Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The challenge of post-operative peritonitis after gastrointestinal surgery

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Post-operative peritonitis (PP) is a life-threatening hospital-acquired intra-abdominal infection with high rates of mortality. Diffuse PP remains a challenge for surgeons. Prognosis and outcome of patients are directly related to early diagnosis and prompt intervention. The diagnosis of PP may be difficult because there are no specific clinical signs and laboratory tests to reject or confirm the diagnosis. Atypical clinical features may be responsible for a delay in reoperation. An early diagnosis and prompt treatment is crucial to prevent the development of organ failure and improve the outcome of the patients with PP. The cornerstones in the management of patients with PP are early hemodynamic support, prompt source control and adequate antimicrobial therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roehrborn A, Thomas L, Potreck O, Ebener C, Ohmann C, Goretzki PE, Röher HD (2001) The microbiology of postoperative peritonitis. Clin Infect Dis 33:1513–1519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mulier S, Penninckx F, Verwaest C, Filez L, Aerts R, Fieuws S, Lauwers P (2003) Factors affecting mortality in generalized postoperative peritonitis: multivariate analysis in 96 patients. World J Surg 27(4):379–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ordoñez CA, Puyana JC (2006) Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient. Surg Clin N Am 86(6):1323–1349

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Daams F, Luyer M, Lange JF (2013) Colorectal anastomotic leakage: aspects of prevention, detection and treatment. World J Gastroenterol 19(15):2293–7229

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trencheva K, Morrissey KP, Wells M, Mancuso CA, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Michelassi F, Charlson ME, Milsom JW (2013) Identifying important predictors for anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resection: prospective study on 616 patients. Ann Surg 257(1):108–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russel EM, Park KG (2001) Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1157–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirst NA, Tiernan JP, Millner PA, Jayne DG (2014) Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 16(2):95–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schrock TR, Deveney CW, Dunphy JE (1973) Factor contributing to leakage of colonic anastomosis. Ann Surg 177:513–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Turrentine FE, Denlinger CE, Simpson VB, Garwood RA, Guerlain S, Agrawal A, Friel CM, LaPar DJ, Stukenborg GJ, Jones RS (2015) Morbidity, mortality, cost, and survival estimates of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks. J Am Coll Surg 220(2):195–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, Clavien PA (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240(6):1074–1084

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vyas S, Mitchell I, Smart J, Stoker D, Woolf AK (2009) Routine underwater seal drains are not required after transthoracic oesophagectomy: a pilot study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35(4):694–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Q, Jiang YJ, Li J, Yang F, Di Y, Yao L, Jin C, Fu DL (2014) Is routine drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy? World J Gastroenterol 20:8110–8118

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Buren G II, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ, Winter J, Behrman SW, Zyromski NJ, Vollmer C, Velanovich V, Riall T, Muscarella P, Trevino J, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM, Behrns K, Ellison EC, Barakat O, Perry KA, Drebin J, House M, Abdel-Misih S, Silberfein EJ, Goldin S, Brown K, Mohammed S, Hodges SE, McElhany A, Issazadeh M, Jo E, Mo Q, Fisher WE (2014) A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg 259:605–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Isik B, Yilmaz S, Kirimlioglu V, Sogutlu G, Yilmaz M, Katz D (2007) A life-saving but inadequately discussed procedure: tube duodenostomy. Known and unknown aspects. World J Surg 31(8):1616–1624 (discussion 1625-6)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lamb PJ, Griffin SM, Chandrashekar MV, Richardson DL, Karat D, Hayes N (2004) Prospective study of routine contrast radiology after total gastrectomy. Br J Surg 91(8):1015–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Z, Chen J, Su K, Dong Z (2015) Abdominal drainage versus no drainage post-gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD008788

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schäfer M, Mariette C, Braga M, Carli F, Demartines N, Griffin SM, Lassen K (2014) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Group. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Br J Surg 101(10):1209–1229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Urbach DR, Kennedy ED, Cohen MM (1999) Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 229(2):174–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, Chen JS, Chen HH, Chiang JM, Tang R (2005) Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 241(1):9–13

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsujinaka S, Konishi F (2011) Drain vs no drain after colorectal surgery. Indian J Surg Oncol 2(1):3–8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsujinaka S, Kawamura YJ, Konishi F, Maeda T, Mizokami K (2008) Pelvic drainage for anterior resection revisited: use of drains in anastomotic leaks. ANZ J Surg 78(6):461–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Velde CJ (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92(2):211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rondelli F, Bugiantella W, Vedovati MC, Balzarotti R, Avenia N, Mariani E, Agnelli G, Becattini C (2014) To drain or not to drain extraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 16(2):O35–O42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tortorelli AP, Alfieri S, Sanchez AM, Rosa F, Papa V, Di Miceli D, Bellantone C, Doglietto GB (2015) Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: incidence, risk factors, and management. Am Surg 81(1):41–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cao F, Li J, Li F (2012) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:803–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults (2015) Postoperative delirium in older adults: best practice statement from the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg 220(2):136–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stawicki SP, Prosciak MP, Gerlach AT, Bloomston M, Davido HT, Lindsey DE, Dillhoff ME, Evans DC, Steinberg SM, Cook CH (2011) Atrial fibrillation after esophagectomy: an indicator of postoperative morbidity. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 59(6):399–405

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ (1992) American college of chest physicians/society of critical care medicine consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest 101:1644–1655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Torer N, Yorganci K, Elker D, Sayek I (2010) Prognostic factors of the mortality of postoperative intraabdominal infections. Infection 38(4):255–260

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mäkelä J, Kairaluoma MI (1988) Relaparotomy for postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis in jaundiced patients. Br J Surg 75(12):1157–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bader FG, Schröder M, Kujath P, Muhl E, Bruch HP, Eckmann C (2009) Diffuse postoperative peritonitis—value of diagnostic parameters and impact of early indication for relaparotomy. Eur J Med Res 14(11):491–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh PP, Zeng IS, Srinivasa S, Lemanu DP, Connolly AB, Hill AG (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of use of serum C-reactive protein levels to predict anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 101(4):339–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Noble F, Curtis N, Harris S, Kelly JJ, Bailey IS, Byrne JP, Underwood TJ (2012) South Coast Cancer Collaboration—Oesophago-Gastric (SC-OG). Risk assessment using a novel score to predict anastomotic leak and major complications after esophageal resection. J Gastrointest Surg 16(6):1083–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Findlay JM, Tilson RC, Harikrishnan A, Sgromo B, Marshall RE, Maynard ND, Gillies RS, Middleton MR (2014) Attempted validation of the NUn score and inflammatory markers as predictors of esophageal anastomotic leak and major complications. Dis Esophagus. doi:10.1111/dote.12244

