Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Applying a Comprehensive Contextual Climate Change Vulnerability Framework to New Zealand’s Tourism Industry

  • Report
  • Published:
AMBIO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conceptualisations of ‘vulnerability’ vary amongst scholarly communities, contributing to a wide variety of applications. Research investigating vulnerability to climate change has often excluded non-climatic changes which may contribute to degrees of vulnerability perceived or experienced. This paper introduces a comprehensive contextual vulnerability framework which incorporates physical, social, economic and political factors which could amplify or reduce vulnerability. The framework is applied to New Zealand’s tourism industry to explore its value in interpreting a complex, human-natural environment system with multiple competing vulnerabilities. The comprehensive contextual framework can inform government policy and industry decision making, integrating understandings of climate change within the broader context of internal and external social, physical, economic, and institutional stressors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Adger, W.N. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16: 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baggio, R. 2008. Symptoms of complexity in a tourism system. Tourism Analysis 13: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becken, S. 2007. Tourists’ perception of international air travel’s impact on the global climate and potential climate change policies. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 15: 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becken, S., and J.E. Hay. 2007. Tourism and climate change: Risks and opportunities. Clevedon: Channel View Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becken, S., and J. Wilson. 2013. The impact of weather on tourist travel. Tourism Geographies 13: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrittella, M., A. Bigano, R. Roson, and R.S. Tol. 2006. A general equilibrium analysis of climate change impacts on tourism. Tourism Management 27: 913–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouder, P., and L. Lundmark. 2011. Climate change in Northern Sweden: Intra-regional perceptions of vulnerability among winter-oriented tourism businesses. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 19: 919–933.

  • Burton, I., S. Huq, B. Lim, O. Pilifosova, and E.L. Schipper. 2002. From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy. Climate Policy 2: 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S.A., and J.E.S. Higham. 2011. Eyes wide shut? UK consumer perceptions on aviation climate impacts and travel decisions to New Zealand. Current Issues in Tourism 14: 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, H., and A.L. Luers. 2006. Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, B.H., and L. Twining-Ward. 2004. Reconceptualizing tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 31: 274–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazey, I., M. Kesby, A. Evely, I. Latham, D. Wagatora, J.E. Hagasua, M.S. Reed, and M. Christie. 2010. A three-tiered approach to participatory vulnerability assessment in the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change 20(4): 713–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, C.B., V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.K. Plattner, and S.K. Allen. 2012. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Füssel, H.M. 2007. Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change 17: 155–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel, H.M., and R.J.T. Klein. 2006. Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change 75: 301–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaas, E., A. Jonsson, M. Hjerpe, and Y. Andersson-Sköld. 2010. Managing climate change vulnerabilities: formal institutions and knowledge use as determinants of adaptive capacity at the local level in Sweden. Local Environment 15: 525–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnaut, R. 2008. Final report [Online]. Retrieved October 11, 2012, from http://www.garnautreview.org.au/index.htm.

