Skip to main content
Log in

Developing and Evaluating Multimedia Patient Education Tools to Better Prepare Prostate-Cancer Patients for Radiotherapy Treatment (Randomized Study)

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of multimedia educational tools to improve CT planning preparation for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. Many patients are not prepared when given verbal preparation instructions to have a full bladder and empty rectum for their IMRT and require being rescanned, which results in additional costs for the patient and the hospital. A pamphlet and video outlining the proper preparation for prostate IMRT was created to decrease additional scans and the associated costs, while increasing patient satisfaction. A controlled, randomized experimental group study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the multimedia tools (the video and the pamphlet), as compared to the pamphlet only, in preparing patients for their planning CT appointment. We found no statistical difference between the multimedia group and the pamphlet group in patients’ preparedness for their appointments and the rescanning rate. However, patients in the multimedia group indicated that they felt more prepared about their treatment after watching the video and stated that they would recommend the video to other patients with prostate cancer. Furthermore, patients who had to wait longer for their planning CT appointment felt less prepared by the materials than those with a shorter wait time. We recommend reducing wait times between appointments as much as possible to increase patients’ preparedness for the planning CT. We conclude that providing multimedia treatment information and minimizing wait times increases patients’ feelings of preparedness leading to a more positive treatment experience and reducing costly rescans.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02410291

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics (2015) Prostate Cancer Statistics. Canadian Cancer Society., http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/prostate/statistics/?region=on. Accessed 5 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zelefsky MJ, Fuks Z, Happersett L et al (2000) Clinical experience with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 55:241–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alicikus ZA, Yamada Y, Zhang Z et al (2011) Ten-year outcomes of high-dose, intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cancer 117:1429–1437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Michalski JM, Yan Y, Watkins-Bruner D et al (2013) Preliminary toxicity analysis of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy on the high-dose arm of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0126 prostate cancer trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:932–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boersma LJ, van den Brink M, Bruce AM et al (1998) Estimation of the incidence of late bladder and rectum complications after high-dose (70–80 Gy) conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer, using dose–volume histogram. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41:83–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiorino C, Reni M, Bolognesi A et al (1998) Intra and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning. Radiother Oncol 47:285–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiorino C, Vavassori V, Sanguineti G et al (2002) Rectum contouring variability in patients treated for prostate cancer: impact on rectum DVHs and NTCP. Radiother Oncol 63:249–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiorino C, Cozzarini C, Vavassori V et al (2002) Relationships between DVHs and late rectal bleeding after radiotherapy for prostate cancer: analysis of a large group of patients pooled from three institutions. Radiother Oncol 64:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fiorino C, Gianolini S, Nahum AE (2003) A cylindrical model of the rectum: comparing dose–volume, dose–surface and dose–wall histograms in the radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol 48:2603–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiorino C, Sanguineti G, Cozzarini C et al (2003) Rectal dose– volume constraints in high-dose radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol 57:953–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fokdal L, Honore H, Hoyer M et al (2005) Dose–volume histogram associated to long-term colorectal function in patients receiving pelvic radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 74:203–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Foppiano F, Fiorino C, Frezza G et al (2003) The impact of contouring uncertainty on rectal 3D dose–volume data: results of a dummy run in a multi-centric trial (AIROPROS01-02). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:573–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mirabell R, Taussky D, Rinaldi D et al (2003) Influence of rectal volume changes during radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a predictive model for mild-to-moderate late rectal toxicity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:1280–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pollack A, Zagars G, Starskschall G et al (2002) Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the MD Anderson phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53:1097–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoogeman MS, van Herk M, Yan D et al (2002) A model to simulate day-to-day variations in rectum shape. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:615–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Crevoisier R, Dong L, Bonnen MD et al (2004) Quantification of volumetric changes and internal organ motion during radiotherapy for prostate cancer using an integrated CT/linear accelerator system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Physics 60:227–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Crevoisier RS, Tucker L, Dong R et al (2005) Increased risk of biochemical and local failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning CT for prostate cancer radiotherapy. Int J Radiation Oncol Phys 62(4):965–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brouse CH, Wolf RL (2008) Facilitating factors for colorectal cancer screening. J Cancer Educ 23:26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas R, Daly M, Perryman B, Stockton D (2000) Forewarned is forearmed-benefits of preparatory information on video cassette for patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation therapy randomized controlled trial. European J Cancer Care 36:1536–1543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewa Szumacher.

Ethics declarations

Research and Ethics Board approval (099-2015) was obtained and the study is a single institutional study registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 168 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 224 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 78 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dawdy, K., Bonin, K., Russell, S. et al. Developing and Evaluating Multimedia Patient Education Tools to Better Prepare Prostate-Cancer Patients for Radiotherapy Treatment (Randomized Study). J Canc Educ 33, 551–556 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1091-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1091-5

Keywords

Navigation