Skip to main content
Log in

Inference for Size Demography From Point Pattern Data Using Integral Projection Models

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Population dynamics with regard to evolution of traits has typically been studied using matrix projection models (MPMs). Recently, to work with continuous traits, integral projection models (IPMs) have been proposed. Imitating the path with MPMs, IPMs are handled first with a fitting stage, then with a projection stage. Fitting these models has so far been done only with individual-level transition data. These data are used to estimate the demographic functions (survival, growth, fecundity) that comprise the kernel of the IPM specification. Then, the estimated kernel is iterated from an initial trait distribution to project steady state population behavior under this kernel. When trait distributions are observed over time, such an approach does not align projected distributions with these observed temporal benchmarks.

The contribution here, focusing on size distributions, is to address this issue. Our concern is that the above approach introduces an inherent mismatch in scales. The redistribution kernel in the IPM proposes a mechanistic description of population level redistribution. A kernel of the same functional form, fitted to data at the individual level, would provide a mechanistic model for individual-level processes. Resulting parameter estimates and the associated estimated kernel are at the wrong scale and do not allow population-level interpretation.

Our approach views the observed size distribution at a given time as a point pattern over a bounded interval. We build a three-stage hierarchical model to infer about the dynamic intensities used to explain the observed point patterns. This model is driven by a latent deterministic IPM and we introduce uncertainty by having the operating IPM vary around this deterministic specification. Further uncertainty arises in the realization of the point pattern given the operating IPM. Fitted within a Bayesian framework, such modeling enables full inference about all features of the model. Such dynamic modeling, optimized by fitting to data observed over time, is better suited to projection.

