector 44, Gurgaon, 122 002, Haryana, India

    Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi

Authors
  1. Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanjay Zodpey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Preeti Negandhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rakesh Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neogi, S.B., Zodpey, S., Negandhi, P. et al. Use of sex selection techniques for social reasons: A menace. Indian Pediatr 54, 99–101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-017-1008-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-017-1008-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation