Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phoenix flagships: Conservation values and guanaco reintroduction in an anthropogenic landscape

  • Report
  • Published:
Ambio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multiple forms of valuation contribute to public acceptance of conservation projects. Here, we consider how esthetic, intrinsic, and utilitarian values contribute to public attitudes toward a proposed reintroduction of guanaco (Lama guanicoe) in a silvopastoral system of central Chile. The nexus among landscape perceptions and valuations, support for reintroductions, and management of anthropogenic habitats is of increasing interest due to the proliferation of conservation approaches combining some or all of these elements, including rewilding and reconciliation ecology, for example. We assessed attitudes and values through an online questionnaire for residents of Santiago, Chile, using multiple methods including photo-montages and Likert scale assessments of value-based statements. We also combined the questionnaire approach with key informant interviews. We find strong support for the reintroduction of guanacos into the Chilean silvopastoral system (‘espinal’) in terms of esthetic and intrinsic values but less in terms of utilitarian values. Respondents preferred a scenario of espinal with guanacos and expressed interest in visiting it, as well as support for the reintroduction project on the basis that guanacos are native to central Chile. We suggest that reintroduced guanacos could serve as a ‘phoenix flagship species’ for espinal conservation, that is, a flagship species that has gone regionally extinct and is known but not associated with the region in the cultural memory. We consider how the lack of local cultural identity can both help and weaken phoenix flagships, which we expect to become more common.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Alagona, P.A. 2004. Biography of a “feathered pig”: The California condor conservation controversy. Journal of the History of Biology 37: 557–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armesto, J.J., D. Manuschevich, A. Mora, C. Smith-Ramirez, R. Rozzi, A.M. Abarzúa, and P.A. Marquet. 2010. From the Holocene to the Anthropocene: A historical framework for land cover change in southwestern South America in the past 15000 years. Land Use Policy 27: 148–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J., C. Ovalle, and J. Avendano. 1993. Ecological and economic rehabilitation of degraded ‘Espinales’ in the subhumid Mediterranean-climate region of central Chile. Landscape Urban Planning 24: 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aveling, R., and A. Mitchell. 1982. Is rehabilitating Orang Utans worth while? Oryx 16: 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley, D., and G. Edwards-Jones. 2006. Stakeholders’ perceptions of the impacts of invasive exotic plant species in the Mediterranean region. GeoJournal 65: 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barua, M., M. Root-Bernstein, R.J. Ladle, and P. Jepson. 2011. Defining flagship uses is critical for flagship selection: A critique of the IUCN climate change flagship fleet. AMBIO 40: 431–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 57: 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brambilla, M., M. Gustin, and C. Celada. 2013. Species appeal predicts conservation status. Biological Conservation 160: 209–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, S.D. 2012. Environment and identity. In The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology, ed. S.D. Clayton, 164–180. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crites Jr, S.L., L.R. Fabrigar, and R.E. Petty. 1994. Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20: 619–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Val, G.D.L.F., J.A. Mezquida, and J.V. de Lucio Fernández. 2004. El aprecio por el paisaje y su utilidad en la conservación de los paisajes de Chile central. Rev Ecosistemas 13: 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K. 1990. The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, W.L., F. Bas, C. Bonacic, C. Cunazza, and N. Soto. 1997. Striving to manage Patagonia guanacos for sustained use in the grazing agroecosystems of southern Chile. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, E.R., G.A. Espinosa, and I. Fuenzalida. 1984. Cambios vegetacionales recientes y percepción ambiental: el caso de Santiago de Chile. Revista de geografía Norte Grande (Chile) 11: 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrido Escobar, F. 2010. La importancia de los camélidos en el mundo indígena y prehispánico nacional. In Plan Nacional de Conservación del Guanaco (Lama guanicoe) en Chile 2010–2015: Macrozona Norte y Centro, ed. M.P. Grimberg and M.P. Pardo, 25–29. Santiago: CONAF.

  • Gifford, R., and R. Sussman. 2012. Environmental Attitudes. In The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology, ed. S.D. Clayton, 65–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobster, P.H. 2008. Yellowstone hotspot: Reflections on scenic beauty, ecology and the aesthetic experience of landscape. Landscape Journal 27: 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimberg Pardo, M.P. 2010. Plan Nacional de Conservación del Guanaco (Lama guanicoe) en Chile 2010–2015, Macrozona Norte y Centro. Chile: CONAF.

  • Hull, R.B., and W.P. Stewart. 1992. Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 12: 101–114.

  • Irarrázabal, A.R. 2008. El orgullo de preservar nuestra identidad, Tema Empresa. Tell Magazine. http://assets.wanaku.cl/prensa/20080309_prensa_entrevista_tell.pdf. Accessed June 2013.

  • Iriarte, A. 2000. Normativa legal sobre conservación y uso sustentable de vicuña y guanaco en Chile. In Manejo Sustentable de la Vicuña y el Guanaco, ed. B. González, F. Bas, C. Tala, and A. Iriarte, 209–221. Santiago: SAG, PUC, FIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepson, P., and S. Canney. 2003. Values led conservation. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12: 271–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W., J.S. Boster, and J.A. Hartley. 1995. Environmental values in American Culture. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kueffer, C., and C.N. Kaiser-Bunbury. 2013. Reconciling conflicting perspectives for conservation in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment. doi:10.1890/120201.

