Abstract
This study aimed to assess the current effectiveness of Oncologic Multidisciplinary Groups (OMGs) meetings across central Tuscany through surgeons’ reports and their individual perceived benefits on colorectal cancer management. One hundred and sixty-seven general surgeons received a questionnaire with 21 questions covering organizational characteristics of OMGs and the individual perceived benefits of OMGs. The responses were analyzed by hospital setting (teaching vs. community hospital). The reply rate was 62.8 %, and 82 respondent surgeons (49.1 %) were involved in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients. At community hospitals, there was a more frequent participation of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists and pathologists; a less selection of discussed cases was performed; and almost all decisions were inserted into official patient charts (p < 0.05). Community hospital surgeons perceived more of a benefit than academic surgeons: OMGs ensure that all treatment options are considered and improve timeliness of care, patient outcomes, patient satisfaction and communication with patients (p < 0.05). The surveyed surgeons reported that OMGs offer a modest degree of protection from malpractice but improve communications between colleagues and are an opportunity for personal professional development. Professionals regularly participating in well-conducted and well-organized OMGs for colorectal cancer felt that the multidisciplinary strategy may be advantageous to both patients and caregivers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cervantes A, Roselló S, Rodríguez-Braun E, Navarro S, Campos S, Hernández A, García-Granero E (2008) Progress in the multidisciplinary treatment of gastrointestinal cancer and the impact on clinical practice: perioperative management of rectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 19(Suppl 7):VII-266–VII-272
Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, Fraker DL, Czerniecki BJ, Rosato EF, Lawton T, Conant EF, Orel SG, Schuchter L, Fox KR, Zieber N, Glick JH, Solin LJ (2001) The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer 91:1231–1237
Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, Roubidoux MA, Chang AE, Kleer CG, Diehl KM, Cimmino VM, Pierce L, Hayes D, Newman LA, Sabel MS (2006) Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 107:2346–2351
Department of Health, National Health Service (2004) Topic 2A The generic multidisciplinary team (MDT), in Manual for Cancer Services 2004. Department of Health Publications, London
Blamey R, Cataliotti L (2000) The requirements of a specialist breast unit. Eur J Cancer 36:2288–2293
Van Belle S (2008) How to implement the multidisciplinary approach in prostate cancer management: the Belgian model. BJU Int 101(suppl 2):2–4
Lehmann K, Guller U, Bugnon S, Zuber M (2008) Interdisciplinary tumour boards in Switzerland: quo vadis? Swiss Med Wkly 138:123–127
American College of Surgeons (2004) Commission on cancer: cancer program standards. American College of Surgeons, Chicago
Chan WF, Cheung PS, Epstein RJ, Mak J (2006) Multidisciplinary approach to the management of breast cancer in Hong Kong. World J Surg 30:2095–2100
National Breast Cancer Centre (2005) Multidisciplinary meetings for cancer care: a guide for health service providers. National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown
Nyquist JG, Radecki SE, Gates JD, Abrahamson S (1995) An educational intervention to improve hospital tumor conferences. J Cancer Educ 10(2):71–77
Petty JK, Vetto JT (2002) Beyond doughnuts: tumor board recommendations influence patient care. J Cancer Educ 17(2):97–100
Radecki SE, Nyquist JG, Gates JD, Abrahamson S, Henson DE (1995) Educational characteristics of tumor conferences in teaching and non-teaching hospitals. J Cancer Educ 9(4):204–216
Piano Oncologico Nazionale 2010–2012 (2010) Ministero della salute. http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_1440_allegato.pdf
Tuscany regional council. DGR n. 532 del 27/05/02 http://web.rete.toscana.it/attinew/?LO=00000001a6b7c8d900000003000000370000164f39726f9a0000000000012b8000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000&MItypeObj=application/pdf
Tuscany regional council. DGR n. 115 del 20/02/06 http://web.rete.toscana.it/attinew/?LO=00000001a6b7c8d90000000300000021000065d2397971200000000000012b8000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000&MItypeObj=application/pdf
Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, Expert Panel on Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Standards (2007) Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 43(6):1002–1010
Wright FC, Lookhong N, Urbach D, Davis D, McLeod RS, Gagliardi AR (2009) Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: identifying opportunities to promote implementation. Ann Surg Oncol 16(10):2731–2737
Kellerman SE, Herold J (2001) Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 20:61–67
Macaskill EJ, Thrush S, Walker EM, Dixon JM (2006) Surgeons’ views on multi-disciplinary breast meetings. Eur J Cancer 42:905–908
NHS Cancer Plan (2000) Department of Health, London
Guidance on Cancer Services (2002) Improving outcomes in breast cancer. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London
Look Hong NJ, Gagliardi AR, Bronskill SE, Paszat LF, Wright FC (2010) Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: exploring obstacles and facilitators to their implementation. J Oncol Pract 6(2):61–68
Gabel M, Hilton NE, Nathanson SD (1997) Multidisciplinary breast cancer clinics. Do they work? Cancer 79:2380–2384
Smith DE, Davis S, Polissar L (1979) The hospital cancer program: its impact on care of the rural cancer patient. Am Surg 45:730–737
Tripathy D (2003) Multidisciplinary care for breast cancer: barriers and solutions. Breast J 9:60–63
Hong NJ, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, Paszat LF (2010) Examining the potential relationship between multidisciplinary cancer care and patient survival: an international literature review. J Surg Oncol 102(2):125–134
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Lucia Salvischiani, M.D., Chiara Linari, M.D., Cinzia Tommasi, M.D., Tatiana Bargellini, M.D., Luigi Maria Pernice, M.D., Tiziana Cavalli, M.D., Vanessa Carroni, M.D., Matteo Giannelli, M.D., Agnese Gori, M.D., Franco Franceschini, M.D., Iacopo Monaci, M.D. and Nico Console M.D. for acquisition of data.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feroci, F., Lenzi, E., Baraghini, M. et al. General surgeons’ views on Oncologic Multidisciplinary Group meetings as part of colorectal cancer care. Updates Surg 64, 273–278 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-012-0181-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-012-0181-0