  • Gómez Martín, B.M. 2005. Weather, climate and tourism a geographical perspective. Annals of Tourism Research 32: 571–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, B.M. 2005. Ranking the adaptive capacity of nations to climate change when socio-political goals are explicit. Global Environmental Change 15: 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C.M. 2010. Crisis events in tourism: subjects of crisis in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism 13: 401–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C.M., D. Scott, and S. Gössling. 2013. The primacy of climate change for sustainable international tourism. Sustainable Development 21: 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J., S. Marx, and E.U. Weber. 2004. The role of climate perceptions, expectations, and forecasts in farmer decision making: The Argentine Pampas and South Florida. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J., M. Sato, R. Ruedy, K. Lo, D.W. Lea, and M. Medina-Elizade. 2006. Global temperature change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 14288–14293.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrikx, J., C. Zammit, E.O. Hreinsson, and S. Becken. 2013. A comparative assessment of the potential impact of climate change on the ski industry in New Zealand and Australia. Climatic Change 119(3–4): 965–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy, K.J., B. Fitzharris, B.C. Bates, N. Harvey, M. Howden, L. Hughes, J. Salinger, and R. Warrick. 2007. Australia and New Zealand. In Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change, ed. M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P. van der Linden, and C.E. Hanson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, K. 1983. Interpretations of calamity. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, J.E.S., and S.A. Cohen. 2010. Canary in the coalmine: Norwegian attitudes towards climate change and extreme long-haul air travel to Aotearoa/New Zealand. Tourism Management 32: 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsten, A., and J.P. Kropp. 2012. An integrated and transferable climate change vulnerability assessment for regional application. Natural Hazards 64: 1977–1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. 2013a. Learning about climate: an exploration of the socialisation of climate change. Weather, Climate, and Society 5(4): 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. 2013b. The perceived risks of local climate change in Queenstown, New Zealand. Current Issues in Tourism. doi:10.1080/13683500.2013.776022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. 2013c. The sustainability of climate change adaptation strategies in New Zealand’s ski industry: a range of stakeholder perceptions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 22(1): 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D., J.E.S. Higham, and S. Becken. 2013. Climate change in a regional context: relative vulnerability in the Australasian skier market. Regional Environmental Change 13: 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. 2009. Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2013. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change, ed. T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S.K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P.M. Midgley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W. 1985. The interaction of climate and society. In Climate impact assessment: Studies of the interaction of climate and society, ed. R.W. Kates, J.H. Ausubel, and M. Berberian. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, P., and W. Adger. 2000. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change 47: 325–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R.J.T. 2009. Identifying countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change: an academic or a political challenge? Carbon & Climate Law Review 3: 284–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, S., M. Stiffler, D. Baumgartner, and M. Pütz. 2013. Chapter 15: vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in the Alpine space: a case study on the adaptive capacity of the tourism sector. In European Climate Vulnerabilities and Adaptation: A Spatial Planning Perspective, 1st ed, ed. P. Schmidt-Thomé, and S. Greiving. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liverman, D.M. 1990. Vulnerability to global environmental change. In Understanding global environmental change: The contributions of risk analysis and management, ed. R.E. Kasperson, K. Dow, D. Golding, and J.X. Kasperson. Worcester, MA: Clark University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, E.L., and N.L. Engle. 2011. Evaluating regional vulnerability to climate change: purposes and methods. WIRES Climate Change 2: 462–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, P., and T. Dietz. 2008. Structure, agency and environment: Toward an integrated perspective on vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 18: 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for Tourism. 2009. Retrieved August 1, 2011, from http://www.tourism.govt.nz/Our-Work/Our-Work-Summary-page/Climate-Change/.

  • Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment. 2012. Key tourism statistics (Online). Retrieved November 13, 2012, from http://www.med.govt.nz/sectors-industries/tourism/pdf-docs-library/key-tourism-statistics/key-tourism-statistics.pdf.

  • Moreno, A., and S. Becken. 2009. A climate change vulnerability assessment methodology for coastal tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17: 473–488.

  • New Zealand Tourism. 2013. About the tourism industry (Online). Retrieved September 27, 2014, from http://www.tourismnewzealand.com/about-the-tourism-industry/.

  • NIWA. 2013. Overview of New Zealand Climate (Online). Retrieved September 27, 2014, from http://www.niwa.co.nz/education-and-training/schools/resources/climate/overview.