    Google Scholar 

  35. Evans HL, Raymond DP, Pelletier SJ, Crabtree TD, Pruett TL, Sawyer RG (2001) Diagnosis of intra-abdominal infection in the critically ill patient. Curr Opin Crit Care 7(2):117–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rotstein OD, Meakins JL (1990) Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of intraabdominal infections. World J Surg 14(2):159–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Low DE (2011) Diagnosis and management of anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 15(8):1319–1322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Theisen J, Bartels H, Weiss W, Berger H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (2005) Current concepts of percutaneous abscess drainage in postoperative retention. J Gastrointest Surg 9(2):280–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Khurrum Baig M, Hua Zhao R, Batista O, Uriburu JP, Singh JJ, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2002) Percutaneous postoperative intra-abdominal abscess drainage after elective colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 6(3):159–164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Benoist S, Panis Y, Pannegeon V, Soyer P, Watrin T, Boudiaf M, Valleur P (2002) Can failure of percutaneous drainage of postoperative abdominal abscesses be predicted? Am J Surg 184(2):148–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Burke LM, Bashir MR, Gardner CS, Parsee AA, Marin D, Vermess D, Bhattacharya SD, Thacker JK, Jaffe TA (2014) Image-guided percutaneous drainage vs. surgical repair of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: is there a difference in hospital course or hospitalization cost? Abdom Imaging 40(5):1279–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, Peterson E, Tomlanovich M (2001) Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Eng J Med 345:1368–1377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, Harrison DA, Sadique MZ, Grieve RD, Jahan R, Harvey SE, Bell D, Bion JF, Coats TJ, Singer M, Young JD, Rowan KM (2015) ProMISe trial Investigators. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med 372(14):1301–1311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Moore LJ, Moore FA (2012) Epidemiology of sepsis in surgical patients. Surg Clin N Am 92(6):1425–1443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL, Emergency Physicians Canadian Critical Care Society European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases European Society of Intensive Care Medicine European Respiratory Society International Sepsis Forum Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine Society of Critical Care Medicine Society of Hospital Medicine Surgical Infection Society World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (2008) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 36(1):296–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sartelli M, Catena F, Di Saverio S, Ansaloni L, Malangoni M, Moore EE, Moore FA, Ivatury R, Coimbra R, Leppaniemi A, Biffl W, Kluger Y, Fraga GP, Ordonez CA, Marwah S, Gerych I, Lee JG, Tranà C, Coccolini F, Corradetti F, Kirkby-Bott J (2014) Current concept of abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg 9(1):22

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Marshall JC (2010) Principles of source control in the early management of sepsis. Curr Infect Dis Rep 12(5):345–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Marshall JC, al Naqbi A (2009) Principles of source control in the management of sepsis. Crit Care Clin 25(4):753–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nguyen NT, Rudersdorf PD, Smith BR, Reavis K, Nguyen XM, Stamos MJ (2011) Management of gastrointestinal leaks after minimally invasive esophagectomy: conventional treatments vs. endoscopic stenting. J Gastrointest Surg 15(11):1952–1960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schaheen L, Blackmon SH, Nason KS (2014) Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review. Am J Surg 208(4):536–543

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sanjay P, Kellner M, Tait IS (2012) The role of interventional radiology in the management of surgical complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 14(12):812–817. doi:10.1111/j.1477-2574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Calicis B, Parc Y, Caplin S, Frileux P, Dehni N, Ollivier JM, Parc R (2002) Treatment of postoperative peritonitis of small-bowel origin with continuous enteral nutrition and succus entericus reinfusion. Arch Surg 137(3):296–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Parc Y, Frileux P, Schmitt G, Dehni N, Ollivier JM, Parc R (2000) Management of postoperative peritonitis after anterior resection: experience from a referral intensive care unit. Dis Colon Rectum 43(5):579–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hedrick TL, Sawyer RG, Foley EF, Friel CM (2006) Anastomotic leak and the loop ileostomy: friend or foe? Dis Colon Rectum 49(8):1167–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Richards CH, Roxburgh CS (2015) Scottish Surgical Research Group (SSRG). Surgical outcome in patients undergoing reversal of Hartmann’s procedures: a multicenter study. Colorectal Dis 17(3):242–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hodgson R, An V, Stupart DA, Guest GD, Watters DA (2015) Who gets Hartmann’s reversed in a regional centre? Surgeon. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2014.11.001

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gramlich L, Kichian K, Pinilla J, Rodych NJ, Dhaliwal R, Heyland DK (2004) Does enteral nutrition compared to parenteral nutrition result in better outcomes in critically ill adult patients? A systematic review of the literature. Nutrition 20(10):843–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Coetzee E, Rahim Z, Boutall A, Goldberg P (2014) Refeeding enteroclysis as an alternative to parenteral nutrition for enteric fistula. Colorectal Dis 16(10):823–830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sartelli M (2010) A focus on intra-abdominal infections. World J Emerg Surg 19(5):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Demetriades D (2012) Total management of the open abdomen. Int Wound J 9(Suppl 1):17–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Augustin P, Kermarrec N, Muller-Serieys C, Lasocki S, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP, Valin N, Desmonts JM, Montravers P (2010) Risk factors for multidrug resistant bacteria and optimization of empirical antibiotic therapy in postoperative peritonitis. Crit Care 14(1):R20

