Abstract
Renewable energy sources such as wind energy are available without any limitations. In order to extract this energy efficiency, the reliability of such technologies is critical if pay back periods and power generation requirements are to be met. Due to recent developments in the field of wind engineering and in particular the expansion of installed capacity around the world, the need for reliable and intelligent diagnostic tools is of greater importance. The number of offshore wind turbines installed in the seas around Britain’s coasts is likely to increase from just fewer than 150–7,500 over the next 10 years with the potential cost of £10 billion. Operation and Maintenance activities are estimated to be 35 % against the cost of electricity. However, the development of appropriate and efficient maintenance strategies is currently lacking in the wind industry. The current reliability and failure modes of offshore wind turbines are known and have been used to develop preventive and corrective maintenance strategies which have done little to improve reliability. In addition, the failure of one minor component can cause escalated damage to a major component, which can increase repair and or replacement costs. A reliability centered maintenance (RCM) approach offers considerable benefit to the management of wind turbine operations since it includes an appreciation of the impact of faults on operations. Due to the high costs involved in performing maintenance and the even higher costs associated with failures and subsequent downtime and repair, it is critical that the impacts are considered when maintenance is planned. This paper provides an overview of the application of RCM and on line e-condition monitoring to wind turbine maintenance management. Unplanned maintenance levels can be reduced by increasing the reliability of the gear box and individual gears through the analysis of lubricants. Finally the paper will discuss the development of a complete sensor-based processing unit that can continuously monitor the wind turbines lubricated systems and provide, via wireless technology, real time data enabling on shore staff with the ability to predict degradation anticipate problems and take remedial action before damage and failure occurs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baglee A et al. (2006) Modern maintenance practices: the barriers to implementation within small/medium enterprises. In: International conference on modeling in industrial maintenance and reliability, Salford, UK
Baldwin A, Lunt S (2010) Latest developments in online oil condition monitoring sensors. In: The seventh international conference on condition monitoring and machinery failure prevention technologies (BINDT CM 2010)
Barber S, Golbeck P (2010) The benefits of a pro-active approach using preventive and predictive maintenance tools and strategies—actual examples and case studies. http://www.wwindea.org/technology/ch03/en/3_4_3.html. Accessed 13 July 2013
Barnes J, Hengeveld J, Foster S, Schasfoort T, Scheele R (2004) Oil stress investigations in Shell’s medium speed laboratory engine. CIMAC Congress, Kyoto
Ben-Daya M (2000) You may need RCM to enhance TPM implementation. J Qual Maint Eng 6(2):82–85
Botsaris PN, Konstantinidis EI (2010) Wind. In: Seventh international conference on condition monitoring and machinery failure prevention technologies, Stratford, UK
Braam H, Rademakers L (2004) Models to analyze operation and maintenance aspects of offshore wind farms. ECN report
Global Wind Energy Outlook (2012), 4th edn, pp 1–51
Gorritxategi E, Arnaiz A, Aranzabe, E, Ciria J, Terradillos J (2006) Indirect optical measurements for lubricant status assessment. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management, Luleå, Sweden, pp 367–376
Gorritxategi E, Arnaiz A, Belew J (2007) Marine oil monitorization by means of on-line sensors, instrumentation viewpoint
Graf M (2009) Wind turbine gearbox lubrication: performance, selection and cleanliness. In: Wind Turbine Condition Monitoring Workshop, Broomfield, CO
Hong HZ, Cho YS, Ahn YM, Song KC (2009) Condition monitoring and fault detection of wind turbines and related algorithms. A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:1–39
Jack P (2012) Changing paradigms in CM: online oil analysis, extended particle analysis, software and more. In: Condition monitoring 301: 21st century condition monitoring STLE annual meeting, pp 161–283
Kaelbling LP, Littman ML, Moore AW (1996) Reinforcement learning: a survey. J Artif Intell Res 4:237–285
Knowles MJ, Baglee D (2010) Condition monitoring in an on-ship environment. In: The seventh international conference on condition monitoring and machinery failure prevention technologies (BINDT CM 2010)
Knowles MJ, Baglee D, Wermter S (2010) Reinforcement learning for scheduling of maintenance. In: Thirtieth SGAI international conference on artificial intelligence (AI-2010)
Kuremoto T, Kobayashi K, Obayashi M (2005) Nonlinear prediction by reinforcement learning (ICIC 2005). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3644. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 1085–1094
Laurence RB (1994) The effect of lubrication system and marine specific factors on diesel engine emissions. MSc thesis submitted to Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lee J, Ni J, Djurdjanovic D, Qiu H, Liao H (2006) Intelligent prognostics tools and e-maintenance. Comput Ind 57(6):476–489
McMillan D, Ault G (2008a) Condition monitoring benefit for onshore wind turbines: sensitivity to operational parameters. IET Renew Power Gener 2:60–72
McMillan D, Ault G (2008) Specification of reliability benchmarks for offshore wind farms. In: Proceedings of European safety and reliability
Meng T, Dresel W (2007) Lubricants and lubrication. Wiley, Weinheim. ISBN 978-3-527-31497-3
Moore I, Ekanayake J (2010) Design and development of a hardware based wind turbine simulator. In: 45th international universities power engineering conference (UPEC)
Neammanee B, Sirisumrannukul S, Chtratana S (2007) Development of a wind turbine simulator for wind generator testing. Int Energy J 8:21–28
Nichita C, Luca D, Dakyo B, Ceanga E (2002) Large band simulator of wind speed for real time wind turbine simulators. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 17(4):523–529
Polinder H, van der Pijl FFA, de Vilder GJ, Tavner PJ (2006) Comparison of direct-drive and geared generator concepts for wind turbines. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 21(3):725–733
Poore R et al (2003) Wind pact drive train designs study, NREL report SR-500-33196, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO
Puigcorbe J, de-Beaumont A (2010) Wind turbine gearbox reliability: The impact of rotor support. http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2010/06/wind-turbine-gearbox-reliability. Accessed 15 June 2013
Rademakers LWMM, Braam H, Verbruggen TW (2003) R&D needs for O&M of wind turbines. In: Proceedings of European wind energy conference, Madrid, Spain
Sheng S (2011) Investigation of oil conditioning, real-time monitoring and oil sample analysis for wind turbine gearboxes. In: AWEA Project Performance and Reliability Workshop, San Diego, CA
Tavner P, Bussel GV, Spinato F (2006) Machine and converter reliabilities in wind turbines. PEMD, pp 127–130
Tavner P, Xiang J, Spinato F (2007) Reliability analysis for wind turbines. Wind Energy 10:1–18
Wu F, Wang T, Lee J (2010) An online adaptive condition-based maintenance method for mechanical systems. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(8):2985–2995
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, S., Baglee, D., Michael, K. et al. Developing RCM strategy for wind turbines utilizing e-condition monitoring. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 6, 150–156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0259-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0259-9