  • O’Brien, K., S. Eriksen, L.P. Nygaard, and A. Schjolden. 2007. Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy 7: 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papatheodorou, A., J. Rosselló, and H. Xiao. 2010. Global economic crisis and tourism: Consequences and perspectives. Journal of Travel Research 49: 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M., J. Palutikof, C.E. Hanson, and J. Lowe. 2008. Squaring up to reality. Nature Reports Climate Change. doi:10.1038/climate.2008.50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters, P., and G. Dubois. 2010. Tourism travel under climate change mitigation constraints. Journal of Transport Geography 18: 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling, M. 2001. Natural disasters? In Social nature: Theory practice, and politics, ed. N. Castree, and B. Braun, 170–188. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, C.M., J.G. Castley, and M. Burtt. 2010. Skiing less often in a warmer world: Attitudes of tourists to climate change in an Australian ski resort. Geographical Research 48: 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polsky, C., R. Neff, and B. Yarnal. 2007. Building comparable global change vulnerability assessments: The vulnerability scoping diagram. Global Environmental Change 17: 472–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux, B., and K.E. McNamara. 2012. Turning a Global Crisis into a Tourism Opportunity: the Perspective from Tuvalu. International Journal of Tourism Research 15(6): 583–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J.R.B., C.M.A. Molinar, and D.C. Frechtling. 2010. Impacts of the world recession and economic crisis on tourism: North America. Journal of Travel Research 49: 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderbauer, S., L. Pedoth, D. Zhang, and M. Zebisch. 2013. Assessing adaptive capacity within regional climate change vulnerability studies—An Alpine example. Natural Hazards 67: 1059–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., B. Amelung, S. Becken, J.P. Ceron, G. Dubois, S. Gössling, P. Peeters, and M. Simpson. 2008. Climate change and tourism: Responding to global challenges. Switzerland: Davos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., C.M. Hall, and S. Gössling. 2012. Tourism and climate change: Impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Routledge: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D., G. McBoyle, and B. Mills. 2003. Climate change and the skiing industry in southern Ontario (Canada): exploring the importance of snowmaking as a technical adaptation. Climate Research 23: 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., I. Burton, R.J.T. Klein, and J. Wandel. 2000. An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climatic Change 45: 223–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I.J., and C.J. Rodger. 2009. Carbon emission offsets for aviation-generated emissions due to international travel to and from New Zealand. Energy Policy 37: 3438–3447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics New Zealand. 2014. Population projection tables. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from http://www.stats.govt.nz/tools_and_services/nzdotstat/population-projections-tables.aspx.

  • Stern, N.H. 2007. The economics of climate change: The stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Treasury. 2012. New Zealand: Economic and financial overview 2012 (Online). Wellington: The Treasury. Retrieved September 27, 2013, from http://www.treasury.govt.nz/economy/overview/2012/nzefo-12.pdf .

  • Tourism New Zealand. 2013. Market and Stats: Latest visitor data and tourism market guides (Online). Retrieved September 1, 2013, from http://www.tourismnewzealand.com/markets-and-stats/.

  • Turner, B.L., R.E. Kasperson, P.A. Matson, J.J. McCarthy, R.W. Corell, L. Christensen, N. Eckley, J.X. Kasperson, A. Luers, and M.L. Martello. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 8074–8079.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbanks, T.J. 2003. Integrating climate change and sustainable development in a place-based context. Climate Policy 3: S147–S154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., and S. Becken. 2011. Perceived deficiencies in the provision of climate and weather information for tourism: A New Zealand media analysis. New Zealand Geographer 67: 148–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wratt, D. & Mullan, B. (N.D.). Climate change scenarios for New Zealand (Online). Retrieved September 11, 2013, from http://www.niwa.co.nz/our-science/climate/information-and-resources/clivar/scenarios.

  • Wratt, D., Salinger, J., Bell, R., Lorrey, D. & Mullan, B. (N.D.). Past climate variations over New Zealand (Online). NIWA. Retrieved September 11, 2013, from http://www.niwa.co.nz/our-science/climate/information-and-resources/clivar/pastclimate.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Professor James Higham, Professor Susanne Becken for their help developing this paper, and the anonymous reviewers and the editors for their constructive feedback on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debbie Hopkins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hopkins, D. Applying a Comprehensive Contextual Climate Change Vulnerability Framework to New Zealand’s Tourism Industry. AMBIO 44, 110–120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0525-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0525-8

Keywords

Navigation