Exact Bayesian model fitting is very computationally challenging; we offer approximate strategies to facilitate computation. We illustrate with simulated data examples as well as well as a set of annual tree growth data from Duke Forest in North Carolina. A further example shows the benefit of our approach, in terms of projection, compared with the foregoing individual level fitting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, P. B., Ellner, S. P., and Levine, J. M. (2010), “Coexistence of Perennial Plants: An Embarrassment of Niches,” Ecology Letters, 13, 1019–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., Carlin, B. P., and Gelfand, A. E. (2004), Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, H. T., Kareiva, P. M., and Murphy, K. A. (1987), “Parameter Estimation Techniques for Interaction and Redistribution Models: A Predator-Prey Example,” Oecologia, 74, 356–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, H. T., Botsford, L. W., Kappell, F., and Wang, C. (1991), “Estimation of Growth and Survival in Size-Structured Cohort Data—An Application to Larval Striped Bass (Morone Saxatilis),” Journal of Mathematical Biology, 30, 125–150.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, H. (2001), Matrix Population Models: Construction, Analysis and Interpretation (2nd ed.), Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2008), “Perturbation Analysis of Nonlinear Matrix Population Models,” Demographic Research, 18, 59–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, A., Gelfand, A. E., Wilson, A. M., Latimer, A. M., and Silander, J. A. (2011), “Point Pattern Modeling for Degraded Presence-Only Data Over Large Regions,” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 60 (5), 757–776.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. S., Bell, D. M., Hersh, M. H., and Nichols, L. (2011a), “Climate Change Vulnerability of Forest Biodiversity: Climate and Resource Tracking of Demographic Rates,” Global Change Biology, 17, 1834–1849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. S., Bell, D. M., Hersh, M. H., Kwit, M., Moran, E., Salk, C., Stine, A., Valle, D., and Zhu, K. (2011b), “Individual-Scale Variation, Species-Scale Differences: Inference Needed to Understand Diversity.” Ecology Letters, 14, 1273–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. S., Bell, D. M., Dietze, M., Hersh, M., Ibáñez, I., LaDeau, S., McMahon, S., Metcalf, J., Moran, E., Pangle, L., and Wolosin, M. (2010a), “Models for Demography of Plant Populations,” in The Oxford Handbook of Applied Bayesian Analysis, eds. T. O’Hagan and M. West, London: Oxford University Press, pp. 431–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. S., Bell, D., Chu, C., Courbaud, B., Dietze, M., Hersh, M., HilleRisLambers, J., Ibáñez, I., LaDeau, S., McMahon, S., Metcalf, J., Mohan, J., Moran, E., Pangle, L., Pearson, S., Salk, C., Shen, Z., Valle, D., and Wyckoff, P. (2010b), “High-Dimensional Coexistence Based on Individual Variation: A Synthesis of Evidence,” Ecological Monographs, 80, 569–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, J. P., Garcia, M. B., and Ehrlén, J. (2011), “Nonlinear Relationships Between Vital Rates and State Variables in Demographic Models,” Ecology. doi:10.1890/10-1184.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalgleish, H. J., Koons, D. N., Hooten, M. B., Moffet, C. A., and Adler, P. B. (2011), “Climate Influences the Demography of Three Dominant Sagebrush Steppe Plants,” Ecology, 92, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P. J., and Rabinowitz, P. (1984), Methods of Numerical Integration (2nd ed.), New York: Academic Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, B., Desharnais, R. A., Cushing, J. M., and Costantino, R. F. (1997), “Transitions in Population Dynamics: Equilibria to Periodic Cycles to Aperiodic Cycles,” Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 704–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, B., Desharnais, R. A., Cushing, J. M., and Costantino, R. F. (1995), “Nonlinear Demographic Dynamics: Mathematical Models, Statistical Methods, and Biological Experiments,” Ecological Monographs, 65, 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P. J. (2003), Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns (2nd ed.), London: Arnold.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Easterling, M. R., Ellner, S. P., and Dixon, P. M. (2000), “Size-Specific Sensitivity: Applying a New Structured Population Model,” Ecology, 81, 694–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellner, S. P., and Rees, M. (2006), “Integral Projection Models for Species With Complex Demography,” The American Naturalist, 167, 410–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2007), “Stochastic Stable Population Growth in Integral Projection Models: Theory and Application,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, 54, 227–256.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, M. C., and Hausman, J. (2007), “Using a Laplace Approximation to Estimate the Random Coefficients Logit Model by Non-linear Least Squares,” International Economic Review, 48, 1311–1328.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hooten, M. B., Wikle, C. K., Dorazio, R. M., and Royle, J. A. (2007), “Hierarchical Spatio-Temporal Matrix Models for Characterizing Invasions,” Biometrics, 63, 558–567.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N., and Caswell, H. (2005), Applied Mathematical Demography (3rd ed.), New York: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kot, M., Lewis, M., and van den Driessche, P. (1996), “Dispersal Data and the Spread of Invading Organisms,” Ecology, 77, 2027–2042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, M., and Ellner, S. P. (2009), “Integral Projection Models for Populations in Temporally Varying Environments,” Ecological Monographs, 79, 575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, W. E. (1954), “Stock and Recruitment,” Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 11, 559–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L., Kass, R. E., and Kadane, J. B. (1989a), “Fully Exponential Laplace Approximations to Expectations and Variances of Nonpositive Functions,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 710–716.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — (1989b), “Approximate Marginal Densities of Nonlinear Functions,” Biometrika, 76, 425–433.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tuljapurkar, S. (1990), Population Dynamics in Variable Environments, London: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tuljapurkar, S., and Caswell, H. (eds.) (1997), Structured-Population Models in Marine, Terrestrial, and Freshwater Systems, New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. (2009), “Multi-Level Modelling, the Ecologic Fallacy, and Hybrid Study Designs,” International Journal of Epidemiology, 38, 330–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikle, C. K. (2002), “A Kernel-Based Spectral Model for Non-Gaussian Spatio-Temporal Processes,” Statistical Modelling: An International Journal, 2, 299–314.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wikle, C. K., and Hooten, M. B. (2010), “A General Science-Based Framework for Nonlinear Spatio-Temporal Dynamical Models,” Test, 19, 417–451.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K., Wikle, C. K., and Fox, N. (2005), “A Kernel Based Spatio Temporal Dynamical Model for Nowcasting Radar Precipitation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 1133–1144.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. (2004), “Inconsistent Estimation and Asymptotically Equal Interpolations in Model-Based Geostatistics,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 250–261.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zuidema, P. A., Jongejans, E., Chien, P. D., During, H. J., and Schieving, F. (2010), “Integral Projection Models for Trees: A New Parameterization Method and a Validation of Model Output,” Journal of Ecology, 98, 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan E. Gelfand.

Additional information

This invited paper is discussed in the comments available at doi:10.1007/s13253-012-0119-5, doi:10.1007/s13253-012-0120-z, doi:10.1007/s13253-012-0121-y.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghosh, S., Gelfand, A.E. & Clark, J.S. Inference for Size Demography From Point Pattern Data Using Integral Projection Models. JABES 17, 641–677 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-012-0123-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-012-0123-9

Key Words

Navigation