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lee DS, Ryu JA, Chung CR, Yang J, Jeon K, Suh GY, Lee WY, Park CM (2015) Risk factors for acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria in patients with anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(4):497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sartelli M, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Corbella D, Moore EE, Marangoni M, Velmahos G, Coimbra R, Koike K, Leppaniemi A, Biffl W, Balogh Z, Bendinelli C, Gupta S, Kluger Y, Agresta F, Di Saverio S, Tugnoli G, Jovine E, Ordonez CA, Whelan JF, Fraga GP, Gomes CA, Pereira GA, Yuan KC, Bala M, Peev MP, Ben-Ishay O, Cui Y, Marwah S, Zachariah S, Wani I, Rangarajan M, Sakakushev B, Kong V, Ahmed A, Abbas A, Gonsaga RA, Guercioni G, Vettoretto N, Poiasina E, Díaz-Nieto R, Massalou D, Skrovina M, Gerych I, Augustin G, Kenig J, Khokha V, Tranà C, Kok KY, Mefire AC, Lee JG, Hong SK, Lohse HA, Ghnnam W, Verni A, Lohsiriwat V, Siribumrungwong B, El Zalabany T, Tavares A, Baiocchi G, Das K, Jarry J, Zida M, Sato N, Murata K, Shoko T, Irahara T, Hamedelneel AO, Naidoo N, Adesunkanmi AR, Kobe Y, Ishii W, Oka K, Izawa Y, Hamid H, Khan I, Attri A, Sharma R, Sanjuan J, Badiel M, Barnabé R (2014) Complicated intra-abdominal infections worldwide: the definitive data of the CIAOW Study. World J Emerg Surg 14(9):37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Montravers P, Mira JP, Gangneux JP, Leroy O, Lortholary O, AmarCand study group (2011) A multicentre study of antifungal strategies and outcome of Candida spp. peritonitis in intensive-care units. Clin Microbiol Infect 17(7):1061–1067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Snydman DR (2012) Empiric antibiotic selection strategies for healthcare-associated pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections, and catheter-associated bacteremia. J Hosp Med 7(Suppl 1):S2–S12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Krarup PM, Nordholm-Carstensen A, Jorgensen LN, Harling H (2014) Anastomotic leak increases distant recurrence and long-term mortality after curative resection for colonic cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Surg 259(5):930–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Espín E, Ciga MA, Pera M, Ortiz H (2015) Spanish Rectal Cancer Project. Oncological outcome following anastomotic leak in rectal surgery. Br J Surg 102(4):416–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Nachiappan S, Askari A, Malietzis G, Giacometti M, White I, Jenkins JT, Kennedy RH, Faiz O (2015) The impact of anastomotic leak and its treatment on cancer recurrence and survival following elective colorectal cancer resection. World J Surg 39(4):1052–1058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Kofoed SC, Calatayud D, Jensen LS, Helgstrand F, Achiam MP, De Heer P, Svendsen LB (2015) Danish Esophageal, Cardia and Stomach Cancer Group. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after gastroesophageal cancer resection is associated with increased risk of recurrence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150(1):42–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Salvans S, Mayol X, Alonso S, Messeguer R, Pascual M, Mojal S, Grande L, Pera M (2014) Postoperative peritoneal infection enhances migration and invasion capacities of tumor cells in vitro: an insight into the association between anastomotic leak and recurrence after surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 260(5):939–943 (discussion 943-4)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Via Santa Lucia, 2, Macerata, Italy

    Massimo Sartelli & Maurizio Nestori

  2. Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK

    Ewen A. Griffiths

Authors
  1. Massimo Sartelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ewen A. Griffiths
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maurizio Nestori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Sartelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standard

The article is in accordance with the ethical standards.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

The article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the authors.

Informed consent

No informed consent is required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sartelli, M., Griffiths, E.A. & Nestori, M. The challenge of post-operative peritonitis after gastrointestinal surgery. Updates Surg 67, 373–381 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0324-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0324-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation