Skip to main content
Log in

11C-choline PET/CT tumor recurrence detection and survival prediction in post-treatment patients with high-grade gliomas

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the role of 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in detecting tumor recurrence and predicting survival in post-treatment patients with high-grade gliomas. A total of 16 previously treated histopathologically proven high-grade glioma patients were subjected to 11C-choline PET/CT scan and survival analysis. We found that the sensitivity and specificity of 11C-choline PET/CT were 100 and 70 %, whereas those of Gd-MRI were 83.3 and 60 %, respectively. By Cox regression analysis, 11C-choline T/N ratio correlated obviously with overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio = 2.644, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.027–6.807, p = 0.044) independent of Karnofsky performance score. Patients with lower T/N ratio (tumor uptake/normal brain tissue uptake) (≤1.42) had longer survival times than patients with higher T/N ratio (median OS = 15.4 vs. 5.3 months, p < 0.001; progression-free survival (PFS) =4.5 vs. 0.8 months, p = 0.004). Thus, this preliminary study suggests that 11C-choline PET/CT is highly sensitive in detecting tumor recurrence in post-treatment patients with high-grade gliomas. Moreover, our preliminary results suggest that T/N ratio measured by 11C-choline maybe serves as a predictor of patients’ survival with suspected recurrent glioma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clarke J, Butowski N, Chang S. Recent advances in therapy for glioblastoma. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:279–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ. Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:453–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caroline I, Rosenthal MA. Imaging modalities in high-grade gliomas: pseudoprogression, recurrence, or necrosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:633–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah AH, Snelling B, Bregy A, Patel PR, Tememe D, Bhatia R, et al. Discriminating radiation necrosis from tumor progression in gliomas: a systematic review what is the best imaging modality. J Neurooncol. 2013;112:141–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Knudsen-Baas KM, Moen G, Fluge O, Storstein A. Pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2013;196:31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chamberlain MC, Glantz MJ, Chalmers L, Van Horn A, Sloan AE. Early necrosis following concurrent Temodar and radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2007;82:81–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jahangiri A, Aghi MK. Pseudoprogression and treatment effect. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2012;23:277–87. viii-ix.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Patronas NJ, Di CG, Brooks RA, DeLaPaz RL, Kornblith PL, Smith BH, et al. Work in progress: [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography in the evaluation of radiation necrosis of the brain. Radiology. 1982;144:885–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gulyas B, Halldin C. New PET radiopharmaceuticals beyond FDG for brain tumor imaging. Q J Nucl Med. 2012;56:173–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ito K, Yokoyama J, Kubota K, Morooka M. Comparison of 18F-FDG and 11C-choline PET/CT for detecting recurrences in patients with nonsquamous cell head and neck malignancies. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:931–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Narayanan TK, Said S, Mukherjee J, Christian B, Satter M, Dunigan K, et al. A comparative study on the uptake and incorporation of radiolabeled methionine, choline and fluorodeoxyglucose in human astrocytoma. Mol Imaging Biol. 2002;4:147–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hara T, Kondo T, Hara T, Kosaka N. Use of 18F-choline and 11C-choline as contrast agents in positron emission tomography imaging-guided stereotactic biopsy sampling of gliomas. J Neurosurg. 2003;99:474–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nuutinen J, Leskinen S, Lindholm P, Söderström KO, Någren K, Huhtala S, et al. Use of carbon-11 methionine positron emission tomography to assess malignancy grade and predict survival in patients with lymphomas. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:729–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang I, Aghi MK. New advances that enable identification of glioblastoma recurrence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6:648–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karunanithi S, Sharma P, Kumar A, Khangembam BC, Bandopadhyaya GP, Kumar R, et al. 18F-FDOPA PET/CT for detection of recurrence in patients with glioma: prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:1025–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen W, Silverman DH, Delaloye S, Czernin J, Kamdar N, Pope W, et al. 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:904–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Herrmann K, Czernin J, Cloughesy T, Lai A, Pomykala KL, Benz MR, et al. Comparison of visual and semiquantitative analysis of 18F-FDOPA-PET/CT for recurrence detection in glioblastoma patients. Neuro Oncol. 2014;16:603–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Siepmann DB, Siegel A, Lewis PJ. Tl-201 SPECT and F-18 FDG PET for assessment of glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis. Clin Nucl Med. 2005;30:199–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan H, Chen L, Guan Y, Lin X. Comparison of MRI, F-18 FDG, and 11C-choline PET/CT for their potentials in differentiating brain tumor recurrence from brain tumor necrosis following radiotherapy. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:978–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Caroli P, Nanni C, Rubello D, Alavi A, Fanti S. Non-FDG PET in the practice of oncology. Indian J Cancer. 2010;47:120–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hara T, Kosaka N, Kishi H. PET imaging of prostate cancer using carbon-11-choline. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:990–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barker 2nd FG, Chang SM, Valk PE, Pounds TR, Prados MD. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and survival of patients with suspected recurrent malignant glioma. Cancer. 1997;79:115–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Santra A, Kumar R, Sharma P, Bal C, Julka PK, Malhotra A. F-18 FDG PET-CT for predicting survival in patients with recurrent glioma: a prospective study. Neuroradiology. 2011;53:1017–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of the PET/CT Center, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, particularly Shuqiang Zhao, Zheng Fu, Xiaorong Sun, and Jinsong Zheng, for their technical support. This work was supported in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2012HL41).

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xudong Hu.

Additional information

Wanhu Li and Li Ma equally contributed to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, W., Ma, L., Wang, X. et al. 11C-choline PET/CT tumor recurrence detection and survival prediction in post-treatment patients with high-grade gliomas. Tumor Biol. 35, 12353–12360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2549-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2549-x

Keywords

Navigation