  • Ladle, R., and P. Jepson. 2008. Towards a biocultural theory of avoided extinction. Conservation Letters 1: 111–118.

  • Leader-Williams, N., and H. Dublin. 2000. Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’. In Priorities for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity: Has the Panda had its day?, ed. A. Entwistle, and N. Dunstone, 53–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. 1980. Human influence on the distribution and abundance of wild Chilean mammals: Prehistoric—Present. PhD thesis, University of Washington.

  • Montag, J., M.E. Patterson, and W.A. Freimund. 2005. The wolf viewing experience in the Lamar Valley of Yellowstone National Park. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 10: 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montes, M.C., P.D. Carmanchahi, A. Rey, and M.C. Funes. 2006. Live shearing free-ranging guanacos (Lama guanicoe) in Patagonia for sustainable use. Journal of Arid Environments 64: 616–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., R.A. Mittermeier, C.G. Mittermeier, G.A.B. da Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–859.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novaro, A.S.J. 2010. Restoration of the Guanaco, Icon of Patagonia. In State of the wild: A global portrait, ed. E. Fearn, K.H. Redford, and W. Woods, 122–128. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, L.M., and H.M. Pereira. 2012. Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems 15: 900–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papworth, S.K., J. Rist, L. Coad, and E.J. Milner-Gulland. 2009. Evidence for shifting baseline syndrome in conservation. Conservation Letters 2: 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, D.R. 1998. “Green fire” returns to the Southwest: Reintroduction of the Mexican Wolf. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26: 799–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauchard, A., and P. Villarroel. 2002. Protected areas in Chile: History current status and challenges. Natural Areas Journal 22: 318–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford, K.H., J. Berger, and S. Zack. 2013. Abundance as a conservation value. Oryx 47: 157–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolston III, H. 1987. Beauty and the Beast: Aesthetic Experience of wildlife. In Valuing wildlife: Economic and social perspectives, ed. D.J. Decker, and G.R. Goff, 187–196. London: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, M. 2014. Nostalgia, the fleeting and the rare in Chilean relationships to nature and non human animals. Society and Animals 22: 560–579 (online first).

  • Root-Bernstein, M., and J. Armesto. 2013. Selection and implementation of a flagship fleet in a locally undervalued region of high endemicity. AMBIO 42: 776–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, M., and F. Jaksic. 2013. The Chilean Espinal: Restoration for a Sustainable Silvopastoral System. Restoration Ecology 21: 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, F.P. 2013. Seeing and doing conservation differently: A discussion of landscape aesthetics, wilderness, and biodiversity conservation. Journal of Environment Development 22: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, P.J., and H. van Heezik. 2013. Reintroductions to “Ratchet Up” public perceptions in Biodiversity. In Ignoring nature no more, ed. M. Bekoff. London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonetti, J.A. 1999. Diversity and conservation of terrestrial vertebrates in mediterranean Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 72: 493–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skewes, O., F. González, M. Maldonado, C. Ovalle, and L. Rubilar. 2000. Desarrollo y evaluación de técnicas de cosecha y captura de guanacos para su aprovechamiento comercial y sustentable en Tierra del Fuego. In Manejo Sustentable de la Vicuña y el Guanaco, ed. B. González, F. Bas, C. Tala, and A. Iriarte, 117–141. Santiago: SAG PUC FIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M.E. 1985. What is conservation biology? BioScience 35: 727–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surova, D., and T. Pinto-Correia. 2008. Landscape preferences in the cork oak Montado region of Alentejo southern Portugal: Searching for valuable landscape characteristics for different user groups. Landscape Research 33: 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teel, T.L., M.J. Manfredo, and H.M. Stinchfield. 2007. The need and theoretical basis for exploring wildlife value orientations cross-culturally. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 12: 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo, D., M.S. Agudelo, and A.L. Bentley. 2011. Shifting of ecological restoration benchmarks and their social impacts: Digging deeper into Pleistocene re-wilding. Restoration Ecology 19: 564–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211: 453–458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van der Berg, H., A.S.R. Manstead, J. van der Pligt, and D.H.J. Wigboldus. 2006. The impact of affective and cognitive focus on attitude formation. The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42: 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veríssimo, D. 2013. Influencing human behaviour: an underutilized tool for biodiversity management. Conservation Evidence 10: 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veríssimo, D., I. Fraser, J. Groombridge, R. Bristol, and D.C. MacMillan. 2009. Birds as tourism flagship species: A case study of tropical islands. Animal Conservation 12: 549–558.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to U. Roll, M. Zanuso, and B. Barca for advice and technical assistance. We also thank the key informants for their participation. This research was supported by FONDECYT grant No. 3130336.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meredith Root-Bernstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindon, A., Root-Bernstein, M. Phoenix flagships: Conservation values and guanaco reintroduction in an anthropogenic landscape. Ambio 44, 458–471 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0608-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0608-6

Keywords

Navigation