Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evoking plasticity through sensory stimulation: Implications for learning and rehabilitation

  • Review article
  • Published:
e-Neuroforum

Abstract

The gold standard for improving sensory, motor and or cognitive abilities is long-term training and practicing. Recent work, however, suggests that intensive training may not be necessary. Improved performance can be effectively acquired by a complementary approach in which the learning occurs in response to mere exposure to repetitive sensory stimulation. Such training-independent sensory learning (TISL), which has been intensively studied in the somatosensory system, induces in humans lasting changes in perception and neural processing, without any explicit task training. It has been suggested that the effectiveness of this form of learning stems from the fact that the stimulation protocols used are optimized to alter synaptic transmission and efficacy. TISL provides novel ways to investigate in humans the relation between learning processes and underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms, and to explore alternative strategies for intervention and therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amitay S, Irwin A, Moore DR (2006) Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli. Nat Neurosci 9:1446–1448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beste C, Dinse HR (2013) Learning without training. Curr Biol 23:R489–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bliss TV, Collingridge GL (1993) A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 361:31–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clapp WC, Hamm JP, Kirk IJ, Teyler TJ (2012) Translating long-term potentiation from animals to humans: a novel method for noninvasive assessment of cortical plasticity. Biol Psychiatry 71 496–502

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Conforto AB, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG (2002) Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Ann Neurol 51:122–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cotman CW, Monaghan DT, Ganong AH (1988) Excitatory Amino Acid neurotransmission: NMDA receptors and Hebb-type synaptic plasticity. Ann Rev Neurosci 11:61–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dinse HR, Ragert P, Pleger B, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M (2003a) Pharmacological modulation of perceptual learning and associated cortical reorganization. Science 301:91–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dinse HR, Ragert P, Pleger B, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M (2003b) GABAergic mechanisms gate tactile discrimination learning. Neuroreport 14:1747–1751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dinse HR, Kalisch T, Ragert P, Pleger B, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M (2005) Improving human haptic performance in normal and impaired human populations through unattended activation-based learning. Trans Appl Percep 2:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dinse HR, Kleibel N, Kalisch T, Ragert P, Wilimzig C, Tegenthoff M (2006) Tactile coactivation resets age-related decline of human tactile discrimination. Ann Neurol 60:88–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dinse HR, Bohland J, Kalisch, Kraemer M, Freund E, Beeser E, Hömberg V, Stephan KM (2008) Repetitive sensory stimulation training in stroke. Europ J Neurol 15:400

  12. Dinse HR, Kattenstroth JC, Gattica Tossi MA, Tegenthoff M, Kalisch T (2011) Sensory stimulation for augmenting perception, sensorimotor behavior and cognition. In: Augmenting Cognition, Segev I, Markram H (Eds) EPFL Press. Lausanne, Swizerland, pp. 11–39

    Google Scholar 

  13. Freyer F, Reinacher M, Nolte G, Dinse HR, Ritter P (2012). Repetitive tactile stimulation changes resting-state functional connectivity—implications for treatment of sensorimotor decline. Front Hum Neurosci 6:144

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freyer F, Becker R, Dinse HR, Ritter P (2013) State-dependent perceptual learning. J Neurosci 33:2900–2907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Godde B, Spengler G, Dinse HR (1996) Associative pairing of tactile stimulation induces somatosensory cortical reorganization in rats and humans. Neuroreport 8:281–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Godde B, Stauffenberg B, Spengler F, Dinse HR (2000) Tactile coactivation induced changes in spatial discrimination performance. J Neurosci 20:1597–1604

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gutnisky DA, Hansen BJ, Iliescu BF, Dragoi V (2009) Attention alters visual plasticity during exposure-based learning. Current Biol 19:555–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoeffken O, Veit M, Knossalla F, Lissek S, Bliem B, Ragert P, Dinse HR, Tegenthoff M (2007) Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by tactile coactivation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans correlates with perceptual gain. J Physiol 584:463–471

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kattenstroth JC, Kalisch T, Tegenthoff M, Dinse HR (2012) Long-term sensory stimulation therapy improves hand function and restores cortical responsiveness in patients with chronic cerebral lesions. Three single case studies. Front Hum Neurosci 6:244. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00244

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kleim JA, Chan S, Pringle E, Schallert K, Procaccio V, Jimenez R, Cramer SC (2006) BDNF val66met polymorphism is associated with modified experience-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Nat Neurosci 9:735–737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Ferbert A, Wroe S, Asselman P, Marsden CD (1993) Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol 471:501–519

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, Miller K, Lincoln N, Partridge C, Wellwood I, Langhorne P (2004) Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 35:2529–2539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lynch MA (2004) Long-term potentiation and memory. Physiol Rev 84:87–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Malenka RC, Bear MF (2004) LTP and LTD: an embarrassment of riches. Neuron 44:5–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Muret D, Dinse HR, Macchione S, Urquizar C, Farnè A, Reilly K (2014) Touch improvement at the hand transfers to the face. Current Biol 24:R736–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nicoll RA, Malenka RC (1995) Contrasting properties of two forms of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature 377:115–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parsons CG, Danysz W, Quack G (1999) Memantine is a clinically well tolerated N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist–a review of preclinical data. Neuropharm 38:735–767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pleger B, Dinse HR, Ragert P, Schwenkreis P, Malin JP, Tegenthoff M (2001) Shifts in cortical representations predict human discrimination improvement. Proc Nat Acad Sci 98:12255–12260

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pleger B, Foerster AF, Ragert P, Dinse HR, Schwenkreis P, Malin JP, Nicolas V, Tegenthoff M (2003) Functional imaging of perceptual learning in human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex. Neuron 40:643–653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ragert P, Kalisch T, Bliem B, Franzkowiak S, Dinse HR (2008) Differential effects in human tactile discrimination behavior evoked by tactile high- and low-frequency stimulation. BMC Neurosci 9:9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ramachandran VS, Stewart M, Rogers-Ramachandran DC (1992) Perceptual correlates of massive cortical reorganization. Neuroreport 3:583–586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sagi D (2011) Perceptual learning in vision research. Vision Res 51:1552–1566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sasaki Y, Nanez JE, Watanabe T (2010) Advances in visual perceptual learning and plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:53–60

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sawaki L, Wu CW, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG (2006) Effects of somatosensory stimulation on use-dependent plasticity in chronic stroke. Stroke 37:246–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Seitz A, Dinse HR (2007) A common framework for perceptual learning. Current Opin Neurobiol 17:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T (2002) New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nature Rev Neurosci 3:228–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Teyler TJ, Hamm JP, Clapp WC, Johnson BW, Corballis MC, Kirk IJ (2005) Long-term potentiation of human visual evoked responses. Eur J Neurosci 21:2045–2050. doi:10.1007/s13295-015-0003-1

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wright BA, Sabin AT, Zhang Y, Marrone N, Fitzgerald MB (2010) Enhancing perceptual learning by combining practice with periods of additional sensory stimulation. J Neurosci 30:12868–12977

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG (2006) Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:351–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neural Plasticity Lab, Institute fur Neuroinformatik, Ruhr University Bochum, Building NB 3, 44780, Bochum, Germany

    Hubert R. Dinse

  2. Neurologische Klinik am Berufsgenossenschaftlichen Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany

    Hubert R. Dinse & Martin Tegenthoff

Authors
  1. Hubert R. Dinse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Tegenthoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hubert R. Dinse.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dinse, H., Tegenthoff, M. Evoking plasticity through sensory stimulation: Implications for learning and rehabilitation. e-Neuroforum 6, 11–20 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13295-015-0003-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13295-015-0003-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation