Skip to main content
Log in

Kernel Intensity Estimation of 2-Dimensional Spatial Poisson Point Processes From k-Tree Sampling

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To estimate the spatial intensity (density) of plants and animals, ecologists often sample populations by prespecifing a spatial array of points, then measuring the distance from each point to the k nearest organisms, a so-called k-tree sampling method. A variety of ad hoc methods are available for estimating intensity from k-tree sampling data, but they assume that two distinct points of the array do not share nearest neighbors. However, nearest neighbors are likely to be shared when the population intensity is low, as it is in our application. The purpose of this paper is twofold: (a) to derive and use for estimation the likelihood function for a k-tree sample under an inhomogeneous Poisson point-process model and (b) to estimate spatial intensity when nearest neighbors are shared. We derive the likelihood function for an inhomogeneous Poisson point-process with intensity λ(x,y) and propose a likelihood-based, kernel-smoothed estimator \(\hat{\lambda}(x,y)\). Performance of the method for k=1 is tested on four types of simulated populations: two homogeneous populations with low and high intensity, a population simulated from a bivariate normal distribution of intensity, and a “cliff” population in which the region is divided into high- and low-intensity subregions. The method correctly detected spatial variation in intensity across different subregions of the simulated populations. Application to 1-tree samples of carnivorous pitcher plants populations in four New England peat bogs suggests that the method adequately captures empirical patterns of spatial intensity. However, our method suffers from two evident sources of bias. First, like other kernel smoothers, it underestimates peaks and overestimates valleys. Second, it has positive bias analogous to that of the MLE for the rate parameter of exponential random variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Augustin, N. H., Musio, M., von Wilpert, K., Kublin, E., Wood, S. N., and Schumacher, M. (2009), “Modeling Spatiotemporal Forest Health Monitoring Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 104, 899–911.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. C., Burk, J. H., Pitts, W. D., Gilliam, F. S., and Schwartz, M. W. (1999), Terrestrial Plant Ecology (3rd ed.), Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byth, K., and Ripley, B. D. (1980), “On Sampling Spatial Patterns by Distance Methods,” Biometrics, 36, 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damggard, C. (2009), “On the Distribution of Plant Abundance Data,” Ecological Informatics, 4, 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P. J. (1975), “Robust Density Estimation Using Distance Methods,” Biometrika, 62, 39–48.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1977), “A Note on Robust Density Estimation for Spatial Point Patterns,” Biometrika, 64, 91–95.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, A. M., and Parker, J. N. (2002), “Seed Dispersal and Seedling Establishment of Sarracenia Purpurea (Sarraceniaceae),” American Journal of Botany, 89, 1024–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinn, C., and Vilčko, F. (2006), “Distance-Unbiased Estimation for Point-to-Tree Distance Sampling,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1407–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, D. I., Nichols, J. D., Royle, J. A., Pollock, K. H., Bailey, L. L., and Hines, J. E. (2006), Occupancy Modeling and Estimation, San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen, S. (2012), “A New Composite k-Tree Estimator of Stem Density,” European Journal of Forest Research, 131, 1513–1527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnussen, S., Fehrmann, L., and Platt, W. J. (2012), “An Adaptive Composite Density Estimator for k-Tree Sampling,” European Journal of Forest Research, 131, 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, W. W. (1994), “Population Regulation in Theory and Practice,” Ecology, 75, 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nothdurft, A., Saborowski, J., Nuske, R. S., and Stoyan, D. (2010), “Density Estimation Based on k-Tree Sampling and Point Pattern Reconstruction,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 40, 953–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil, S. A., Burnham, K. P., and Kovner, J. L. (1979), “Nonparametric Estimation of Plant Density by the Distance Method,” Biometrics, 35, 597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, G. H., and Ehrlich, P. R. (2010), “Biological Collections and Ecological/environmental Research: a Review, Some Observations and a Look to the Future,” Biological Reviews, 85, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F., and Salehi, M. M. (2012), Adaptive Sampling Designs: Inference for Sparse and Clustered Populations, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Lavine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ellison, A.M., Gotelli, N.J., Hsiang, N. et al. Kernel Intensity Estimation of 2-Dimensional Spatial Poisson Point Processes From k-Tree Sampling. JABES 19, 357–372 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-014-0175-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-014-0175-0

Key Words

Navigation