AMBIO

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 527–540

Conceptual Frameworks and Methods for Advancing Invasion Ecology

  • Tina Heger
  • Anna T. Pahl
  • Zoltan Botta-Dukát
  • Francesca Gherardi
  • Christina Hoppe
  • Ivan Hoste
  • Kurt Jax
  • Leena Lindström
  • Pieter Boets
  • Sylvia Haider
  • Johannes Kollmann
  • Meike J. Wittmann
  • Jonathan M. Jeschke
Perspective

DOI: 10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x

Cite this article as:
Heger, T., Pahl, A.T., Botta-Dukát, Z. et al. AMBIO (2013) 42: 527. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0379-x

Abstract

Invasion ecology has much advanced since its early beginnings. Nevertheless, explanation, prediction, and management of biological invasions remain difficult. We argue that progress in invasion research can be accelerated by, first, pointing out difficulties this field is currently facing and, second, looking for measures to overcome them. We see basic and applied research in invasion ecology confronted with difficulties arising from (A) societal issues, e.g., disparate perceptions of invasive species; (B) the peculiarity of the invasion process, e.g., its complexity and context dependency; and (C) the scientific methodology, e.g., imprecise hypotheses. To overcome these difficulties, we propose three key measures: (1) a checklist for definitions to encourage explicit definitions; (2) implementation of a hierarchy of hypotheses (HoH), where general hypotheses branch into specific and precisely testable hypotheses; and (3) platforms for improved communication. These measures may significantly increase conceptual clarity and enhance communication, thus advancing invasion ecology.

Keywords

Communication platforms Definitions and terminology Hierarchy of hypotheses Invasive alien species Synthesis Transdisciplinarity 

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tina Heger
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anna T. Pahl
    • 1
  • Zoltan Botta-Dukát
    • 3
  • Francesca Gherardi
    • 4
  • Christina Hoppe
    • 5
  • Ivan Hoste
    • 6
  • Kurt Jax
    • 1
    • 7
  • Leena Lindström
    • 8
  • Pieter Boets
    • 9
  • Sylvia Haider
    • 1
    • 12
  • Johannes Kollmann
    • 1
  • Meike J. Wittmann
    • 10
  • Jonathan M. Jeschke
    • 1
    • 10
    • 11
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Restoration EcologyTechnische Universität München (TUM)FreisingGermany
  2. 2.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Ecology and BotanyMTA Centre for Ecological ResearchVácrátótHungary
  4. 4.Department of Evolutionary Biology „Leo Pardi“University of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  5. 5.Institute of Ecology, Evolution & Diversity, Plant EcologyGoethe University of FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  6. 6.National Botanic Garden of BelgiumMeiseBelgium
  7. 7.Department of Conservation BiologyHelmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research – UFZLeipzigGermany
  8. 8.Department of Biological and Environmental ScienceUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  9. 9.Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic EcologyGhent UniversityGhentBelgium
  10. 10.Department of Biology II, EcologyLudwig-Maximilians-University MunichPlanegg-MartinsriedGermany
  11. 11.Cary Institute of Ecosystem StudiesMillbrookUSA
  12. 12.Institute of Biology, Geobotany and Botanical GardenMartin Luther University Halle WittenbergHalle (Saale)Germany

Personalised recommendations