Skip to main content
Log in

Better Predictor of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: Asian or WHO International Cutoff? A Single-Centre Prospective Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the Asian Indian body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) with World Health Organization (WHO) BMI and WC in the prediction of adverse maternal and perinatal outcome in overweight and obese women.

Materials and Methods

Prospective analysis of 239 women booked within 10 weeks of pregnancy and followed till delivery at our centre was performed.

Results

The mean age of the study group was 26.08 years, of which elderly gravida was 1.3 %. Overall, 17.6 % were overweight, 29.7 % were obese, and 42.7 % had abdominal obesity as per Asian Indian BMI and WC cutoff, whereas only 8.5 % were obese, and 14.2 % had abdominal obesity as per WHO. In high-risk group, gestational diabetes was commonest complication (20 %). Compared to WHO, Asian Indian BMI cutoff has statistically significant predictability for gestational diabetes, preeclampsia and its complications, labour induction, and Caesarean section rate. On the other hand, Asian WC has the best predictability only for preeclampsia and its complications. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of Asian BMI were 82, 55 and 96 % when compared with 60.7, 72.3 and 92 % of WHO BMI.

Conclusion

Categorising women using Asian BMI, an increase in the prevalence of obesity by threefold is noted. Asian BMI and WC have high sensitivity in predicting adverse maternal and foetal outcomes and should be widely implemented in obstetric practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mohan Reddy N, Kumar K. New world syndrome (obesity) in South India. Open Access Sci Rep. 2012;1:567.

  2. Anjana V, Srimali L. Maternal body mass index and pregnancy outcome. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(9):1531–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kalra S, Unnikrishnan AG. Obesity in India: the weight of the nation. J Med Nutr Nutraceuticals. 2012;1(1):37–41.

  4. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. The Lancet. 2004;363:157–63.

  5. Misra A, Chowbey P. Consensus statement for diagnosis of obesity, abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome for Asian Indians and recommendations for physical activity, medical and surgical management. JAPI. 2009;57:163–70.

  6. Wendland EM, Duncan BB, Mengue SS, et al. Waist circumference in the prediction of obesity-related adverse pregnancy outcomes. Cad Saude Publ Rio J. 2007;23(2):391–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anuradha R, Ravivarman G. The prevalence of overweight and obesity among women in an urban slum of Chennai. J Clin Diagn Res. 2011;5(5):957–60.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aziz N, Kallur SD. Implications of the revised consensus body mass indices for Asian Indians on clinical obstetric practice. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(5):OC01–3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dasgupta A, Harichandrakumar KT, Habeebullah S. Pregnancy outcome among obese Indians—a prospective cohort study in a tertiary care centre in South India. Int J Sci Study. 2014;2(2):13–8.

  10. Asim SS, Naeem H. Pregnancy with obesity—a risk factor for PIH. JLUMHS 2010;09(03):125–9.

  11. Srivastava R, Sharma NR, Kushwaha KP, et al. Obstetric behaviour and pregnancy outcome in overweight and obese women. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62(3):276–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vinayagam V, Chandraharan E. The adverse impact of maternal obesity on intrapartum and perinatal outcomes. Int Sch Res Netw ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012; Article ID 939762, 5 pp. doi:10.5402/2012/939762.

  13. Ali HS, Lakhani N. Effect of obesity and its outcome among pregnant women. Pak J Med Sci. 2011;27(5):1126–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Usha Kiran TS, et al. Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;112:768–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Studd J. Progress in obstetrics and gynecology. In: Vyas S, Ghani L, editors. Pregnancy and obesity. 18th ed. Chap 2, p. 11–28.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. O. Sharadha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Declaration of Helsinki 1975, as revised in 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Additional information

Dr. S. O. Sharadha, DGO,DNB OBG is Senior Resident in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ashok Pillar Road, K.K. Nagar, Chennai-78; Dr. N. Punithavathi DGO, DNB OBG is Senior Resident in Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, K.K. Nagar, Chennai-78; Dr. T. K. Renuka Devi, MD DGO is Head of the Department, OBG in ESIC Medical College and PGIMSR, K.K. Nagar, Chennai-78.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharadha, S.O., Punithavathi, N. & Renuka Devi, T.K. Better Predictor of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: Asian or WHO International Cutoff? A Single-Centre Prospective Study. J Obstet Gynecol India 66 (Suppl 1), 181–186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0824-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0824-4

Keywords

Navigation